8 research outputs found

    Consistent improvement with eculizumab across muscle groups in myasthenia gravis

    Full text link
    Objective: To assess whether eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, improves patient- and physician-reported outcomes (evaluated using the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile and the quantitative myasthenia gravis scale, respectively) in patients with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis across four domains, representing ocular, bulbar, respiratory, and limb/gross motor muscle groups. Methods: Patients with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis were randomized 1:1 to receive either placebo or eculizumab during the REGAIN study (NCT01997229). Patients who completed REGAIN were eligible to continue into the open-label extension trial (NCT02301624) for up to 4 years. The four domain scores of each of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile and the quantitative myasthenia gravis scale recorded throughout REGAIN and through 130 weeks of the open-label extension were analyzed. Results: Of the 125 patients who participated in REGAIN, 117 enrolled in the open-label extension; 61 had received placebo and 56 had received eculizumab during REGAIN. Patients experienced rapid improvements in total scores and all four domain scores of both the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile and the quantitative myasthenia gravis scale with eculizumab treatment. These improvements were sustained through 130 weeks of the open-label extension. Interpretation: Eculizumab treatment elicits rapid and sustained improvements in muscle strength across ocular, bulbar, respiratory, and limb/gross motor muscle groups and in associated daily activities in patients with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis

    Long-term efficacy of eculizumab in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis: responder analyses.

    No full text
    ObjectiveGeneralized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is an autoimmune disease that causes disabling weakness via damage to the neuromuscular junction. In most patients, the disease is mediated by autoantibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, which activate the complement cascade. Our objective was to analyze response profiles in adult patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory gMG treated with eculizumab-a terminal complement inhibitor-in the REGAIN study or its open-label extension (OLE).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores recorded during REGAIN and its OLE. Early/late responses were defined as improvement in MG-ADL score (≄3 points) or QMG score (≄5 points) at ≀12 or >12 weeks, respectively, after eculizumab initiation.ResultsThe analysis included 98 patients. By Week 12 and conclusion of the OLE, MG-ADL response had been achieved at some point by 67.3% and 84.7% of patients, respectively, and QMG response by 56.1% and 71.4%, respectively. Response was observed over multiple consecutive assessments for most patients. At Week 130, the least-squares mean percentage changes (95% CI) from baseline in MG-ADL score were -61.9% (-69.9%, -53.9%) and -47.5% (-59.0%, -36.0%) in early and late MG-ADL responders, respectively; the least-squares mean percentage changes from baseline in QMG score were -40.8% (-48.3%, -33.4%) and -55.5% (-68.4%, -42.7%) in early and late QMG responders, respectively.InterpretationThe findings suggest that, although most patients with refractory gMG will achieve clinical response by Week 12 of eculizumab treatment, first responses can be observed with longer-term treatment

    Long‐term efficacy of eculizumab in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis: responder analyses

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is an autoimmune disease that causes disabling weakness via damage to the neuromuscular junction. In most patients, the disease is mediated by autoantibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, which activate the complement cascade. Our objective was to analyze response profiles in adult patients with anti‐acetylcholine receptor antibody‐positive refractory gMG treated with eculizumab—a terminal complement inhibitor—in the REGAIN study or its open‐label extension (OLE). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed Myasthenia Gravis‐Activities of Daily Living (MG‐ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores recorded during REGAIN and its OLE. Early/late responses were defined as improvement in MG‐ADL score (≄3 points) or QMG score (≄5 points) at ≀12 or >12 weeks, respectively, after eculizumab initiation. RESULTS: The analysis included 98 patients. By Week 12 and conclusion of the OLE, MG‐ADL response had been achieved at some point by 67.3% and 84.7% of patients, respectively, and QMG response by 56.1% and 71.4%, respectively. Response was observed over multiple consecutive assessments for most patients. At Week 130, the least‐squares mean percentage changes (95% CI) from baseline in MG‐ADL score were −61.9% (−69.9%, −53.9%) and −47.5% (−59.0%, −36.0%) in early and late MG‐ADL responders, respectively; the least‐squares mean percentage changes from baseline in QMG score were −40.8% (−48.3%, −33.4%) and −55.5% (−68.4%, −42.7%) in early and late QMG responders, respectively. INTERPRETATION: The findings suggest that, although most patients with refractory gMG will achieve clinical response by Week 12 of eculizumab treatment, first responses can be observed with longer‐term treatment

    Rethinking communication in risk interpretation and action

    Get PDF
    Communication is fundamental to the transfer of information between individuals, agencies and organizations, and therefore, it is crucial to planning and decision-making particularly in cases of uncertainty and risk. This paper brings forth some critical aspects of communication that need to be acknowledged and considered while managing risks. Most of the previous studies and theories on natural hazards and disaster management have limited perspective on communication, and hence, its implication is limited to awareness, warnings and emergency response to some selected events. This paper exposes the role of communication as a moderator of not just risk interpretation and action but also various factors responsible for shaping overall response, such as individual decision-making under uncertainty, heuristics, past experiences, learning, trust, complexity, scale and the social context. It suggests that communication is a process that influences decision-making in multiple ways, and therefore, it plays a critical role in shaping local responses to various risks. It opens up the scope for using communication beyond its current use as a tool to manage emergency situations. An in-depth understanding of ongoing communication and its implications can help to plan risk management more effectively over time rather than as a short-term response
    corecore