A prospective multicenter cohort surveillance study of invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies in greece: impact of the revised eortc/msgerc 2020 criteria

Data concerning the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in high-risk patients in Greece are scarce, while the impact of the revised 2020 EORTC/MSGERC consensus criteria definitions on the reported incidence rate of IA remains unknown. A total of 93 adult hematology patients were screened for IA for six months in four tertiary care Greek hospitals. Serial serum specimens (n = 240) the sample was considered negative by PCR were collected twice-weekly and tested for galactomannan (GM) and Aspergillus DNA (PCR) detection. IA was defined according to both the 2008 EORTC/MSG and the 2020 EORTC/MSGERC consensus criteria. Based on the 2008 EORTC/MSG criteria, the incidence rates of probable and possible IA was 9/93 (10%) and 24/93 (26%), respectively, while no proven IA was documented. Acute myeloid leukemia was the most (67%) common underlying disease with most (82%) patients being on antifungal prophylaxis/treatment. Based on the new 2020 EORTC/MSGERC criteria, 2/9 (22%) of probable and 1/24 (4%) of possible cases should be reclassified as possible and probable, respectively. The episodes of probable IA were reduced by 33% when GM alone and 11% when GM + PCR were used as mycological criterion. The incidence rate of IA in hematology patients was 10%. Application of the 2020 EORTC/MSGERC updated criteria results in a reduction in the classification of probable IA particularly when PCR is not available. © 2021 by the authors. Li-censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland

Evaluation of the Dynamiker® Fungus (1–3)-β-d-Glucan Assay for the Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis in High-Risk Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Introduction: The Dynamiker® Fungus (1–3)-β-d-glucan assay (DFA) allows the testing of samples in smaller batches compared to the well-established Fungitell® assay (FA) making the assay cost-effective in centers with small numbers of samples. Evaluations of its performance for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) are limited. Therefore, we compared the two assays and evaluated their clinical performance in diagnosing IA. Methods: A total of 60 adult hematology patients were screened for IA, 13 with probable IA, 19 with possible IA, and 28 with no IA. Serum specimens (n = 166) were collected twice-weekly and tested for (1–3)-β-d-glucan (BDG) using FA and DFA which were compared quantitatively with Spearman rank correlation analysis and qualitatively with the Chi-square test. Agreement and error rates were determined using FA as the reference method. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive and negative predictive values in diagnosing IA were calculated. Results: The performance of the DFA was highly consistent with that of the FA, both quantitatively (rs = 0.913) and qualitatively (kappa = 0.725). The agreement was 85% with 8% minor, no major, and 7% very major errors (FA+/DFA−). Using a cut-off value of 20 pg/mL for DFA, very major errors were reduced to 1%, although 5% major errors were detected. BDG levels were lower with DFA than FA (slope 0.653 ± 0.031). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 67%, 53%, 44%, and 74% for FA, and 53%, 67%, 49%, and 71% for DFA, respectively. The optimal BDG positivity threshold calculated did not lead to significant test quality improvement for either assay. However, a higher % of patients with probable IA (62%) had ≥ 2 consecutive positive specimens compared to patients with no IA (FA-BDG 26%, p = 0.10, and DFA-BDG 10%, p = 0.01) leading to improved sensitivity and NPV (71% and 85% for DFA, and 95% and 96% for FA, respectively). Conclusion: DFA could be a valuable alternative to the FA, particularly in laboratories with small numbers of samples. The results of the BDG testing should be carefully interpreted in the high-risk setting of patients with hematologic malignancies. Higher NPV was found using as criterion ≥ 2 consecutive positive samples for diagnosing IA. © 2022, The Author(s)

Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

Contains fulltext : 125374.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Edoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with proven antithrombotic effects. The long-term efficacy and safety of edoxaban as compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing two once-daily regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in 21,105 patients with moderate-to-high-risk atrial fibrillation (median follow-up, 2.8 years). The primary efficacy end point was stroke or systemic embolism. Each edoxaban regimen was tested for noninferiority to warfarin during the treatment period. The principal safety end point was major bleeding. RESULTS: The annualized rate of the primary end point during treatment was 1.50% with warfarin (median time in the therapeutic range, 68.4%), as compared with 1.18% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.99; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 1.07; 97.5% CI, 0.87 to 1.31; P=0.005 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was a trend favoring high-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.87; 97.5% CI, 0.73 to 1.04; P=0.08) and an unfavorable trend with low-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.13; 97.5% CI, 0.96 to 1.34; P=0.10). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin versus 2.75% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91; P<0.001) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55; P<0.001). The corresponding annualized rates of death from cardiovascular causes were 3.17% versus 2.74% (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), and 2.71% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P=0.008), and the corresponding rates of the key secondary end point (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes) were 4.43% versus 3.85% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; P=0.005), and 4.23% (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Both once-daily regimens of edoxaban were noninferior to warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and were associated with significantly lower rates of bleeding and death from cardiovascular causes. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00781391.)