Perfluoroether triazine elastomers

The synthesis of high performance elastomers with the high thermal stability and chemical, inertness of perfluoroalkylene triazine and a low glass transition temperature is discussed. Perfluorether triazine elastomers were proposed as potentially superior. It is concluded that the difficulties experienced in fluoroalkytriazine elastomer synthesis can be overcome by a four-step reaction process involving chain extension, triazine ring closure, crosslinking, and elastomer curing. Molecular weight can be controlled in the initial polymer formation so that elastomer modulus can be determined. The final product elastomers exhibit a useful elastomeric range of approximately 45 to 325 C with an oxidative stability superior to other broad range elastomers

Process for the preparation of fluorine containing crosslinked elastomeric polytriazine and product so produced

Crosslinking elastomeric polytriazines are prepared by a 4 step procedure which consists of (1) forming a poly(imidoylamidine) by the reaction, under reflux conditions, of anhydrous ammonia with certain perfluorinated alkyl or alkylether dinitriles; (2) forming a linear polytriazine by cyclizing the imidoylamidine linkages by reaction with certain perfluorinated alkyl or alkylether acid anhydrides or halides; (3) extending the linear polytriazine chain by further refluxing in anhydrous ammonia; and (4) heating to cyclize the new imidoylamidine and thereby crosslink the polymer

Perfluroether triazine elastomers

In order to obtain high performance elastomers with the high thermal stability and chemical inertness of perfluoroalkylene triazine and a low glass transition temperature, perfluoroether triazine elastomers were synthesized. The procedure for elastomer synthesis is described as well as general experimental methods. Results are presented and discussed. The screening of catalysts for the dehydration of perfluoroether diamide is also considered

Post-Mississippian tectonic evolution of the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and Midcontinent Rift System, SE Nebraska and N Kansas

The geologic structures of the central Midcontinent of the USA are largely buried and known only from geophysical datasets, coupled with sparse well control and limited outcrop. Such unconstrained geophysical models preclude a deeper assessment of possible continental interior seismic hazards, which have the potential to cause appreciable damage. Within the study area in southeastern Nebraska and northeastern Kansas is an area of elevated seismic risk, with a spatial relationship to the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and the Midcontinent Rift System. Using sequential restorations of three published cross sections within Nebraska and Kansas this study demonstrates that the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and Midcontinent Rift System have each been reactivated several times since the end of the Mississippian (the details of deformation prior to the Mississippian are not considered). Our reconstructions indicate that in addition to major Pennsylvanian-Early Permian fault reactivation during the Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogeny there was also deformation both prior to the post-Mississippian unconformity associated with uplift on the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and after the deposition of late Early-early Late Cretaceous sediments in the study area, potentially due to the Laramide orogeny. Results also indicate that the magnitude of the far-field stresses is sufficient to cause seismogenic reactivation on favorably oriented pre-existing faults. This history of reactivation of geologic structures in the central Midcontinent suggests that seismic hazards in the region in the present cannot be ruled out. Though dangerous large earthquakes are uncommon in the continental interior, seismic activity along the structures in the study area would threaten several large population centers and the potential for this activity should not be ignored

Post-Mississippian tectonic evolution of the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and Midcontinent Rift System, SE Nebraska and N Kansas

The geologic structures of the central Midcontinent of the USA are largely buried and known only from geophysical datasets, coupled with sparse well control and limited outcrop. Such unconstrained geophysical models preclude a deeper assessment of possible continental interior seismic hazards, which have the potential to cause appreciable damage. Within the study area in southeastern Nebraska and northeastern Kansas is an area of elevated seismic risk, with a spatial relationship to the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and the Midcontinent Rift System. Using sequential restorations of three published cross sections within Nebraska and Kansas this study demonstrates that the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and Midcontinent Rift System have each been reactivated several times since the end of the Mississippian (the details of deformation prior to the Mississippian are not considered). Our reconstructions indicate that in addition to major Pennsylvanian-Early Permian fault reactivation during the Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogeny there was also deformation both prior to the post-Mississippian unconformity associated with uplift on the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and after the deposition of late Early-early Late Cretaceous sediments in the study area, potentially due to the Laramide orogeny. Results also indicate that the magnitude of the far-field stresses is sufficient to cause seismogenic reactivation on favorably oriented pre-existing faults. This history of reactivation of geologic structures in the central Midcontinent suggests that seismic hazards in the region in the present cannot be ruled out. Though dangerous large earthquakes are uncommon in the continental interior, seismic activity along the structures in the study area would threaten several large population centers and the potential for this activity should not be ignored

Geologic Mapping of Nebraska: Old Rocks, New Maps, Fresh Insights

Geologic mapping in Nebraska and environs is an ongoing endeavor that has spanned more than 170 years, involved dozens of scientists, and evolved through many changes. Digital mapping has risen to dominance in the state only since 1996. Geologic mapping in Nebraska today concentrates on surficial mapping, which emphasizes materials exposed at the land surface and their relationships with landforms, and which is particularly relevant because non- bedrock geologic materials (regolith) lie at the surface across at least 87% of the state. Moreover, surfi cial geologic maps assist the understanding of groundwater and sand and gravel resources, to name a few applications. The statewide bedrock map of Nebraska, which dates to 1986, remains an important and widely used geologic map, but it needs to be revised. Notwithstanding, when contemplated deeply, Nebraska’s statewide bedrock map reveals that (1) effects of gentle geologic structure, mainly those that came to be in the past 80 million years, can be discerned, and (2) some aspects of the map patterns (not the mapped sedimentary rocks per se) probably predate the beginning of the Pleistocene Epoch, about 2.6 million years ago. The geologic mapping of Nebraska, however, is far from completed

Evolution of three streambanks before and after stabilization and record flooding

Stabilization projects are increasingly used to mitigate the effects of anthropogenic streambank erosion, yet the effectiveness of stabilization has been insufficiently measured. Sound monitoring practices inform adjustments in implementation and maintenance, which improve engineered effectiveness. Thus, the objectives of this study were to: 1) measure streambank migration from in three reaches stabilized with wooden jetties following a major flooding event, and 2) quantify deposition around the jetties between pre-flood and post-flood. Streambank deposition was measured in 2019 with a River Surveyor and Global Positioning System (GPS). Bank erosion rates in Reaches 1, 2 and 3 were 0.41, 0.96 and 0.07 m2 m–1 yr–1, respectively, from pre-installation of wooden jetties. After streambanks in these reaches were stabilized, Reach 1 experienced 0.11 m2 m–1 yr–1 of erosion while Reaches 2 and 3 had 0.13 and 0.01 m2 m–1 yr–1 of deposition. Deposition increased in 2019 (1.61 and 0.81 m2 m–1) following a high magnitude flood. We utilized a new method for quantifying accumulated sediment in stream beds and banks. Our application of this new method demonstrates that jetties in the Cedar River have decreased streambank migration and increased sediment deposition at the point of implementation. The quantification of stream-sediment dynamics near jetties provides crucial information for stream-restoration design and decision-making, specifically for bioengineering design implementation