10 research outputs found

    Virus-Free CRISPR CAR T cells induce solid tumor regression

    Get PDF
    Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shown promising efficacy in treating hematologic malignancies and has led to the FDA-approval of three CAR T cell products. However, there has been little success in treating solid tumors, as clinical trials to date have yielded little to no responses and no improvement in survival. Current methods of CAR T cell production typically involve the use of viral vectors which can give rise to complications such as insertional mutagenesis, leading to gene silencing or oncogene activation. In addition, GMP-grade viral vector manufacturing can be expensive with lengthy wait times for new batches. Here we have developed a virus-free strategy in primary T cells that has eliminated the use of viral vectors through the use of CRISPR-Cas9 to precisely edit the chimeric antigen receptor into the TRAC gene1. Our method of virus free production begins through the generation of a double stranded DNA (dsDNA) template produced by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This template is then combined with a SpCas9-single guide RNA to create a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. Isolated human primary T cells from adult healthy donors are then nucleofected with the RNP and dsDNA template on day 2 of ex vivo expansion. Flow cytometry is then utilized to immunophenotype the cell product and analyze the percent of efficiency of CAR gene transfer. Within the cell product, the editing efficiencies are \u3e95% TCR knockout and 35% CAR+. Transcriptional profiling indicates that the virus-free CART cells have a favorable memory-like phenotype. In addition to our in vitro work, in vivo mice studies with anti-GD2 CART products demonstrate regression of GD2+ solid tumors upon virus-free CART treatment, showing similar potency and survival to viral-produced CAR T cells. The production of virus-free CAR T cells has high potential to enable the rapid and flexible manufacturing of highly defined and highly potent CAR T cell products for the treatment of solid tumors. 1 Mueller, K. et al. CRISPR-mediated insertion of a chimeric antigen receptor produces nonviral T cell products capable of inducing solid tumor regression. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.06.455489 (2021)

    Virus-Free CRISPR CAR T cells induce solid tumor regression

    Get PDF
    Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shown promising efficacy in treating hematologic malignancies and has led to the FDA-approval of three CAR T cell products. However, there has been little success in treating solid tumors, as clinical trials to date have yielded little to no responses and no improvement in survival. Current methods of CAR T cell production typically involve the use of viral vectors which can give rise to complications such as insertional mutagenesis, leading to gene silencing or oncogene activation. In addition, GMP-grade viral vector manufacturing can be expensive with lengthy wait times for new batches. Here we have developed a virus-free strategy in primary T cells that has eliminated the use of viral vectors through the use of CRISPR-Cas9 to precisely edit the chimeric antigen receptor into the TRAC gene1. Our method of virus free production begins through the generation of a double stranded DNA (dsDNA) template produced by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This template is then combined with a SpCas9-single guide RNA to create a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. Isolated human primary T cells from adult healthy donors are then nucleofected with the RNP and dsDNA template on day 2 of ex vivo expansion. Flow cytometry is then utilized to immunophenotype the cell product and analyze the percent of efficiency of CAR gene transfer. Within the cell product, the editing efficiencies are \u3e95% TCR knockout and 35% CAR+. Transcriptional profiling indicates that the virus-free CART cells have a favorable memory-like phenotype. In addition to our in vitro work, in vivo mice studies with anti-GD2 CART products demonstrate regression of GD2+ solid tumors upon virus-free CART treatment, showing similar potency and survival to viral-produced CAR T cells. The production of virus-free CAR T cells has high potential to enable the rapid and flexible manufacturing of highly defined and highly potent CAR T cell products for the treatment of solid tumors. 1 Mueller, K. et al. CRISPR-mediated insertion of a chimeric antigen receptor produces nonviral T cell products capable of inducing solid tumor regression. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.06.455489 (2021)

    BCL11A enhancer edited hematopoietic stem cells persist in rhesus monkeys without toxicity

