17 research outputs found

    Movements and Area Use of Belugas, Delphinapterus leucas, in a Subarctic Alaskan Estuary

    Get PDF
    Seasonal movements of 14 belugas in Cook Inlet, Alaska, were monitored by satellite telemetry between July and March in 2000–03. Whales used waters in the upper Cook Inlet intensively between summer and late autumn and dispersed to mid-inlet offshore waters during winter months. All whales remained in Cook Inlet the entire time they were tracked, and several whales were tracked through March. During summer and early fall, movements were clearly concentrated in specific areas, generally river mouths or bays, where whales were likely feeding on fish runs. Average daily travel distances ranged from 11 to 30 km per day. Monthly home ranges, estimated using the 95% kernel probability distribution of average daily positions, were smallest in August (982 km2), increased throughout autumn, and peaked in winter (reaching approximately 5000 km2). The seasonal variation in distribution and movement patterns displayed by belugas in Cook Inlet affect the sighting rates and seasonal abundance estimates obtained for this depleted population.Les dĂ©placements saisonniers de 14 bĂ©lugas du dĂ©troit de Cook, en Alaska, ont fait l’objet d’une surveillance au moyen d’un Ă©metteur par satellite entre les mois de juillet et mars 2000 Ă  2003. Cela a permis de remarquer que les baleines se tenaient beaucoup dans les eaux de la partie supĂ©rieure du dĂ©troit de Cook de l’étĂ© jusqu’à la fin de l’automne, mais qu’elles se dispersaient dans les eaux du large du milieu du dĂ©troit pendant les mois d’hiver. Toutes les baleines sont restĂ©es dans le dĂ©troit de Cook pendant toute la durĂ©e de surveillance, et plusieurs baleines ont Ă©tĂ© suivies jusqu’au mois de mars. L’étĂ© et au dĂ©but de l’automne, les dĂ©placements Ă©taient nettement concentrĂ©s dans des endroits spĂ©cifiques, gĂ©nĂ©ralement dans les embouchures ou les baies, oĂč les baleines se nourrissaient probablement de poissons. En moyenne, les baleines se dĂ©plaçaient sur des distances variant de 11 Ă  30 km par jour. C’est en aoĂ»t que le domaine vital mensuel, estimĂ© par la mĂ©thode du noyau en fonction d’une densitĂ© de probabilitĂ© de 95 % des positions quotidiennes moyennes, Ă©tait le plus petit (982 km2), aprĂšs quoi il augmentait Ă  l’automne et culminait l’hiver (oĂč il atteignait environ 5 000 km2). La variation saisonniĂšre caractĂ©risant la rĂ©partition et les dĂ©placements des bĂ©lugas dans le dĂ©troit de Cook exerce une influence sur le taux d’observations et sur les estimations d’abondance saisonniĂšre obtenues pour cette population en dĂ©clin

    Resighting of a Narwhal (Monodon monoceros) Instrumented with a Satellite Transmitter

