A Phase III Randomized Trial of Gemcitabine–Oxaliplatin versus Carboplatin–Paclitaxel as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose:This phase III study compared the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PCb) in chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer.Patients and Methods:Patients aged 18 years or older were randomized to PCb (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin area under the curve = 6 on day 1 every 3 weeks) or GEMOX (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks) for up to six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), with tumor response rate, overall survival (OS), and quality of life as secondary end points.Results:The study was terminated after 383 patients had been randomized (371 received treatment) as the incidence of adverse events had exceeded the protocol-specified safety threshold (≥20% in either arm). No formal statistical comparisons were conducted. Median PFS was 4.44 months and 4.67 months in the GEMOX and PCb groups, respectively. Objective response rates (complete or partial) were 15.2% and 22.4% in the GEMOX and PCb arms, respectively. Median OS was 9.90 months (GEMOX) and 9.24 months (PCb); post hoc analyses showed median OS in patients aged 70 years or older to be similar to those younger than 70 years. PFS was similar in both groups of patients with adenocarcinoma histology, although OS favored the GEMOX group. Quality of life was improved from baseline in both groups. Toxicity profiles were comparable between the groups.Conclusion:PFS, OS, and objective response rates with GEMOX were similar to PCb. Nevertheless, toxicities limit the adoption of this regimen for routine use in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia provides greater pain relief at higher dose rates

In Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery, dose rate decreases during the life cycle of its radiation source, extending treatment times. Prolonged treatments influence the amount of sublethal radiation injury that is repaired during exposure, and is associated with decreased biologically-equivalent dose (BED). We assessed the impact of treatment times on clinical outcomes following GK of the trigeminal nerve - a rare clinical model to isolate the effects of treatment times. This is a retrospective analysis of 192 patients with facial pain treated across three source exchanges. All patients were treated to 80 Gy with a single isocenter. Treatment time was analyzed in terms of patient anatomy-specific dose rate, as well as BED calculated from individual patient beam-on times. An outcome tool measuring pain in three distinct domains (pain intensity, interference with general and oro-facial activities of daily living), was administered before and after intervention. Multivariate linear regression was performed with dose rate/BED, brainstem dose, sex, age, diagnosis, and prior intervention as predictors. BED was an independent predictor of the degree of improvement in all three dimensions of pain severity. A decrease in dose rate by 1.5 Gy/min corresponded to 31.8% less improvement in the overall severity of pain. Post-radiosurgery incidence of facial numbness was increased for BEDs in the highest quartile. Treatment time is an independent predictor of pain outcomes, suggesting that prescription dose should be customized to ensure iso-effective treatments, while accounting for the possible increase in adverse effects at the highest BEDs