Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with valvular heart disease: comparison with patients affected by ischaemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. The InSync/InSync ICD Italian Registry

AimsTo analyse the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with valvular heart disease (a subset not specifically investigated in randomized controlled trials) in comparison with ischaemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy patients.Methods and resultsPatients enrolled in a national registry were evaluated during a median follow-up of 16 months after CRT implant. Patients with valvular heart disease treated with CRT (n = 108) in comparison with ischaemic heart disease (n = 737) and dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 635) patients presented: (i) a higher prevalence of chronic atrial fibrillation, with atrioventricular node ablation performed in around half of the cases; (ii) a similar clinical and echocardiographic profile at baseline; (iii) a similar improvement of LVEF and a similar reduction in ventricular volumes at 6-12 months; (iv) a favourable clinical response at 12 months with an improvement of the clinical composite score similar to that occurring in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and more pronounced than that observed in patients with ischaemic heart disease; (v) a long-term outcome, in term of freedom from death or heart transplantation, similar to patients affected by ischaemic heart disease and basically more severe than that of patients affected by dilated cardiomyopathy.ConclusionIn 'real world' clinical practice, CRT appears to be effective also in patients with valvular heart disease. However, in this group of patients the outcome after CRT does not precisely overlap any of the two other groups of patients, for which much more data are currently available

Prognostic role of post-infarction C-reactive protein in patients undergoing implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators: design of the C-reactive protein Assessment after Myocardial Infarction to GUide Implantation of DEfibrillator (CAMI GUIDE) study

Background Patients at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) after myocardial infarction (MI) can currently be offered effective means of prevention, such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). However, predictors of SCD able to identify those patients who are at higher risk are still lacking. Whether C-reactive protein (CRP), a serum inflammatory marker with established prognostic accuracy after MI, can also be a predictor of SCD is unclear. Methods The CAMI GUIDE study is designed to evaluate the prognostic role of CRP in patients undergoing ICD implantation after MI according to MADIT II criteria (i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction <= 30%). CAMI GUIDE is a prospective observational study aimed at assessing the role of CRP in the risk-stratification of SCD after MI. CRP will be measured on the basis of a pre-specified cut-off value of 3 mg/l, before and 1 month after ICD implantation; clinical follow-up will last 24 months. The primary endpoint is the combined rate of SCD or fast ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Secondary endpoints will be total mortality, death due to acute coronary syndromes, death from pump failure, non-fatal MI, coronary revascularization, hospitalization for congestive heart failure or unstable angina and inappropriate ICD shocks. Twenty-four Italian centers will participate in enrolment of the 290 patients planned according to power analysis. Conclusions The CAMI GUIDE study will assess the predictive role of CRP in SCD in patients with previous MI undergoing ICD implantation. Its results will improve risk stratification, thereby enabling better-tailored and more cost-effective therapies to be undertaken in those patients whose need is greatest. J Cardiovasc Med 8: 293-299 (C) 2007 Italian Federation of Cardiology

Who are the long-QT syndrome patients who receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and what happens to them?: Data from the European Long-QT syndrome implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (LQTS ICD) registry

Background-: A rapidly growing number of long-QT syndrome (LQTS) patients are being treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). ICDs may pose problems, especially in the young. We sought to determine the characteristics of the LQTS patients receiving an ICD, the indications, and the aftermath. Methods And Results-: The study population included 233 patients. Beginning in 2002, data were collected prospectively. Female patients (77%) and LQT3 patients (22% of genotype positive) were overrepresented; mean QTc was 516±65 milliseconds; mean age at implantation was 30±17 years; and genotype was known in 59% of patients. Unexpectedly, 9% of patients were asymptomatic before implantation. Asymptomatic patients, almost absent among LQT1 and LQT2 patients, represented 45% of LQT3 patients. Patients with cardiac symptoms made up 91% of all study participants, but only 44% had cardiac arrest before ICD implantation. In addition, 41% of patients received an ICD without having first been on LQTS therapy. During follow-up, 4.6±3.2 years, at least 1 appropriate shock was received by 28% of patients, and adverse events occurred in 25%. Appropriate ICD therapies were predicted by age 500 milliseconds, prior cardiac arrest, and cardiac events despite therapy; within 7 years, appropriate shocks occurred in no patients with none of these factors and in 70% of those with all factors. Conclusions-: Reflecting previous concepts, ICDs were implanted in some LQTS patients whose high risk now appears questionable. Refined criteria for implantation, reassessment of pros and cons, ICD reprogramming, and consideration for other existing therapeutic options are necessary