Processo cautelar

Divulgação dos SUMÁRIOS das obras recentemente incorporadas ao acervo da Biblioteca Ministro Oscar Saraiva do STJ. Em respeito à Lei de Direitos Autorais, não disponibilizamos a obra na íntegra. STJ00089564 347.919.6(81) A474

Negociação, mediação, conciliação e arbitragem: curso de métodos adequados de solução de controvérsias

- Divulgação dos SUMÁRIOS das obras recentemente incorporadas ao acervo da Biblioteca Ministro Oscar Saraiva do STJ. Em respeito à Lei de Direitos Autorais, não disponibilizamos a obra na íntegra.- Localização na estante: 347.918(81) N384m- Coordenado por: Carlos Alberto de Salles, Marco Antônio Garcia Lopes Lorencini e Paulo Eduardo Alves da Silva

A experiência do Núcleo de Estudos de Meios de Solução de Conflitos (NEMESC) = The experience of University of São Paulo´s Dispute Resolution Study Group (NEMESC)

O artigo apresenta a experiência desenvolvida pelo Núcleo de Estudos de Meios de Solução de Conflitos (NEMESC) no âmbito da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo. As atividades desenvolvidas, que completaram cinco anos em 2009, tiveram início informalmente através de grupo de estudo com alunos da graduação e pós-graduação e hoje se firmaram como disciplinas de extensão da Faculdade de Direito. Este artigo considera as atividades e práticas desenvolvidas pelo grupo, as escolhas metodológicas e o envolvimento dos alunos durante estes cinco anos de experiência do NEMESC, para demonstrar os resultados auferidos. o objetivo é contribuir para o debate sobre o tema e uma troca de experiências sobre meios de solução de conflitos no âmbito da faculdade de direito.<br>This paper presents the 5 years' experience of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Group (NEMESC) established at the University of Sao Paulo Law School. The NEMESC begun as a studying and reading group interested to debate and to research about alternative dispute resolution issues, and now a course emerged from this studying group at the law school. This paper considers the activities and practices developed by the group, the methodological choices and students' involvement during the 5 years of the NEMESC experience to show some positive results. The paper goal is contributing to the debates about alternative dispute resolution and to the exchange of views and experiences about adr at the law school environment

A experiência do núcleo de estudos de meios de solução de conflictos (NEMESC)

This paper presents the 5 years' experience of the alternative dispute resolution group (NEMESC) established at the University of Sao Paulo Law School. The nemesc begun as a studying and reading group interested to debate and to research about alternative dispute resolution issues, and now a course emerged from this studying group at the law school. This paper considers the activities and practices developed by the group, the methodological choices and students' involvement during the 5 years of the nemesc experience to show some positive results. The paper goal is contributing to the debates about alternative dispute resolution and to the exchange of views and experiences about adr at the law school environment.Fil: Salles, Carlos Alberto de. Universidad de San Pablo. Facultad de Derecho. Cátedra Derecho Procesal. San Pablo, BrasilFil: Gabbay, Daniela M. Universidad de San Pablo. Facultad de Derecho. San Pablo, BrasilFil: Silva, Erica B. Universidad de San Pablo. Facultad de Derecho. San Pablo, BrasilFil: Tartuce, Fernanda. Universidad de San Pablo. Facultad de Derecho. San Pablo, BrasilFil: Guerrero, Luis Fernando. Universidad de San Pablo. Facultad de Derecho. San Pablo, BrasilFil: Garcia Lopes Lorencini, Marco Antônio. Universidad de San Pablo. Facultad de Derecho. Cátedra Derecho Civil. San Pablo, BrasilFil: Garcia Lopes Lorencini, Marco Antônio. Universidad de San Pablo. Facultad de Derecho. Cátedra Derecho Procesal Civil. San Pablo, BrasilFe de erratas publicada en Academia, año 10, nro. 20, 2012. -- "Por razones relacionadas con los plazos de las publicaciones ajenas a los editores, en Academia. Revista sobre enseñanza del Derecho, año 9, nro. 18, 2011, pp. 33-57, fue publicado el trabajo de Carlos Alberto de Salles, Daniela M. Gabbay, Erica B. Silva, Fernanda Tartuce, Luis Fernando Guerrero y Marco Antônio G. L. Lorencini, "A experiência do núcleo de estudos de meios de solução de conflitos (NEMESC)" sin referencia a su publicación en: Salles, Carlos Alberto de et al., "A experiencia do núcleo de estudos de meios de solução de conflitos (NEMESC)", en Rev. Direito GV, junio de 2010, vol. 6, nro. 1, pp. 67-94, ISSN 1808-2432, que puede ser consultada en https://www.scielo.br/cgi-bin/wxis.exe/iah/ ". -- El artículo presenta la experiencia desarrollada por el núcleo de estudios de medios de solución de conflictos (NEMESC) en el ámbito de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de San Pablo. Las actividades, que cumplieron cinco años en 2009, tuvieron inicio informalmente a través de un grupo de estudio con alumnos de grado y posgrado y hoy se consagraron como disciplinas de extensión de la Facultad de Derecho. Este artículo considera las actividades y prácticas desarrolladas por el grupo, las elecciones metodológicas y el compromiso de los alumnos durante estos cinco años de experiencia del NEMESC, a fin de contribuir en el debate sobre el tema y sobre el cambio de experiencias en medios de solución de conflictos en el ámbito de la Facultad de Derecho.\

Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network

International audienceThe shortage of reliable primary taxonomic data limits the description of biological taxa and the understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes, complicating biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary studies. This deficit creates a significant taxonomic impediment to biodiversity research and conservation planning. The taxonomic impediment and the biodiversity crisis are widely recognized, highlighting the urgent need for reliable taxonomic data. Over the past decade, numerous countries worldwide have devoted considerable effort to Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), which called for the preparation of a working list of all known plant species by 2010 and an online world Flora by 2020. Brazil is a megadiverse country, home to more of the world's known plant species than any other country. Despite that, Flora Brasiliensis, concluded in 1906, was the last comprehensive treatment of the Brazilian flora. The lack of accurate estimates of the number of species of algae, fungi, and plants occurring in Brazil contributes to the prevailing taxonomic impediment and delays progress towards the GSPC targets. Over the past 12 years, a legion of taxonomists motivated to meet Target 1 of the GSPC, worked together to gather and integrate knowledge on the algal, plant, and fungal diversity of Brazil. Overall, a team of about 980 taxonomists joined efforts in a highly collaborative project that used cybertaxonomy to prepare an updated Flora of Brazil, showing the power of scientific collaboration to reach ambitious goals. This paper presents an overview of the Brazilian Flora 2020 and provides taxonomic and spatial updates on the algae, fungi, and plants found in one of the world's most biodiverse countries. We further identify collection gaps and summarize future goals that extend beyond 2020. Our results show that Brazil is home to 46,975 native species of algae, fungi, and plants, of which 19,669 are endemic to the country. The data compiled to date suggests that the Atlantic Rainforest might be the most diverse Brazilian domain for all plant groups except gymnosperms, which are most diverse in the Amazon. However, scientific knowledge of Brazilian diversity is still unequally distributed, with the Atlantic Rainforest and the Cerrado being the most intensively sampled and studied biomes in the country. In times of “scientific reductionism”, with botanical and mycological sciences suffering pervasive depreciation in recent decades, the first online Flora of Brazil 2020 significantly enhanced the quality and quantity of taxonomic data available for algae, fungi, and plants from Brazil. This project also made all the information freely available online, providing a firm foundation for future research and for the management, conservation, and sustainable use of the Brazilian funga and flora

Growing knowledge: an overview of Seed Plant diversity in Brazil

Abstract An updated inventory of Brazilian seed plants is presented and offers important insights into the country's biodiversity. This work started in 2010, with the publication of the Plants and Fungi Catalogue, and has been updated since by more than 430 specialists working online. Brazil is home to 32,086 native Angiosperms and 23 native Gymnosperms, showing an increase of 3% in its species richness in relation to 2010. The Amazon Rainforest is the richest Brazilian biome for Gymnosperms, while the Atlantic Rainforest is the richest one for Angiosperms. There was a considerable increment in the number of species and endemism rates for biomes, except for the Amazon that showed a decrease of 2.5% of recorded endemics. However, well over half of Brazillian seed plant species (57.4%) is endemic to this territory. The proportion of life-forms varies among different biomes: trees are more expressive in the Amazon and Atlantic Rainforest biomes while herbs predominate in the Pampa, and lianas are more expressive in the Amazon, Atlantic Rainforest, and Pantanal. This compilation serves not only to quantify Brazilian biodiversity, but also to highlight areas where there information is lacking and to provide a framework for the challenge faced in conserving Brazil's unique and diverse flora