Neeruasendusravi epidemioloogia Eestis

Neeruasendusravi (NAR) meetodid, nagu dialüüsravi ja transplantatsioon, on arenenud aastakümneid paralleelselt. Kuigi nii dialüüsi kui neeru transplanteerimise katseid tehti 20. sajandi algusaastatel, toimus esimene edukas neeru- siirdamine Brigham & Women’s haiglas USAs 1954. aastal. 50.–60. aastatel muutus neeruasendusravi, sh transplantatsioon, majanduslikult arenenud maades rutiinseks raviks (1, 2)

Neeruasendusravi Eestis aastatel 1996–2004

Eestis jt maades on neeruasendusravi vajavate kroonilise neerupuudulikkusega haigete arv aasta- aastalt kasvanud. Peamiseks neerupuudulikkuse sagenemise põhjuseks paljudes maades on diabeetilise ja kõrgvererõhktõve tagajärjel tekkinud nefropaatia sagenemine. Probleemiks on ka neerupuudulikkuse esinemine eakatel patsientidel. Et aeglustada kroonilise neeruhaiguse progresseerumist ja edasi lükata neeruasendusravi alustamist, on oluline võimalikult varases staadiumis avastada krooniline neerupuudulikkus. Artiklis on analüüsitud neeruasendusravi vajavate haigete kliinilisi ja epidemioloogilisi andmeid Eestis aastatel 1996–2004 ning võrreldud neid teiste maade andmetega. Eesti Arst 2005; 84 (10): 714–71

Successful rescue therapy with mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation improves the long-term graft survival

Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the graft survival after kidney transplantation in patients treated with azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and analyze the significance of different risk factors for graft survival. Material and methods. A total of 137 patients, transplanted between January 1996 and June 2001, were retrospectively divided into two groups: patients who received AZA together with cyclosporine A and methylprednisolone (AZA group, n=72) and patients who received MMF either immediately or were switched from AZA to MMF during 3 months (MMF group, n=65). Results. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, a 1-year graft survival was 79% in the AZA group and 85% in the MMF group; a 6-year graft survival was 51% and 67%, respectively (P=0.046). Multivariate Cox survival model demonstrated that MMF therapy reduced the risk of graft loss by 34% (P=0.028), while delayed graft function increased the risk of graft loss (risk ratio 2.26, P=0.009). A statistically significant difference in total cholesterol level (6.7 vs. 5.7 mmol/L, respectively; P=0.002), mean systolic blood pressure (145 vs. 134 mmHg, P=0.009), and cyclosporine A daily dose (238 vs. 203 mg, P=0.015) between the AZA and MMF groups at 1 year was revealed. Conclusion. MMF rescue therapy improves the long-term graft survival compared to AZA despite high early rejection rate and avoids the negative impact of acute rejections on graft survival

Long-Term Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression in De Novo KidneyTransplant Recipients : 5-Y Prospective Follow-Up of Patients in the ADVANCE study

Background. Although prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) is widely approved for posttransplantation immunosuppres-sion in kidney recipients, large-scale studies are required to assess long-term outcomes. We present follow-up data from the ADVANCE trial, in which kidney transplant patients (KTPs) received corticosteroid minimization with PR-T. Methods. ADVANCE was a 24-wk, randomized, open-label, phase-4 study. De novo KTPs received PR-T with basiliximab and mycophe-nolate mofetil and were randomized to receive an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus plus tapered corticosteroids until day 10 (arm 1) or an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus (arm 2). In this 5-y, noninterventional follow-up, patients received maintenance immunosuppression according to standard practice. Primary endpoint included graft survival (Kaplan-Meier). Secondary end-points included patient survival, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection–free survival, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (4-vari-able modification of diet in renal disease). Results. Follow-up study included 1125 patients. Overall graft survival at 1 and 5 y posttransplant was 93.8% and 88.1%, respectively, and was similar between treatment arms. At 1 and 5 y, patient survival was 97.8% and 94.4%, respectively. Five-year graft and patient survival rates in KTPs who remained on PR-T were 91.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated similar risk of graft loss and death between treatment arms. Five-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection–free survival was 84.1%. Mean ± standard deviation values of estimated glo-merular filtration rate were 52.7 ± 19.5 and 51.1 ± 22.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 and 5 y, respectively. Fifty adverse drug reactions were recorded, probably tacrolimus-related, in 12 patients (1.5%). Conclusions. Graft survival and patient survival—over-all and for KTPs who remained on PR-T—were numerically high and similar between treatment arms at 5 y posttransplant

