55 research outputs found

    Pneumatosis Intestinalis with Pneumoperitoneum Mimicking Intestinal Perforation in a Patient with Myelodysplastic Syndrome after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

    Get PDF
    Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is an uncommon disorder characterized by an accumulation of gas in the bowel wall, and has been associated with a variety of disorders and procedures. We describe a 35-year-old man who undertook hematopoietic stem cell transplantation due to myelodysplastic syndrome. An abdominal X-ray demonstrated extensive PI with pneumoperitoneum mimicking hollow organ perforation. However, the patient had no abdominal symptoms and there was no evidence of peritoneal inflammation. After two weeks of conservative management, including bowel rest and antibiotics, his pneumoperitoneum resolved spontaneously without any complications. Of the many factors that affect the gastrointestinal tract mucosal integrity, intramural pressure, and bacterial flora-produced intraluminal gas interact to produce PI. If the condition is accompanied by bowel ischemia, portomesenteric venous gas, metabolic acidosis, and abdominal sepsis, or if PI is severe in extent immediate surgical intervention is indicated. The described case supports that a mechanical rather than a bacterial etiology underlies the pathogenesis of PI

    Remdesivir Versus Standard-of-Care for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An Analysis of 28-Day Mortality

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is FDA approved for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and has been shown to shorten time to recovery and improve clinical outcomes in randomized trials. METHODS: This was the final day 28 comparative analysis of data from a phase 3, randomized, open-label study comparing 2 remdesivir regimens (5 vs 10 days, combined for this analysis [remdesivir cohort]) and a real-world retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (non-remdesivir cohort). Eligible patients, aged ≥18 years, had confirmed SARSCoV-2, oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, with pulmonary infiltrates. Propensity score matching (up to 1:10 ratio) was used to ensure comparable populations. We assessed day 14 clinical recovery (determined using a 7-point ordinal scale) and day 28 all-cause mortality (coprimary endpoints). RESULTS: Altogether, 368 (remdesivir) and 1399 (non-remdesivir) patients were included in the matched analysis. The day 14 clinical recovery rate was significantly higher among the remdesivir versus the non-remdesivir cohort (65.2% vs 57.1%; OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.16–1.90; P = .002). The day 28 mortality rate was significantly lower in the remdesivir cohort versus the non-remdesivir cohort (12.0% vs 16.2%; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47–0.95; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir was associated with significantly higher rates of day 14 clinical recovery, and lower day 28 mortality, compared with standard-of-care treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Collectively, these data support the use of remdesivir to improve clinical recovery and decrease mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection

    Itchin' for a diversion

    No full text
    corecore