9 research outputs found

    Extensive Cardiac Function Analyses Using Contemporary Echocardiography in Childhood Cancer Survivors:A DCCSS LATER Study

    Get PDF
    Background: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk for cardiotoxicity.Objectives: We sought to assess how cardiac dysfunction measurements in CCS overlap and are differentially influenced by risk factors.Methods: This cross-sectional Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study evaluated echocardiograms of 1,397 ≄5-year CCS and 277 siblings. Of CCS, n = 1,254 received cardiotoxic (anthracyclines/mitoxantrone/radiotherapy involving the heart region [RTheart]) and n = 143 received potentially cardiotoxic (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, or vincristine) therapy. We assessed demographic, treatment-related, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors for cardiac dysfunction using multivariable logistic regression.Results: CCS were a median of 26.7 years after diagnosis; 49% were women. Abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (defined as &lt;52% in men, &lt;54% in women) occurred most commonly in CCS treated with anthracyclines and RTheart combined (38%). Age/sex-specific abnormal global longitudinal strain (GLS) occurred most commonly in CCS treated with RTheart, either with (41%) or without (38%) anthracyclines. Of CCS with normal LVEF, 20.2% showed abnormal GLS. Diastolic dysfunction grade ≄II was rare. Abnormal LVEF was mainly associated with female sex, anthracycline dose, and only in women, RTheart dose. Abnormal GLS was associated with female sex, RTheart dose, diastolic blood pressure, and only in women, anthracycline dose. Cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and vincristine were not associated with LVEF or GLS. Compared with siblings, CCS showed higher risk of abnormal LVEF (OR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.4-6.6) and GLS (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.7), independent of (potentially) cardiotoxic treatment-related and cardiovascular risk factors.Conclusions: Abnormal LVEF and GLS constitute complementary measures of systolic dysfunction among long-term CCS. Their diagnostic value may differ according to cardiotoxic exposures. Also, CCS have residual, unexplained risk of cardiac dysfunction.</p

    Risk and Temporal Changes of Heart Failure Among 5-Year Childhood Cancer Survivors: a DCOG-LATER Study

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 201237.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

    Trimetazidine in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized controlled cross‐over trial

    No full text
    Abstract Aims Impaired myocardial energy homeostasis plays an import role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Left ventricular relaxation has a high energy demand, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction has been related to impaired energy homeostasis. This study investigated whether trimetazidine, a fatty acid oxidation inhibitor, could improve myocardial energy homeostasis and consequently improve exercise haemodynamics in patients with HFpEF. Methods and results The DoPING‐HFpEF trial was a phase II single‐centre, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized cross‐over trial. Patients were randomized to trimetazidine treatment or placebo for 3 months and switched after a 2‐week wash‐out period. The primary endpoint was change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, measured with right heart catheterization at multiple stages of bicycling exercise. Secondary endpoint was change in myocardial phosphocreatine/adenosine triphosphate, an index of the myocardial energy status, measured with phosphorus‐31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The study included 25 patients (10/15 males/females; mean (standard deviation) age, 66 (10) years; body mass index, 29.8 (4.5) kg/m2); with the diagnosis of HFpEF confirmed with (exercise) right heart catheterization either before or during the trial. There was no effect of trimetazidine on the primary outcome pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at multiple levels of exercise (mean change 0 [95% confidence interval, 95% CI −2, 2] mmHg over multiple levels of exercise, P = 0.60). Myocardial phosphocreatine/adenosine triphosphate in the trimetazidine arm was similar to placebo (1.08 [0.76, 1.76] vs. 1.30 [0.95, 1.86], P = 0.08). There was no change by trimetazidine compared with placebo in the exploratory parameters: 6‐min walking distance (mean change of −6 [95% CI −18, 7] m vs. −5 [95% CI −22, 22] m, respectively, P = 0.93), N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (5 (−156, 166) ng/L vs. −13 (−172, 147) ng/L, P = 0.70), overall quality‐of‐life (KCCQ and EQ‐5D‐5L, P = 0.78 and P = 0.51, respectively), parameters for diastolic function measured with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance, or metabolic parameters. Conclusions Trimetazidine did not improve myocardial energy homeostasis and did not improve exercise haemodynamics in patients with HFpEF

    Digital consults to optimize guideline‐directed therapy: design of a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial

    No full text
    Abstract Aims Many heart failure (HF) patients do not receive optimal guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT) despite clear benefit on morbidity and mortality outcomes. Digital consults (DCs) have the potential to improve efficiency on GDMT optimization to serve the growing HF population. The investigator‐initiated ADMINISTER trial was designed as a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled open‐label trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of DC in patients on HF treatment. Methods and results Patients (n = 150) diagnosed with HF with a reduced ejection fraction will be randomized to DC or standard care (1:1). The intervention group receives multifaceted DCs including (i) digital data sharing (e.g. exchange of pharmacotherapy use and home‐measured vital signs), (ii) patient education via an e‐learning, and (iii) digital guideline recommendations to treating clinicians. The consults are performed remotely unless there is an indication to perform the consult physically. The primary outcome is the GDMT prescription rate score, and secondary outcomes include time till full GDMT optimization, patient and clinician satisfaction, time spent on healthcare, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Results will be reported in accordance to the CONSORT statement. Conclusions The ADMINISTER trial will offer the first randomized controlled data on GDMT prescription rates, time till full GDMT optimization, time spent on healthcare, quality of life, and patient and clinician satisfaction of the multifaceted patient‐ and clinician‐targeted DC for GDMT optimization

    Cardiac function in childhood cancer survivors treated with vincristine: Echocardiographic results from the DCCSS LATER 2 CARD study

    No full text
    Background: Anthracyclines and radiotherapy involving the heart region are cardiotoxic, but the potential cardiotoxicity of vincristine remains unknown. We assessed cardiac function in vincristine-treated >5-year childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Methods and results: We cross-sectionally compared echocardiograms of 101 vincristine-treated CCS (median age 35 years [range: 17–53], median vincristine dose 63 mg/m2) from the national Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, LATER cohort, to 101 age- and sex-matched controls. CCS treated with anthracyclines, radiotherapy involving the heart region, cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide were excluded. Twelve CCS (14%) versus four controls (4%; p 0.034) had a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; men <52%, women <54%). Mean LVEF was 58.4% versus 59.7% (p 0.050). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was abnormal in nineteen (24%) CCS versus eight controls (9%; p 0.011). Mean GLS was 19.0% versus 20.1% (p 0.001). No ≄grade 2 diastolic dysfunction was detected. In multivariable logistic regression analysis CCS had higher risk of abnormal GLS (OR 3.55, p 0.012), but not abnormal LVEF (OR 3.07, p 0.065), than controls. Blood pressure and smoking history contributed to variation in LVEF, whereas obesity and diastolic blood pressure contributed to variation in GLS. Cumulative vincristine dose was not associated with either abnormal LVEF or abnormal GLS in multivariable models corrected for age and sex (OR per 50 mg/m2: 0.88, p 0.85 and 1.14, p 0.82, respectively). Conclusions: Vincristine-treated long-term CCS showed an abnormal GLS more frequently than controls. Their risk for future clinical cardiac events and the role of risk factor modification should be further elucidated

    Cardiac function in childhood cancer survivors treated with vincristine: Echocardiographic results from the DCCSS LATER 2 CARD study

    Get PDF
    Background: Anthracyclines and radiotherapy involving the heart region are cardiotoxic, but the potential cardiotoxicity of vincristine remains unknown. We assessed cardiac function in vincristine-treated >5-year childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Methods and results: We cross-sectionally compared echocardiograms of 101 vincristine-treated CCS (median age 35 years [range: 17–53], median vincristine dose 63 mg/m2) from the national Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, LATER cohort, to 101 age- and sex-matched controls. CCS treated with anthracyclines, radiotherapy involving the heart region, cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide were excluded. Twelve CCS (14%) versus four controls (4%; p 0.034) had a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; men <52%, women <54%). Mean LVEF was 58.4% versus 59.7% (p 0.050). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was abnormal in nineteen (24%) CCS versus eight controls (9%; p 0.011). Mean GLS was 19.0% versus 20.1% (p 0.001). No ≄grade 2 diastolic dysfunction was detected. In multivariable logistic regression analysis CCS had higher risk of abnormal GLS (OR 3.55, p 0.012), but not abnormal LVEF (OR 3.07, p 0.065), than controls. Blood pressure and smoking history contributed to variation in LVEF, whereas obesity and diastolic blood pressure contributed to variation in GLS. Cumulative vincristine dose was not associated with either abnormal LVEF or abnormal GLS in multivariable models corrected for age and sex (OR per 50 mg/m2: 0.88, p 0.85 and 1.14, p 0.82, respectively). Conclusions: Vincristine-treated long-term CCS showed an abnormal GLS more frequently than controls. Their risk for future clinical cardiac events and the role of risk factor modification should be further elucidated
    corecore