    Get PDF
    Gene editing of the erythroid-specific BCL11A enhancer in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from sickle cell disease (SCD) patients induces fetal hemoglobin (HbF) without detectable toxicity as assessed by mouse xenotransplant. Here, we evaluated autologous engraftment and HbF induction potential of erythroid-specific BCL11A enhancer edited HSPCs in four non-human primates. We utilized a single guide RNA (sgRNA) with identical human and rhesus target sequences to disrupt a GATA1 binding site at the BCL11A +58 erythroid enhancer. Cas9 protein and sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) was electroporated into rhesus HSPCs, followed by autologous infusion after myeloablation. We found that gene edits persisted in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) for up to 101 weeks similarly for BCL11A enhancer or control locus (AAVS1) targeted cells. Biallelic BCL11A enhancer editing resulted in robust gamma-globin induction, with the highest levels observed during stress erythropoiesis. Indels were evenly distributed across PB and BM lineages. Off-target edits were not observed. Non-homologous end-joining repair alleles were enriched in engrafting HSCs. In summary, we find that edited HSCs can persist for at least 101 weeks post-transplant, and biallelic edited HSCs provide substantial HbF levels in PB red blood cells, together supporting further clinical translation of this approach

    Prediction and validation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell off-target editing in transplanted rhesus macaques

    No full text
    The programmable nuclease technology CRISPR-Cas9 has revolutionized gene editing in the last decade. Due to the risk of off-target editing, accurate and sensitive methods for off-target characterization are crucial prior to applying CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutically. Here, we utilized a rhesus macaque model to compare the predictive values of CIRCLE-seq, an in vitro off-target prediction method, with in silico prediction (ISP) based solely on genomic sequence comparisons. We use AmpliSeq HD error-corrected sequencing to validate offtarget sites predicted by CIRCLE-seq and ISP for a CD33 guide RNA (gRNA) with thousands of off-target sites predicted by ISP and CIRCLE-seq. We found poor correlation between the sites predicted by the two methods. When almost 500 sites predicted by each method were analyzed by error-corrected sequencing of hematopoietic cells following transplantation, 19 off-target sites revealed insertion or deletion mutations. Of these sites, 8 were predicted by both methods, 8 by CIRCLE-seq only, and 3 by ISP only. The levels of cells with these off-target edits exhibited no expansion or abnormal behavior in vivo in animals followed for up to 2 years. In addition, we utilized an unbiased method termed CAST-seq to search for translocations between the on-target site and off-target sites present in animals following transplantation, detecting one specific translocation that persisted in blood cells for at least 1 year following transplantation. In conclusion, neither CIRCLE-seq or ISP predicted all sites, and a combination of careful gRNA design, followed by screening for predicted off-target sites in target cells by multiple methods, may be required for optimizing safety of clinical development.N

    Image_3_CRISPR-Cas9-AAV versus lentivector transduction for genome modification of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency hematopoietic stem cells.tif

    No full text
    IntroductionEx vivo gene therapy for treatment of Inborn errors of Immunity (IEIs) have demonstrated significant clinical benefit in multiple Phase I/II clinical trials. Current approaches rely on engineered retroviral vectors to randomly integrate copy(s) of gene-of-interest in autologous hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) genome permanently to provide gene function in transduced HSPCs and their progenies. To circumvent concerns related to potential genotoxicities due to the random vector integrations in HSPCs, targeted correction with CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing offers improved precision for functional correction of multiple IEIs. MethodsWe compare the two approaches for integration of IL2RG transgene for functional correction of HSPCs from patients with X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID-X1 or XSCID); delivery via current clinical lentivector (LV)-IL2RG versus targeted insertion (TI) of IL2RG via homology-directed repair (HDR) when using an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-IL2RG donor following double-strand DNA break at the endogenous IL2RG locus. Results and discussionIn vitro differentiation of LV- or TI-treated XSCID HSPCs similarly overcome differentiation block into Pre-T-I and Pre-T-II lymphocytes but we observed significantly superior development of NK cells when corrected by TI (40.7% versus 4.1%, p = 0.0099). Transplants into immunodeficient mice demonstrated robust engraftment (8.1% and 23.3% in bone marrow) for LV- and TI-IL2RG HSPCs with efficient T cell development following TI-IL2RG in all four patients’ HSPCs. Extensive specificity analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 editing with rhAmpSeq covering 82 predicted off-target sites found no evidence of indels in edited cells before (in vitro) or following transplant, in stark contrast to LV’s non-targeted vector integration sites. Together, the improved efficiency and safety of IL2RG correction via CRISPR-Cas9-based TI approach provides a strong rationale for a clinical trial for treatment of XSCID patients.</p

