GLP-1 and glucose tolerance after sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Although GLP-1 has been suggested as a major factor for the marked improvement of glucose tolerance commonly seen after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), several observations challenge this hypothesis. To better understand the role of GLP-1 in the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) long term after SG in humans, we conducted two separate cross-sectional studies: 1) the GLP-1 response to a standardized mixed liquid meal (SMLM) was compared in subjects with T2DM antedating SG but with different long-term (>2 years) T2DM outcomes (remission, relapse, or lack of remission) (study 1) and 2) the effect of GLP-1 receptor blockade with exendin (9-39) on glucose tolerance was examined in subjects with T2DM antedating surgery, who had undergone SG and presented with long-term T2DM remission (study 2). In study 1, we observed a comparable GLP-1 response to the SMLM regardless of the post-SG outcome of T2DM. In study 2, the blockade of GLP-1 action resulted in impaired insulin secretion but limited deterioration of glucose tolerance. Thus, our data suggest the enhanced GLP-1 secretion observed long term after SG is neither sufficient nor critical to maintain normal glucose tolerance in subjects with T2DM antedating the surgery

Budget Impact Analysis of Molecular Lymph Node Staging Versus Conventional Histopathology Staging in Colorectal Carcinoma

Background: The presence of lymph node (LN) metastasis is a critical prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and is also an indicator for adjuvant chemotherapy. The gold standard (GS) technique for LN diagnosis and staging is based on the analysis of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, but its sensitivity is low. As a result, patients may not be properly diagnosed and some may have local recurrence or distant metastases after curative-intent surgery. Many of these diagnostic and treatment problems could be avoided if the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay (OSNA) was used rather than the GS technique. OSNA is a fast, automated, standardised, highly sensitive, quantitative technique for detecting LN metastases. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the budget impact of introducing OSNA LN analysis in early-stage CRC patients in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Methods: A budget impact analysis comparing two scenarios (GS vs. OSNA) was developed within the Spanish NHS framework over a 3-year time frame (2017-2019). The patient population consisted of newly diagnosed CRC patients undergoing surgical treatment, and the following costs were included: initial surgery, pathological diagnosis, staging, follow-up expenses, systemic treatment and surgery after recurrence. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Using OSNA instead of the GS would have saved 1,509,182, 6,854,501 and 10,814,082 during the first, second and third years of the analysis, respectively, because patients incur additional costs in later years, leading to savings of more than 19 million for the NHS over the 3-year time horizon. Conclusions: Introducing OSNA in CRC LN analysis may represent not only an economic benefit for the NHS but also a clinical benefit for CRC patients since a more accurate staging could be performed, thus avoiding unnecessary treatments

A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.

Background Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is widely used. However, robust evidence to conclude that laparoscopic surgery and open surgery have similar outcomes in rectal cancer is lacking. A trial was designed to compare 3-year rates of cancer recurrence in the pelvic or perineal area (locoregional recurrence) and survival after laparoscopic and open resection of rectal cancer. Methods In this international trial conducted in 30 hospitals, we randomly assigned patients with a solitary adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 15 cm of the anal verge, not invading adjacent tissues, and without distant metastases to undergo either laparoscopic or open surgery in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point was locoregional recurrence 3 years after the index surgery. Secondary end points included disease-free and overall survival. Results A total of 1044 patients were included (699 in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 345 in the open-surgery group). At 3 years, the locoregional recurrence rate was 5.0% in the two groups (difference, 0 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI], −2.6 to 2.6). Disease-free survival rates were 74.8% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 70.8% in the open-surgery group (difference, 4.0 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.9 to 9.9). Overall survival rates were 86.7% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 83.6% in the open-surgery group (difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.6 to 7.8). Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer was associated with rates of locoregional recurrence and disease-free and overall survival similar to those for open surgery. (Funded by Ethicon Endo-Surgery Europe and others; COLOR II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297791.

Adjuvant therapy sparing in rectal cancer achieving complete response after chemoradiation

AIM: To evaluate the long-term results of conventional chemoradiotherapy and laparoscopic mesorectal excision in rectal adenocarcinoma patients without adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum staged cT3-T4 by endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging received neoadjuvant continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil for five weeks and concomitant radiotherapy. Laparoscopic surgery was planned after 5-8 wk. Patients diagnosed with ypT0N0 stage cancer were not treated with adjuvant therapy according to the protocol. Patients with ypT1-2N0 or ypT3-4 or N+ were offered 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant treatment on an individual basis. An external cohort was used as a reference for the findings. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy six patients were treated with induction chemoradiotherapy and 170 underwent total mesorectal excision. Cancer staging of ypT0N0 was achieved in 26/170 (15.3%) patients. After a median follow-up of 58.3 mo, patients with ypT0N0 had five-year disease-free and overall survival rates of 96% (95%CI: 77-99) and 100%, respectively. We provide evidence about the natural history of patients with localized rectal cancer achieving a complete response after preoperative chemoradiation. The inherent good prognosis of these patients will have implications for clinical trial design and care of patients. CONCLUSION: Withholding adjuvant chemotherapy after complete response following standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and laparoscopic mesorectal excision might be safe within an experienced multidisciplinary team