    Get PDF
    On 9 August 2001, a male narwhal (Monodon monoceros) was instrumented with a satellite transmitter attached to the dorsal side of the tusk in Creswell Bay on Somerset Island in the Canadian High Arctic. The whale was identified five years later, on 22 June 2006, in a photo of a group of narwhals taken from the ice edge in Lancaster Sound. Examination of the position of the transmitter on the tusk showed that the tusk had grown approximately 17 cm in the five-year period. The transmitter was still located on the dorsal side of the tusk and this fact, together with the length of spiral grains at the position of the tag, indicates that the tusk had not turned over (rotated) in the five-year period. The whale was photographed on its spring migration back to the original summer ground where it had been tagged. This resighting confirms evidence for site fidelity of narwhals, as the individual maintained the same migratory schedule and route observed for narwhals from previous satellite tracking studies in Creswell Bay.Le 9 aoĂ»t 2001, un Ă©metteur satellite a Ă©tĂ© posĂ© sur un narval mĂąle (Monodon monoceros), plus prĂ©cisĂ©ment du cĂŽtĂ© dorsal de sa dĂ©fense et ce, dans la baie Creswell, Ă  l’üle Somerset, dans l’ExtrĂȘme-Arctique canadien. Cinq ans plus tard, soit le 22 juin 2006, la baleine a Ă©tĂ© aperçue dans la photo d’un groupe de narvals prise Ă  partir de la lisiĂšre de glaces du dĂ©troit de Lancaster. L’examen de l’emplacement de l’émetteur sur la dĂ©fense a permis de constater que la dĂ©fense avait grandi d’environ 17 cm pendant la pĂ©riode de cinq ans. L’émetteur se trouvait toujours du cĂŽtĂ© dorsal de la dĂ©fense et cela, alliĂ© Ă  la longueur des fibres torses Ă  l’emplacement de l’étiquette, indique que la dĂ©fense n’avait pas subi de rotation pendant la pĂ©riode de cinq ans. La baleine a Ă©tĂ© photographiĂ©e pendant sa migration printaniĂšre de retour vers l’endroit oĂč elle avait d’abord Ă©tĂ© Ă©tiquetĂ©e l’étĂ©. Ce repĂ©rage permet de confirmer les preuves relativement Ă  la fidĂ©litĂ© des narvals Ă  leurs emplacements, car cette baleine avait maintenu les mĂȘmes horaire et trajet migratoires observĂ©s chez les narvals Ă  partir d’autres Ă©tudes de repĂ©rage par satellite rĂ©alisĂ©es dans la baie Creswell

    From Greenland to Canada in Ten Days: Tracks of Bowhead Whales, Balaena mysticetus, across Baffin Bay

    Get PDF
    Five bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) were instrumented with satellite transmitters in northwestern Disko Bay, West Greenland, in May 2001. Best results were obtained when tags were deployed with a pole rather than a pneumatic gun. At least three of the tagged whales remained in the northwestern part of the bay for one to two weeks after tagging. A male and a female whale moved from Disko Bay to northern Canada. They left Disko Bay 11 days apart and took different routes across Baffin Bay to the southern part of the North Water polynya, just east of the entrance to Lancaster Sound. The whales crossed the central part of Baffin Bay relatively rapidly (travel time of 9-10 days, 3.1 and 4.5 km/h). Dive behaviour of one whale was monitored and showed changes in dive depths, dive rates, and surfacing times in different localities, indicating behavioural changes probably related to feeding. The whales were presumably feeding in both Disko Bay in May and in the southern part of the North Water (southeast of Bylot Island) in June. This study confirms whalers' observations that bowhead whales move between West Greenland and the east coast of Baffin Island.En mai 2001, cinq baleines boréales (Balaena mysticetus) ont été équipées d'émetteurs spatiaux dans le nord-ouest de la baie de Disko (Groenland occidental). Les meilleurs résultats ont été obtenus lorsque les marqueurs ont été apposés avec une perche plutÎt qu'avec un fusil à air comprimé. Au moins trois des baleines marquées sont restées dans la partie nord-ouest de la baie pendant une à deux semaines aprÚs le marquage. Deux individus, un mùle et une femelle, se sont déplacés de la baie de Disko au nord du Canada. Ils ont quitté la baie à 11 jours d'écart et ont emprunté des trajets différents pour traverser la baie de Baffin et rejoindre la partie méridionale de la polynie de l'Eau du Nord, située juste à l'est de l'entrée du détroit de Lancaster. Les baleines ont traversé la partie centrale de la baie de Baffin assez vite (en 9 et 10 jours, soit 3,1 et 4,5 km/h). On a suivi le comportement de plongée d'une baleine, qui a montré des changements dans la profondeur des plongées, leur fréquence et le temps en surface à divers endroits, révélant des modifications du comportement probablement associées au nourrissage. On suppose que les baleines s'alimentaient dans la baie de Disko en mai aussi bien que dans la partie méridionale de l'Eau du Nord (au sud-est de l'ßle Bylot) en juin. Cette étude confirme les observations des baleiniers à l'effet que les baleines boréales se déplacent entre l'ouest du Groenland et la cÎte est de l'ßle de Baffin

