Social Image of the Ural Region Mining Workers at the Post-Reform Time Period

The article dwells upon a transition character of the Ural proletariat at the post-reform time period. Both domestic and foreign historiography define the social image of the Russian worker of the 20th century second part as either proletarian or referring to a “half-worker and half-peasant” type, combining traditional pre-capitalist features with newer ones, characteristic of industrial manufacture. A manufacturer’s being connected to the land as well as forming a certain mentality combined with the professional skills are considered the main criteria while defining the Russian workers’ typology. Taking into consideration the Urals old tradition of industrial manufacture, the process of forming an independent class at the area progressed rather vigorously. Despite of land allotments availability, workers in the Urals got under influence of modernization. Treating scornfully peasant work, industrial workers purposefully separated themselves from peasants. Nevertheless, it will be wrong to speak about complete disappearance of traditional peasant psychology among the Ural proletariat of the said time period. The working class at the region used to belong to a transition type, therefore we can speak about its incomplete establishment as a bourgeois society class

Developmental Education for University Students: Ways and Methods of its Organization

This article is devoted to the organization of developmental education of students of higher educational institutions. Based on works by I.A. Zimniaia, T.I. Iliin, V.V. Kraevskii, G.M. Kodzhaspirova, I.Ia. Lerner, I.F. Kharlamov and other researchers, the authors clarified the concept of “developmental education of university students", analyzed its components, systematized domestic and foreign experience in organizing developmental education in a higher educational institution. The article also presents the author’s set of pedagogical conditions, which contributes to the organization of developmental education for university students. This set includes the following components: correction of students' value orientations in the educational process of the university; the development of cognitive activity of students and the construction of the educational process at the university, subject to the requirements of a person-centered approach

Developmental Education for University Students: Ways and Methods of its Organization

This article is devoted to the organization of developmental education of students of higher educational institutions. Based on works by I.A. Zimniaia, T.I. Iliin, V.V. Kraevskii, G.M. Kodzhaspirova, I.Ia. Lerner, I.F. Kharlamov and other researchers, the authors clarified the concept of “developmental education of university students", analyzed its components, systematized domestic and foreign experience in organizing developmental education in a higher educational institution. The article also presents the author’s set of pedagogical conditions, which contributes to the organization of developmental education for university students. This set includes the following components: correction of students' value orientations in the educational process of the university; the development of cognitive activity of students and the construction of the educational process at the university, subject to the requirements of a person-centered approach.Este artículo está dedicado a la organización del desarrollo educativo de estudiantes de instituciones de educación superior. Basado en trabajos de I.A. Zimniaia, T.I. Iliin, V.V. Kraevskii, G.M. Kodzhaspirova, I.Ia. Lerner, I.F. Kharlamov y otros investigadores, los autores aclararon el concepto de "educación para el desarrollo de los estudiantes universitarios", analizaron sus componentes, sistematizaron la experiencia nacional y extranjera en la organización de la educación para el desarrollo en una institución de educación superior. El artículo también presenta el conjunto de condiciones pedagógicas del autor, que contribuye a la organización de la educación para el desarrollo de los estudiantes universitarios. Este conjunto incluye los siguientes componentes: corrección de las orientaciones de valor de los estudiantes en el proceso educativo de la universidad; el desarrollo de la actividad cognitiva de los estudiantes y la construcción del proceso educativo en la universidad, sujeto a los requisitos de un enfoque centrado en la person

Social Image of the Ural Region Mining Workers at the Post-Reform Time Period

The article dwells upon a transition character of the Ural proletariat at the post-reform time period. Both domestic and foreign historiography define the social image of the Russian worker of the 20th century second part as either proletarian or referring to a “half-worker and half-peasant” type, combining traditional pre-capitalist features with newer ones, characteristic of industrial manufacture. A manufacturer’s being connected to the land as well as forming a certain mentality combined with the professional skills are considered the main criteria while defining the Russian workers’ typology. Taking into consideration the Urals old tradition of industrial manufacture, the process of forming an independent class at the area progressed rather vigorously. Despite of land allotments availability, workers in the Urals got under influence of modernization. Treating scornfully peasant work, industrial workers purposefully separated themselves from peasants. Nevertheless, it will be wrong to speak about complete disappearance of traditional peasant psychology among the Ural proletariat of the said time period. The working class at the region used to belong to a transition type, therefore we can speak about its incomplete establishment as a bourgeois society class.El artículo se centra en un carácter de transición del proletariado de los Urales en el período posterior a la reforma. Tanto la historiografía doméstica como la extranjera definen la imagen social del trabajador ruso de la segunda parte del siglo XX como proletario o refiriéndose a un tipo “mitad trabajador y mitad campesino”, combinando rasgos precapitalistas tradicionales con otros más nuevos, propios de la industria. fabricar. La conexión de un fabricante con la tierra, así como la formación de una cierta mentalidad combinada con las habilidades profesionales, se consideran los criterios principales al definir la tipología de los trabajadores rusos. Teniendo en cuenta la antigua tradición de fabricación industrial de los Urales, el proceso de formación de una clase independiente en la zona avanzó bastante vigorosamente. A pesar de la disponibilidad de asignaciones de tierra, los trabajadores de los Urales se vieron afectados por la modernización. Al tratar con desprecio el trabajo campesino, los trabajadores industriales se separaron deliberadamente de los campesinos. Sin embargo, sería erróneo hablar de la desaparición total de la psicología campesina tradicional entre el proletariado Ural de dicho período. La clase obrera en la región solía pertenecer a un tipo de transición, por lo que podemos hablar de su establecimiento incompleto como clase de sociedad burguesa