GLP-1 and glucose tolerance after sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Although GLP-1 has been suggested as a major factor for the marked improvement of glucose tolerance commonly seen after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), several observations challenge this hypothesis. To better understand the role of GLP-1 in the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) long term after SG in humans, we conducted two separate cross-sectional studies: 1) the GLP-1 response to a standardized mixed liquid meal (SMLM) was compared in subjects with T2DM antedating SG but with different long-term (>2 years) T2DM outcomes (remission, relapse, or lack of remission) (study 1) and 2) the effect of GLP-1 receptor blockade with exendin (9-39) on glucose tolerance was examined in subjects with T2DM antedating surgery, who had undergone SG and presented with long-term T2DM remission (study 2). In study 1, we observed a comparable GLP-1 response to the SMLM regardless of the post-SG outcome of T2DM. In study 2, the blockade of GLP-1 action resulted in impaired insulin secretion but limited deterioration of glucose tolerance. Thus, our data suggest the enhanced GLP-1 secretion observed long term after SG is neither sufficient nor critical to maintain normal glucose tolerance in subjects with T2DM antedating the surgery

Transanal total mesorectal excision versus anterior total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity-score matched, population-based study in Catalonia, Spain

Background: the clinical value of transanal total mesorectal excision is debated. Objective: to compare short- and medium-term effects of transanal versus anterior total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Design: this was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Setting: the study included all Catalonian public hospitals. Patients: all non-metastatic patients receiving transanal or anterior total mesorectal excision (open or laparoscopic) for primary rectal cancer in 2015-16. Main outcome measures: data on vital status were collected to March 2019. Between-group differences were minimized by applying propensity score matching to baseline patient characteristics. Competing risk models were used to assess systemic and local recurrence along with death at two years, and multivariable Cox regression to assess two-year disease-free survival. Results are expressed with their 95% confidence intervals. Results: the final subsample was 537 patients receiving total mesorectal excision (transanal approach: n=145; anterior approach: n=392). Median follow-up was 39.2 months (interquartile range 33.0-45.8). Accounting for death as a competing event, there was no association between transanal total mesorectal excision and local recurrence (matched sub-hazard ratio 1.28, 0.55-2.96). There were no statistical differences in the comparative rate of local recurrence (transanal: 1.77 per 100 person-years, 0.76-3.34; anterior: 1.37 per 100 person-year, 0.8-2.15) or mortality (transanal: 3.98 per 100 person-year, 2.36-6.16; anterior: 2.99 per 100 person-years, 2.1-4.07). Groups presented similar two-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (4.83% versus 3.57%, respectively) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.33, 0.92-1.92). Limitations: we used data only from the public system, the study is retrospective, and data on individual surgeons are not reported. Conclusion: these population-based results support the use of either the transanal, open, or laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer in Catalonia. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B744

A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.

Background Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is widely used. However, robust evidence to conclude that laparoscopic surgery and open surgery have similar outcomes in rectal cancer is lacking. A trial was designed to compare 3-year rates of cancer recurrence in the pelvic or perineal area (locoregional recurrence) and survival after laparoscopic and open resection of rectal cancer. Methods In this international trial conducted in 30 hospitals, we randomly assigned patients with a solitary adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 15 cm of the anal verge, not invading adjacent tissues, and without distant metastases to undergo either laparoscopic or open surgery in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point was locoregional recurrence 3 years after the index surgery. Secondary end points included disease-free and overall survival. Results A total of 1044 patients were included (699 in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 345 in the open-surgery group). At 3 years, the locoregional recurrence rate was 5.0% in the two groups (difference, 0 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI], −2.6 to 2.6). Disease-free survival rates were 74.8% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 70.8% in the open-surgery group (difference, 4.0 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.9 to 9.9). Overall survival rates were 86.7% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 83.6% in the open-surgery group (difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.6 to 7.8). Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer was associated with rates of locoregional recurrence and disease-free and overall survival similar to those for open surgery. (Funded by Ethicon Endo-Surgery Europe and others; COLOR II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297791.