The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU - Workshop proceedings

Although the need for non-animal alternatives has been well recognised for the human health hazard assessment of chemicals in general, it has become especially pressing for cosmetic ingredients due to the full implementation of testing and marketing bans on animal testing under the European Cosmetics Regulation. This means that for the safety assessment of cosmetics, the necessary safety data for both the ingredients and the finished product can be drawn from validated (or scientifically-valid), so-called "Replacement methods". In view of the challenges for safety assessment without recourse to animal test data, the Methodology Working Group of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety organised a workshop in February 2019 to discuss the key issues in regard to the use of animal-free alternative methods for the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. This perspective article summarises the outcomes of this workshop and reflects on the state-of-the-art and possible way forward for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients for which no experimental animal data exist. The use and optimisation of "New Approach Methodology" that could be useful tools in the context of the "Next Generation Risk Assessment" and the strategic framework for safety assessment of cosmetics were discussed in depth.</p

Treating Cancer by Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Abrogation Discovery of Two Clinical Candidates, BAY 1161909 and BAY 1217389, Targeting MPS1 Kinase

Inhibition of monopolar spindle 1 MPS1 kinase represents a novel approach to cancer treatment instead of arresting the cell cycle in tumor cells, cells are driven into mitosis irrespective of DNA damage and unattached misattached chromosomes, resulting in aneuploidy and cell death. Starting points for our optimization efforts with the goal to identify MPS1 inhibitors were two HTS hits from the distinct chemical series triazolopyridines and imidazopyrazines . The major initial issue of the triazolopyridine series was the moderate potency of the HTS hits. The imidazopyrazine series displayed more than 10 fold higher potencies; however, in the early project phase, this series suffered from poor metabolic stability. Here, we outline the evolution of the two hit series to clinical candidates BAY 1161909 and BAY 1217389 and reveal how both clinical candidates bind to the ATP site of MPS1 kinase, while addressing different pockets utilizing different binding interactions, along with their synthesis and preclinical characterization in selected in vivo efficacy model

The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU - Workshop proceedings

Although the need for non-animal alternatives has been well recognised for the human health hazard assessment of chemicals in general, it has become especially pressing for cosmetic ingredients due to the full implementation of testing and marketing bans on animal testing under the European Cosmetics Regulation. This means that for the safety assessment of cosmetics, the necessary safety data for both the ingredients and the finished product can be drawn from validated (or scientifically-valid), so-called "Replacement methods". In view of the challenges for safety assessment without recourse to animal test data, the Methodology Working Group of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety organised a workshop in February 2019 to discuss the key issues in regard to the use of animal-free alternative methods for the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. This perspective article summarises the outcomes of this workshop and reflects on the state-of-the-art and possible way forward for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients for which no experimental animal data exist. The use and optimisation of "New Approach Methodology" that could be useful tools in the context of the "Next Generation Risk Assessment" and the strategic framework for safety assessment of cosmetics were discussed in depth