    Deep-ocean predation by a high Arctic cetacean

    Get PDF
    A bioenergetic model for two narwhal (Monodon monoceros) sub-populations was developed to quantify daily gross energy requirements and estimate the biomass of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) needed to sustain the sub-populations for their 5-month stay on wintering grounds in Baffin Bay. Whales in two separate wintering grounds were estimated to require 700 tonnes (s.e. 300) and 90 tonnes (s.e. 40) of Greenland halibut per day, assuming a diet of 50% Greenland halibut. Mean densities and length distributions of Greenland halibut inside and outside of the narwhal wintering grounds were correlated with predicted whale predation levels based on diving behavior. The difference in Greenland halibut biomass between an area with high predation and a comparable area without whales, approximately 19 000 tonnes, corresponded well with the predicted biomass removed by the narwhal sub-population on a diet of 50–75% Greenland halibut

    Trends in bowhead whales in West Greenland:aerial surveys vs. genetic capture-recapture analyses

    No full text
    We contrast two methods for estimating the trends of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in West Greenland: (1) double platform visual aerial survey, corrected for missed sightings and the time the whales are available at the surface; and (2) a genetic capture-recapture approach based on a 14-yr-long biopsy sampling program in Disko Bay. The aerial survey covered 39,000 km2 and resulted in 58 sightings, yielding an abundance estimate of 744 whales (CV = 0.34, 95% CI: 357–1,461). The genetic method relied on determining sex, mitochondrial haplotypes and genotypes of nine microsatellite markers. Based on samples from a total of 427 individuals, with 11 recaptures from previous years in 2013, this resulted in an estimate of 1,538 whales (CV = 0.24, 95% CI: 827–2,249). While the aerial survey is considered a snapshot of the local spring aggregation in Disko Bay, the genetic approach estimates the abundance of the source of this aggregation. As the whales in Disko Bay primarily are adult females that do not visit the bay annually, the genetic method would presumably yield higher estimates. The studies indicate that an increase in abundance observed between 1998 and 2006 has leveled off.</p

    Range contraction and increasing isolation of a polar bear subpopulation in an era of sea ice loss.

    No full text
    Climate change is expected to result in range shifts and habitat fragmentation for many species. In the Arctic, loss of sea ice will reduce barriers to dispersal or eliminate movement corridors, resulting in increased connectivity or geographic isolation with sweeping implications for conservation. We used satellite telemetry, data from individually marked animals (research and harvest), and microsatellite genetic data to examine changes in geographic range, emigration, and interpopulation connectivity of the Baffin Bay (BB) polar bear (Ursus maritimus) subpopulation over a 25‐year period of sea‐ice loss. Satellite telemetry collected from n = 43 (1991–1995) and 38 (2009–2015) adult females revealed a significant contraction in subpopulation range size (95% bivariate normal kernel range) in most months and seasons, with the most marked reduction being a 70% decline in summer from 716,000 km2 (SE 58,000) to 211,000 km2 (SE 23,000) (p < .001). Between the 1990s and 2000s, there was a significant shift northward during the on‐ice seasons (2.6° shift in winter median latitude, 1.1° shift in spring median latitude) and a significant range contraction in the ice‐free summers. Bears in the 2000s were less likely to leave BB, with significant reductions in the numbers of bears moving into Davis Strait (DS) in winter and Lancaster Sound (LS) in summer. Harvest recoveries suggested both short and long‐term fidelity to BB remained high over both periods (83–99% of marked bears remained in BB). Genetic analyses using eight polymorphic microsatellites confirmed a previously documented differentiation between BB, DS, and LS; yet weakly differentiated BB from Kane Basin (KB) for the first time. Our results provide the first multiple lines of evidence for an increasingly geographically and functionally isolated subpopulation of polar bears in the context of long‐term sea‐ice loss. This may be indicative of future patterns for other polar bear subpopulations under climate change

