96 research outputs found

    Comparison of pulmonary artery pressure measurements in the supine and lateral positions

    Get PDF
    Pulmonary artery pressure monitoring, with the patient in both the supine and lateral position, constitutes an essential element of assessment in the critically ill. Previous work offers conflicting results regarding the accuracy of pulmonary artery pressure measurements obtained with the patient in the lateral position. Additionally, recent studies question the most appropriate thoracic surface landmark for use as the zero point for pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. The purpose of this study was to identify a reliable surface landmark to be used as the zero point for pulmonary artery pressure monitoring, as well as to determine if use of that zero point provided accurate pulmonary artery pressure measurements when the patient was in either the left or right 60° lateral position. Specifically, these questions were related to the post-operative cardiac surgical patient. Thirty-five post-operative cardiac patients, with pulmonary artery catheters in situ, were prospectively enrolled in this correlational study. All subjects underwent repositioning between the supine and both the left and right 60° lateral position on two occasions each, once while being mechanically ventilated and once while breathing spontaneously. Pulmonary artery pressure measurements, including Pulmonary Artery Systolic, Diastolic, Mean and Capillary Wedge Pressure, were recorded prior to, two minutes following and ten minutes following repositioning. For each subject a surface landmark was identified which corresponded with the mid-point of the thorax in each of the left and right 60° lateral position. Results showed that the dependent mid-clavicular line was the most frequent surface landmark for the zero-point (83% and 74% left and right respectively). Following change of position, pulmonary artery pressure measurements were variable. In the spontaneously breathing subject these differences had resolved and all pulmonary artery pressure measurements were statistically reliable 10 minutes after repositioning. In subjects being mechanically ventilated, despite some differences remaining, the Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure measurement was statistically reliable 10 minutes after repositioning. This study concludes that clinical practitioners can confidently obtain accurate Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure measurements in both the spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated post-operative cardiac surgical patient positioned in either the left or right 60° lateral positio

    Assessing cardiovascular status: a guide for acute nurses

    Full text link
    Many patients admitted to acute care areas of a hospital experience cardiovascular compromise due to conditions such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute coronary syndrome or exacerbations of chronic heart failure. Additionally, patients can experience cardiovascular collapse due to bleeding or cardiac arrhythmias postoperatively. As a consequence, nurses in acute care settings need to be competent in assessing the cardiovascular status of adult patients. The authors provide a framework for assessing the cardiovascular status of patients in acute care settings using the determinants of cardiac output. They provide a brief review of the determinants of cardiac output before discussing both the aims of cardiovascular assessment and how to perform, such an assessment. (non- author abstract)<br /

    Inconsistent relationship between depth of sedation and intensive care outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To determine the effect of depth of sedation on intensive care mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and other clinically important outcomes. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO from 2000 - 2020. Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that examined the effect of sedation depth were included. Two reviewers independently screened, selected articles, extracted data and appraised quality. Data on study design, population, setting, patient characteristics, study interventions, depth of sedation and relevant outcomes were extracted. Quality was assessed using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools. Results: We included data from 26 studies (n=7865 patients): 8 RCTs and 18 cohort studies. Heterogeneity of studies was substantial. There was no significant effect of lighter sedation on intensive care mortality. Lighter sedation did not affect duration of mechanical ventilation in RCTs (mean difference [MD]: -1.44 days [95% CI -3.79 to 0.91]) but did in cohort studies (MD: -1.54 days [95% CI -2.68 to -0.39]). No statistically significant benefit of lighter sedation was identified in RCTs. In cohort studies lighter sedation improved time to extubation, intensive care and hospital length of stay and Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. We found no significant effects for hospital mortality, delirium or adverse events. Conclusion: Evidence of benefit from lighter sedation is limited, with inconsistency between observational and randomised studies. Positive effects were mainly limited to low quality evidence from observational studies, which could be attributable to bias and confounding factors
    corecore