43 research outputs found

    Evidence for nucleotide excision repair as a modifying factor of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-mediated innate chloroethylnitrosourea resistance in human tumor cell lines

    Get PDF
    SUMMARY We examined the O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein as well as MGMT activity levels and the excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency gene, ERCC2 (XPD), protein levels in 14 human tumor cell lines not selected for chloroethylnitrosourea (CENU) resistance. These results were compared with 1,3-bis-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) cytotoxicity and UV light sensitivity. MGMT protein correlated significantly with MGMT activity (r Ļ­ 0.9497, p Ļ­ 0.0001). There was no significant linear correlation between BCNU cytotoxicity and MGMT content as determined by both Western analysis (r Ļ­ 0.139, p Ļ­ 0.6348) and activity assay (r Ļ­ 0.131, p Ļ­ 0.6515). However, MGMT-rich cell lines were found to be more resistant than MGMT-poor cell lines to BCNU (t Ļ­ 2.2375, p Ļ­ 0.0225) but not to UV (t Ļ­ 1.1734, p Ļ­ 0.1317). Furthermore, the most BCNU-sensitive cell lines were all MGMT-poor. UV sensitivity was significantly correlated to BCNU cytotoxicity (r Ļ­ 0.858, p Ļ­ 0.0001). Significant correlations were found between ERCC2 protein levels and BCNU cytotoxicity (r Ļ­ 0.786, p Ļ­ 0.0009) or UV sensitivity (r Ļ­ 0.874, p Ļ­ 0.0001). Our results confirm that MGMT plays an important role in CENU resistance, but not in UV resistance. The correlation of UV sensitivity with BCNU cytotoxicity suggests that nucleotide excision repair is an important modifying factor of MGMT-mediated innate CENU resistance in human tumor cell lines, especially in highly resistant cell lines. ERCC2 may be implicated in this process

    Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

    Get PDF
    Background Aromatase inhibitors are a standard of care for hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We investigated whether the selective oestrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant could improve progression-free survival compared with anastrozole in postmenopausal patients who had not received previous endocrine therapy. Methods In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind trial, we recruited eligible patients with histologically confirmed oestrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive, or both, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer from 113 academic hospitals and community centres in 20 countries. Eligible patients were endocrine therapy-naive, with WHO performance status 0ā€“2, and at least one measurable or non-measurable lesion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular injection; on days 0, 14, 28, then every 28 days thereafter) or anastrozole (1 mg orally daily) using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1Ā·1, intervention by surgery or radiotherapy because of disease deterioration, or death from any cause, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of randomised treatment (including placebo). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01602380. Findings Between Oct 17, 2012, and July 11, 2014, 524 patients were enrolled to this study. Of these, 462 patients were randomised (230 to receive fulvestrant and 232 to receive anastrozole). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the fulvestrant group than in the anastrozole group (hazard ratio [HR] 0Ā·797, 95% CI 0Ā·637ā€“0Ā·999, p=0Ā·0486). Median progression-free survival was 16Ā·6 months (95% CI 13Ā·83ā€“20Ā·99) in the fulvestrant group versus 13Ā·8 months (11Ā·99ā€“16Ā·59) in the anastrozole group. The most common adverse events were arthralgia (38 [17%] in the fulvestrant group vs 24 [10%] in the anastrozole group) and hot flushes (26 [11%] in the fulvestrant group vs 24 [10%] in the anastrozole group). 16 (7%) of 228 patients in in the fulvestrant group and 11 (5%) of 232 patients in the anastrozole group discontinued because of adverse events. Interpretation Fulvestrant has superior efficacy and is a preferred treatment option for patients with hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received previous endocrine therapy compared with a third-generation aromatase inhibitor, a standard of care for first-line treatment of these patients

    Different Impact of Excision Repair Cross-Complementing Group 1 on Survival

    No full text

    Effect of Tamoxifen After Chemotherapy in Hormone Receptorā€“Positive, Node-Negative Breast Cancer