Incidence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with 2 different corticosteroid minimization strategies: ADVANCE, a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: ADVANCE (NCT01304836) was a phase 4, multicenter, prospectively randomized, open-label, 24-week study comparing the incidence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) with 2 prolonged-release tacrolimus corticosteroid minimization regimens. METHODS: All patients received prolonged-release tacrolimus, basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil and 1 bolus of intraoperative corticosteroids (0-1000 mg) as per center policy. Patients in arm 1 received tapered corticosteroids, stopped after day 10, whereas patients in arm 2 received no steroids after the intraoperative bolus. The primary efficacy variable was the diagnosis of PTDM as per American Diabetes Association criteria (2010) at any point up to 24 weeks postkidney transplantation. Secondary efficacy variables included incidence of composite efficacy failure (graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection or severe graft dysfunction: estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4) <30 mL/min per 1.73 m), acute rejection and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The full-analysis set included 1081 patients (arm 1: n = 528, arm 2: n = 553). Baseline characteristics and mean tacrolimus trough levels were comparable between arms. Week 24 Kaplan-Meier estimates of PTDM were similar for arm 1 versus arm 2 (17.4% vs 16.6%; P = 0.579). Incidence of composite efficacy failure, graft and patient survival, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate were also comparable between arms. Biopsy-proven acute rejection and acute rejection were significantly higher in arm 2 versus arm 1 (13.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.006 and 25.9% vs 18.2%, P = 0.001, respectively). Tolerability profiles were comparable between arms. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged-release tacrolimus, basiliximab, and mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppressive regimen is efficacious, with a low incidence of PTDM and a manageable tolerability profile over 24 weeks of treatment. A lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was seen in patients receiving corticosteroids tapered over 10 days plus an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus versus those receiving an intraoperative bolus only.status: publishe

Incidence of Posttransplantation Diabetes Mellitus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression With 2 Different Corticosteroid Minimization Strategies: ADVANCE, A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: ADVANCE (NCT01304836) was a phase 4, multicenter, prospectively randomized, open-label, 24-week study comparing the incidence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) with 2 prolonged-release tacrolimus corticosteroid minimization regimens. METHODS: All patients received prolonged-release tacrolimus, basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil and 1 bolus of intraoperative corticosteroids (0-1000 mg) as per center policy. Patients in arm 1 received tapered corticosteroids, stopped after day 10, whereas patients in arm 2 received no steroids after the intraoperative bolus. The primary efficacy variable was the diagnosis of PTDM as per American Diabetes Association criteria (2010) at any point up to 24 weeks postkidney transplantation. Secondary efficacy variables included incidence of composite efficacy failure (graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection or severe graft dysfunction: estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4) <30 mL/min per 1.73 m), acute rejection and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The full-analysis set included 1081 patients (arm 1: n = 528, arm 2: n = 553). Baseline characteristics and mean tacrolimus trough levels were comparable between arms. Week 24 Kaplan-Meier estimates of PTDM were similar for arm 1 versus arm 2 (17.4% vs 16.6%; P = 0.579). Incidence of composite efficacy failure, graft and patient survival, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate were also comparable between arms. Biopsy-proven acute rejection and acute rejection were significantly higher in arm 2 versus arm 1 (13.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.006 and 25.9% vs 18.2%, P = 0.001, respectively). Tolerability profiles were comparable between arms. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged-release tacrolimus, basiliximab, and mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppressive regimen is efficacious, with a low incidence of PTDM and a manageable tolerability profile over 24 weeks of treatment. A lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was seen in patients receiving corticosteroids tapered over 10 days plus an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus versus those receiving an intraoperative bolus only