13 research outputs found

    Proto-Indo-European *sneigʷʰ- ‘to fall down; to snow’

    Get PDF
    Descriptive and Comparative Linguistic

    Linguistic supplement to Damgaard et al. 2018: Early Indo-European languages, Anatolian, Tocharian and Indo-Iranian

    Get PDF
    We recount the evidence for the so-called “Steppe Hypothesis” discussed in Damgaard et al. 2018 and offer a revised linguistic and historical model for the prehistoric dispersal of three important Indo-European language subgroups—the Anatolian Indo-European languages into Anatolia, the Tocharian languages into Inner Asia, and the Indo-Iranian languages into South Asia—based on the newly analysed archaeogenetic data.Descriptive and Comparative Linguistic

    European prehistory between Celtic and Germanic: the Celto-Germanic isoglosses revisited

    Get PDF
    Horizon 2020(H2020)716732Descriptive and Comparative Linguistic

    Mogelijkheden voor verhoging van de stikstofefficiëntie : deskstudie in het kader van het project Nutriënten Waterproof, LNV-programma's systeeminnovatie open teelten (400-I en 400-III)

    Get PDF
    Het doel van deze deskstudie is in kaart brengen van de mogelijkheden van geleide bemestingsstrategieën. Deze strategieën moeten leiden tot minimale emissies van nutriënten. De strategieën dienen vervolgens te worden uitgewerkt voor de diverse systemen die in Nutriënten Waterproof worden aangelegd. Verder is het doel van deze deskstudie te bekijken hoe de ruimtelijke variabiliteit van de diverse percelen in kaart gebracht kan worden en hoe met deze variabiliteit omgegaan dient te worden in de bemestingsstrategieën. Deze deskstudie richt zich op stikstof

    Vergelijking enkele sorghumrassen met snijmaïs op lössgrond : resultaten van éénjarige veldproef 2018

    No full text
    Regional water Authority “Limburg”, foundations “Boerenbond Zuid” and “Boerenbond Swentibold”, Pilot smart fertilization, DSG-Sustainable Clean Groundwater (WML), Foundation Experimental farm “Wijnandsrade” and DSV seeds the Netherlands financed comparative research of five sorghum varieties and one maize variety on loess soil at experimental farm “Wijnandsrade” in Wijnandsrade (Province Limburg). The average yield of the six varieties for the two N-levels - 70 and 110 kg N/ha - was about 16 tonnes DM/ha. Despite the dry and warm growing season, maize produced at 70 and 110 kg N/ha, 16 and 20 tons DM/ha, with a digestibility coefficient of organic matter (DCOM) of 78% and 79%, crude protein content of 58 and 59 g/kg DM and starch content of 267 and 230 g/kg DM, respectively. When fertilizing 70 kg N/ha compared to 110 kg N/ha, the average yield of all sorghum varieties was higher (15 vs 13 tonnes DM/ha), the crude protein level equal (91 g/kg DM), the starch content higher (238 vs 173 g/kg DM), the DCOM almost equal (67 vs 66%), the crude fibre level lower (206 vs 232 g/kg DM) and the lignin (ADL) level lower (25 vs 27). At 70 kg N/ha, the five sorghum varieties had an average of 37% less residual-N/ha than maize. At 110 kg N/ha, the opposite appeared: the five sorghum varieties had on average 33% more residual-N/ha than maize
    corecore