    No full text

    Docetaxel Plus Cyclophosphamide in Adjuvant Breast Cancer

    No full text

    Small Molecules, Inhibitors of DNA-PK, Targeting DNA Repair, and Beyond

    Get PDF
    Many current chemotherapies function by damaging genomic DNA in rapidly dividing cells ultimately leading to cell death. This therapeutic approach differentially targets cancer cells that generally display rapid cell division compared to normal tissue cells. However, although these treatments are initially effective in arresting tumor growth and reducing tumor burden, resistance and disease progression eventually occur. A major mechanism underlying this resistance is increased levels of cellular DNA repair. Most cells have complex mechanisms in place to repair DNA damage that occurs due to environmental exposures or normal metabolic processes. These systems, initially overwhelmed when faced with chemotherapy induced DNA damage, become more efficient under constant selective pressure and as a result chemotherapies become less effective. Thus, inhibiting DNA repair pathways using target specific small molecule inhibitors may overcome cellular resistance to DNA damaging chemotherapies. Non-homologous end joining a major mechanism for the repair of double-strand breaks (DSB) in DNA is regulated in part by the serine/threonine kinase, DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). The DNA-PK holoenzyme acts as a scaffold protein tethering broken DNA ends and recruiting other repair molecules. It also has enzymatic activity that may be involved in DNA damage signaling. Because of itsā€™ central role in repair of DSBs, DNA-PK has been the focus of a number of small molecule studies. In these studies specific DNA-PK inhibitors have shown efficacy in synergizing chemotherapies in vitro. However, compounds currently known to specifically inhibit DNA-PK are limited by poor pharmacokinetics: these compounds have poor solubility and have high metabolic lability in vivo leading to short serum half-lives. Future improvement in DNA-PK inhibition will likely be achieved by designing new molecules based on the recently reported crystallographic structure of DNA-PK. Computer based drug design will not only assist in identifying novel functional moieties to replace the metabolically labile morpholino group but will also facilitate the design of molecules to target the DNA-PKcs/Ku80 interface or one of the autophosphorylation sites

    Chlorozotocin: MECHANISM OF REDUCED BONE MARROW TOXICITY IN MICE

    No full text
    Chlorozotocin is a chloroethyl nitrosourea with a glucose carrier that has curative activity for the murine L1210 leukemia, but is nonmyelosuppressive in mice. To determine the mechanism for this unique property of reduced bone marrow toxicity, comparative studies were conducted with chlorozotocin and CCNU, a myelotoxic chloroethyl nitrosourea. Suspensions of L1210 leukemia and murine bone marrow cells were incubated for 2 h with 0.1 mM [(14)C]-chloroethyl chlorozotocin or CCNU. Chlorozotocin demonstrated a fourfold increased covalent binding of the chloroethyl group to L1210 nuclei when compared to equimolar CCNU. Chlorozotocin alkylation of L1210 cells resulted in the binding of 57 pmol of [(14)C]ethyl group/mg of DNA, which represented a 2.3-fold increased alkylation when compared to CCNU. In marked contrast, the binding of the chloroethyl group to bone marrow nuclei was equivalent for both drugs. In addition, chlorozotocin alkylation of murine bone marrow DNA, 45 pmol of [(14)C]ethyl group/mg of DNA, was equivalent to that of CCNU. The ratio of L1210:bone marrow DNA alkylation was 1.3 for chlorozotocin compared to 0.6 for CCNU. The intracellular carbamoylation of L1210 and bone marrow protein by CCNU was 400- to 600-fold greater than that produced by chlorozotocin. After a 2-h exposure to 0.1, 0.05, or 0.01 mM drug, both chlorozotocin and CCNU produced a reduction in the cloning efficiency of L1210 cells that was dose dependent. However, chlorozotocin was significantly more cytotoxic than CCNU at all three molar concentrations (P < 0.01). Chlorozotocin, 0.1 mM, reduced L1210 DNA synthesis to 1% of control by 48 h, in contrast to 16% with equimolar CCNU (P < 0.01). In mice bearing 10(5) L1210 cells, chlorozotocin produced its optimal antitumor activity (332% increased life span [ILS]) at doses of 48-64 Ī¼mol/kg, with >50% indefinite survivors. In contrast, CCNU at the same molar doses resulted in only a 191% ILS; a CCNU dose of 128 Ī¼mol/kg was required for comparable optimal L1210 antitumor activity, 413% ILS. On a molar basis, the dose of chlorozotocin that produced optimal in vivo L1210 antitumor activity was one-third to one-half that of CCNU. Chlorozotocin, unlike CCNU, produced no murine bone marrow toxicity at its optimal therapeutic dose. This unique combination of antitumor activity without myelosuppression can be correlated with the advantageous ratio of L1210:bone marrow in vitro DNA alkylation by chlorozotocin (1.3) as compared to equimolar CCNU (0.6)
    corecore