    Image_1_CRISPR-Cas9-AAV versus lentivector transduction for genome modification of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency hematopoietic stem cells.tif

    No full text
    IntroductionEx vivo gene therapy for treatment of Inborn errors of Immunity (IEIs) have demonstrated significant clinical benefit in multiple Phase I/II clinical trials. Current approaches rely on engineered retroviral vectors to randomly integrate copy(s) of gene-of-interest in autologous hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) genome permanently to provide gene function in transduced HSPCs and their progenies. To circumvent concerns related to potential genotoxicities due to the random vector integrations in HSPCs, targeted correction with CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing offers improved precision for functional correction of multiple IEIs. MethodsWe compare the two approaches for integration of IL2RG transgene for functional correction of HSPCs from patients with X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID-X1 or XSCID); delivery via current clinical lentivector (LV)-IL2RG versus targeted insertion (TI) of IL2RG via homology-directed repair (HDR) when using an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-IL2RG donor following double-strand DNA break at the endogenous IL2RG locus. Results and discussionIn vitro differentiation of LV- or TI-treated XSCID HSPCs similarly overcome differentiation block into Pre-T-I and Pre-T-II lymphocytes but we observed significantly superior development of NK cells when corrected by TI (40.7% versus 4.1%, p = 0.0099). Transplants into immunodeficient mice demonstrated robust engraftment (8.1% and 23.3% in bone marrow) for LV- and TI-IL2RG HSPCs with efficient T cell development following TI-IL2RG in all four patients’ HSPCs. Extensive specificity analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 editing with rhAmpSeq covering 82 predicted off-target sites found no evidence of indels in edited cells before (in vitro) or following transplant, in stark contrast to LV’s non-targeted vector integration sites. Together, the improved efficiency and safety of IL2RG correction via CRISPR-Cas9-based TI approach provides a strong rationale for a clinical trial for treatment of XSCID patients.</p

    Image_2_CRISPR-Cas9-AAV versus lentivector transduction for genome modification of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency hematopoietic stem cells.tif

    No full text
    IntroductionEx vivo gene therapy for treatment of Inborn errors of Immunity (IEIs) have demonstrated significant clinical benefit in multiple Phase I/II clinical trials. Current approaches rely on engineered retroviral vectors to randomly integrate copy(s) of gene-of-interest in autologous hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) genome permanently to provide gene function in transduced HSPCs and their progenies. To circumvent concerns related to potential genotoxicities due to the random vector integrations in HSPCs, targeted correction with CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing offers improved precision for functional correction of multiple IEIs. MethodsWe compare the two approaches for integration of IL2RG transgene for functional correction of HSPCs from patients with X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID-X1 or XSCID); delivery via current clinical lentivector (LV)-IL2RG versus targeted insertion (TI) of IL2RG via homology-directed repair (HDR) when using an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-IL2RG donor following double-strand DNA break at the endogenous IL2RG locus. Results and discussionIn vitro differentiation of LV- or TI-treated XSCID HSPCs similarly overcome differentiation block into Pre-T-I and Pre-T-II lymphocytes but we observed significantly superior development of NK cells when corrected by TI (40.7% versus 4.1%, p = 0.0099). Transplants into immunodeficient mice demonstrated robust engraftment (8.1% and 23.3% in bone marrow) for LV- and TI-IL2RG HSPCs with efficient T cell development following TI-IL2RG in all four patients’ HSPCs. Extensive specificity analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 editing with rhAmpSeq covering 82 predicted off-target sites found no evidence of indels in edited cells before (in vitro) or following transplant, in stark contrast to LV’s non-targeted vector integration sites. Together, the improved efficiency and safety of IL2RG correction via CRISPR-Cas9-based TI approach provides a strong rationale for a clinical trial for treatment of XSCID patients.</p
    corecore