    Range contraction and increasing isolation of a polar bear subpopulation in an era of sea ice loss

    No full text
    Climate change is expected to result in range shifts and habitat fragmentation for many species. In the Arctic, loss of sea ice will reduce barriers to dispersal or eliminate movement corridors, resulting in increased connectivity or geographic isolation with sweeping implications for conservation. We used satellite telemetry, data from individually marked animals (research and harvest), and microsatellite genetic data to examine changes in geographic range, emigration, and interpopulation connectivity of the Baffin Bay (BB) polar bear (Ursus maritimus) subpopulation over a 25‐year period of sea‐ice loss. Satellite telemetry collected from n = 43 (1991–1995) and 38 (2009–2015) adult females revealed a significant contraction in subpopulation range size (95% bivariate normal kernel range) in most months and seasons, with the most marked reduction being a 70% decline in summer from 716,000 km2 (SE 58,000) to 211,000 km2 (SE 23,000) (p < .001). Between the 1990s and 2000s, there was a significant shift northward during the on‐ice seasons (2.6° shift in winter median latitude, 1.1° shift in spring median latitude) and a significant range contraction in the ice‐free summers. Bears in the 2000s were less likely to leave BB, with significant reductions in the numbers of bears moving into Davis Strait (DS) in winter and Lancaster Sound (LS) in summer. Harvest recoveries suggested both short and long‐term fidelity to BB remained high over both periods (83–99% of marked bears remained in BB). Genetic analyses using eight polymorphic microsatellites confirmed a previously documented differentiation between BB, DS, and LS; yet weakly differentiated BB from Kane Basin (KB) for the first time. Our results provide the first multiple lines of evidence for an increasingly geographically and functionally isolated subpopulation of polar bears in the context of long‐term sea‐ice loss. This may be indicative of future patterns for other polar bear subpopulations under climate change

    Data from: Range contraction and increasing isolation of a polar bear subpopulation in an era of sea-ice loss

    No full text
    Climate change is expected to result in range shifts and habitat fragmentation for many species. In the Arctic, loss of sea ice will reduce barriers to dispersal or eliminate movement corridors, resulting in increased connectivity or geographic isolation with sweeping implications for conservation. We used satellite telemetry, data from individually marked animals (research and harvest), and microsatellite genetic data to examine changes in geographic range, emigration, and interpopulation connectivity of the Baffin Bay (BB) polar bear (Ursus maritimus) subpopulation over a 25-year period of sea-ice loss. Satellite telemetry collected from n = 43 (1991–1995) and 38 (2009–2015) adult females revealed a significant contraction in subpopulation range size (95% bivariate normal kernel range) in most months and seasons, with the most marked reduction being a 70% decline in summer from 716,000 km2 (SE 58,000) to 211,000 km2 (SE 23,000) (p < .001). Between the 1990s and 2000s, there was a significant shift northward during the on-ice seasons (2.6° shift in winter median latitude, 1.1° shift in spring median latitude) and a significant range contraction in the ice-free summers. Bears in the 2000s were less likely to leave BB, with significant reductions in the numbers of bears moving into Davis Strait (DS) in winter and Lancaster Sound (LS) in summer. Harvest recoveries suggested both short and long-term fidelity to BB remained high over both periods (83–99% of marked bears remained in BB). Genetic analyses using eight polymorphic microsatellites confirmed a previously documented differentiation between BB, DS, and LS; yet weakly differentiated BB from Kane Basin (KB) for the first time. Our results provide the first multiple lines of evidence for an increasingly geographically and functionally isolated subpopulation of polar bears in the context of long-term sea-ice loss. This may be indicative of future patterns for other polar bear subpopulations under climate change
    corecore