Meaning making for survivors of suicide : an exploratory study of a complicated process

This study examined the ways that survivors of suicide make meaning following the death of a person they defined as a family member, intimate partner, or shared a close friendship with. Meaning making was conceptualized through the lens of postmodernism that assumed that meaning was not a fixed entity but an on-going process of evaluation and reinterpretation. Two frames of meaning were used to examine the process; the global understandings people use to organize and make sense of the world and the appraised meaning that people create around specific events. The appraised meanings are informed and shaped by the global meaning. Meaning making was investigated through interviews with twelve survivors of suicide. The participants were asked questions which were meant to elucidate possible sites of meaning making. The findings of the study showed that people\u27s global and appraised meaning systems were greatly challenged by the loss; the suicide taught them to relearn their worlds. Participants created meaning in a variety of ways, but most were unable to validate the meanings they found. The prevalent ways of meaning making were the creation of a loss narrative, an on going connection to the deceased, and a reframing of the participants meaning structures

Treatment intensity and characteristics of MRSA infection in CF

Background: Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and interchange of hospital-associated strains carrying the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec-II (SCCmec-II) with those in the community (SCCmec-IV) has increased. This study assesses the impact of MRSA and different MRSA types on clinical outcomes, medication use, and antibiotic sensitivities. Methods: MRSA isolates from CF patients at our center were typed by SCCmec- and pvl status. Patient characteristics, lung function and nutrition are compared between MRSA types and to age, gender and Pseudomonas aeruginosa matched patients with chronic methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) infection. Results: Seventy-two percent of patients carry pvl negative SCCmec-II isolates. Seventeen percent of all MRSA were SCCmec-IV pvl positive (USA300). These patients were younger and fewer had chronic P. aeruginosa infection, whereas pvl-negative SCCmec-IV isolates show highest antibiotic resistance. Nutritional outcomes and FEV1 percent predicted (75.1±2.7 versus 77.9±2.7) did not differ in patients with MRSA compared to those with MSSA but MRSA patients received more pulmonary maintenance but not oral antibiotic medications. Conclusion: Patients with chronic MRSA are treated more intensely than age, gender and Pseudomonas aeruginosa matched MSSA-positive patients but clinical characteristics within MRSA patients vary depending on MRSA types

Cancer Incidence Among Those Initiating Insulin Therapy With Glargine Versus Human NPH Insulin

OBJECTIVE To add to the evidence on comparative long-term effects of insulin analog glargine versus human NPH insulin on the risk for cancer. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We identified cohorts of initiators of glargine and human NPH without an insulin prescription during the prior 19 months among patients covered by the Inovalon Medical Outcomes Research for Effectiveness and Economics Registry (MORE2 Registry) between January 2003 and December 2010. Patients were required to have a second prescription of the same insulin within 180 days and to be free of cancer. We balanced cohorts on risk factors for cancer outcomes based on comorbidities, comedication, and health care use during the prior 12 months using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Incident cancer was defined as having two claims for cancer (any cancer) or the same cancer (breast, prostate, colon) within 2 months. We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% CI using weighted Cox models censoring for stopping, switching, or augmenting insulin treatment, end of enrollment, and mortality. RESULTS More patients initiated glargine (43,306) than NPH (9,147). Initiators of glargine (NPH) were followed for 1.2 (1.1) years and 50,548 (10,011) person-years; 993 (178) developed cancer. The overall HR was 1.12 (95% CI 0.95–1.32). Results were consistent for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and colon cancer; various durations of treatment; and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Patients initiating insulin glargine rather than NPH do not seem to be at an increased risk for cancer. While our study contributes significantly to our evidence base for long-term effects, this evidence is very limited mainly based on actual dynamics in insulin prescribing

Medical Records-Based Postmarketing Safety Evaluation of Rare Events with Uncertain Status

We develop a simple statistic for comparing rates of rare adverse events between treatment groups in post-marketing safety studies where the events have uncertain status. In this setting, the statistic is asymptotically equivalent to the logrank statistic, but the limiting distribution has Poisson and binomial components instead of being Guassian. We develop two new procedures for computing critical values, a Gaussian approximation and a parametric bootstrap. Both numerical and asymptotic properties of the procedures are studied. The test procedures are demonstrated on a post-marketing safety study of the RotaTeq vaccine. This vaccine was developed to reduce the incidence of severe diarrhea in infants

Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006

OBJECTIVE We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In 2003–2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged ≥12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples. RESULTS Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged ≥20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C ≥6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988–1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria. CONCLUSIONS Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected. The A1C test has recently been recommended for diagnosing diabetes, based on a detailed analysis of its attributes by an international expert committee (1). Laboratory-measured A1C is now as accurate and precise as glucose assays due to improvements in instrumentation and standardization. A1C samples can be obtained at any time, require no patient preparation, and are relatively stable at room temperature after collection. A1C has substantially less biologic variability and is unaffected by acute effects of stress or illness. As a measure of long-term glycemic exposure, A1C has been shown to be better and more consistently correlated with retinopathy in the setting of observational studies and clinical trials in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, which have established widely accepted A1C treatment goals for diabetes. A cut point of ≥6.5% for the diagnosis of diabetes was recommended by the committee as optimal for detecting a level of retinopathy thought to be diabetes specific and not due to other conditions (e.g., hypertension). A limitation of A1C for diagnosis is that the committee could not define a specific intermediate threshold at which increased risk for diabetes clearly begins. While there is a continuum of risk even at values into the normal range, the committee suggested the range of ≥6.0 to <6.5% to represent the highest risk for progression to diabetes and one at which preventive measures might be implemented, with additional consideration of prevention efforts at lower levels in the presence of other risk factors. The committee hoped that its report would serve as a stimulus to the scientific community and professional organizations for considering the A1C assay for diagnosis of diabetes. A change in diagnostic criteria has important public health implications pertaining to the magnitude of the population with diabetes or at high risk of diabetes. This report examines the prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes based on self-report and A1C criteria in the U.S. population during 2003–2006. Prevalences are compared with those using the A1C criteria in 1988–1994 and 1999–2002. Finally, we compare the concordance in prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes using the new A1C criteria to criteria based on fasting plasma glucose and 2-h plasma glucose from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

Metformin for Weight Loss and Metabolic Control in Overweight Outpatients With Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder

The purpose of this study was to determine whether metformin promotes weight loss in overweight out-patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

Full Accounting of Diabetes and Pre-Diabetes in the U.S. Population in 1988–1994 and 2005–2006

OBJECTIVE—We examined the prevalences of diagnosed diabetes, and undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes using fasting and 2-h oral glucose tolerance test values, in the U.S. during 2005–2006. We then compared the prevalences of these conditions with those in 1988–1994

A Randomized Trial Examining the Effectiveness of Switching From Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Risperidone to Aripiprazole to Reduce Metabolic Risk: Comparison of Antipsychotics for Metabolic Problems (CAMP)

We conducted a multi-site, randomized controlled trial examining the strategy of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole to ameliorate metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease