85 research outputs found
Nothing more than a pair of curvatures: A common mechanism for the detection of both radial and non-radial frequency patterns.
Radial frequency (RF) patterns, which are sinusoidal modulations of a radius in polar coordinates, are commonly used to study shape perception. Previous studies have argued that the detection of RF patterns is either achieved globally by a specialized global shape mechanism, or locally using as cue the maximum tangent orientation difference between the RF pattern and the circle. Here we challenge both ideas and suggest instead a model that accounts not only for the detection of RF patterns but also for line frequency patterns (LF), i.e. contours sinusoidally modulated around a straight line. The model has two features. The first is that the detection of both RF and LF patterns is based on curvature differences along the contour. The second is that this curvature metric is subject to what we term the Curve Frequency Sensitivity Function, or CFSF, which is characterized by a flat followed by declining response to curvature as a function of modulation frequency, analogous to the modulation transfer function of the eye. The evidence that curvature forms the basis for detection is that at very low modulation frequencies (1-3 cycles for the RF pattern) there is a dramatic difference in thresholds between the RF and LF patterns, a difference however that disappears at medium and high modulation frequencies. The CFSF feature on the other hand explains why thresholds, rather than continuously declining with modulation frequency, asymptote at medium and high modulation frequencies. In summary, our analysis suggests that the detection of shape modulations is processed by a common curvature-sensitive mechanism that is subject to a shape-frequency-dependent transfer function. This mechanism is independent of whether the modulation is applied to a circle or a straight line
Recommended from our members
Detection of between-eye differences in color: Interactions with luminance
Modeling probability and additive summation for detection across multiple mechanisms under the assumptions of signal detection theory.
Many studies have investigated how multiple stimuli combine to reach threshold. There are broadly speaking two ways this can occur: additive summation (AS) where inputs from the different stimuli add together in a single mechanism, or probability summation (PS) where different stimuli are detected independently by separate mechanisms. PS is traditionally modeled under high threshold theory (HTT); however, tests have shown that HTT is incorrect and that signal detection theory (SDT) is the better framework for modeling summation. Modeling the equivalent of PS under SDT is, however, relatively complicated, leading many investigators to use Monte Carlo simulations for the predictions. We derive formulas that employ numerical integration to predict the proportion correct for detecting multiple stimuli assuming PS under SDT, for the situations in which stimuli are either equal or unequal in strength. Both formulas are general purpose, calculating performance for forced-choice tasks with M alternatives, n stimuli, in Q monitored mechanisms, each subject to a non-linear transducer with exponent Ï„. We show how the probability (and additive) summation formulas can be used to simulate psychometric functions, which when fitted with Weibull functions make signature predictions for how thresholds and psychometric function slopes vary as a function of Ï„, n, and Q. We also show how one can fit the formulas directly to real psychometric functions using data from a binocular summation experiment, and show how one can obtain estimates of Ï„ and test whether binocular summation conforms more to PS or AS. The methods described here can be readily applied using software functions newly added to the Palamedes toolbox
Texture variations suppress suprathreshold brightness and colour variations
Discriminating material changes from illumination changes is a key function of early vision. Luminance cues are ambiguous in this regard, but can be disambiguated by co-incident changes in colour and texture. Thus, colour and texture are likely to be given greater prominence than luminance for object segmentation, and better segmentation should in turn produce stronger grouping. We sought to measure the relative strengths of combined luminance, colour and texture contrast using a suprathreshhold, psychophysical grouping task. Stimuli comprised diagonal grids of circular patches bordered by a thin black line and contained combinations of luminance decrements with either violet, red, or texture increments. There were two tasks. In the Separate task the different cues were presented separately in a two-interval design, and participants indicated which interval contained the stronger orientation structure. In the Combined task the cues were combined to produce competing orientation structure in a single image. Participants had to indicate which orientation, and therefore which cue was dominant. Thus we established the relative grouping strength of each cue pair presented separately, and compared this to their relative grouping strength when combined. In this way we observed suprathreshold interactions between cues and were able to assess cue dominance at ecologically relevant signal levels. Participants required significantly more luminance and colour compared to texture contrast in the Combined compared to Separate conditions (contrast ratios differed by about 0.1 log units), showing that suprathreshold texture dominates colour and luminance when the different cues are presented in combination
Rejecting probability summation for radial frequency patterns, not so Quick!
Radial frequency (RF) patterns are used to assess how the visual system processes shape. They are thought to be detected globally. This is supported by studies that have found summation for RF patterns to be greater than what is possible if the parts were being independently detected and performance only then improved with an increasing number of cycles by probability summation between them. However, the model of probability summation employed in these previous studies was based on High Threshold Theory (HTT), rather than Signal Detection Theory (SDT). We conducted rating scale experiments to investigate the receiver operating characteristics. We find these are of the curved form predicted by SDT, rather than the straight lines predicted by HTT. This means that to test probability summation we must use a model based on SDT. We conducted a set of summation experiments finding that thresholds decrease as the number of modulated cycles increases at approximately the same rate as previously found. As this could be consistent with either additive or probability summation, we performed maximum-likelihood fitting of a set of summation models (Matlab code provided in our Supplementary material) and assessed the fits using cross validation. We find we are not able to distinguish whether the responses to the parts of an RF pattern are combined by additive or probability summation, because the predictions are too similar. We present similar results for summation between separate RF patterns, suggesting that the summation process there may be the same as that within a single RF
Searching for Radial Symmetry
Symmetry is ubiquitous in the natural world. Numerous investigations, dating back over one
hundred years, have explored the visual processing of symmetry. However, these studies have
been concerned with mirror symmetry, overlooking radial (or rotational) symmetry, which is also
prevalent in nature. Using a visual search paradigm, which approximates the everyday task of
searching for an object embedded in background clutter, we have measured how quickly and
how accurately human observers detect radially symmetric dot patterns. Performance was
compared with mirror symmetry. We found that with orders of radial symmetry greater than
5, radial symmetry can be detected more easily than mirror symmetry, revealing for the first time
that radial symmetry is a salient property of objects for human vision.Canadian Institute of Health Researc
Common contextual influences in ambiguous and rivalrous figures
Images that resist binocular fusion undergo alternating periods of dominance and suppression,
similarly to ambiguous figures whose percepts alternate between two interpretations. It
has been well documented that the perceptual interpretations of both rivalrous and ambiguous
figures are influenced by their spatio-temporal context. Here we consider whether an
identical spatial context similarly influences the interpretation of a similar rivalrous and
ambiguous figure. We developed a binocularly rivalrous stimulus whose perceptual experience
mirrors that of a Necker cube. We employed a paradigm similar to that of Ouhnana
and Kingdom (2016) to correlate the magnitude of influence of context between the rivalrous
and ambiguous target. Our results showed that the magnitude of contextual influence is significantly
correlated within observers between both binocularly rivalrous and ambiguous target
figures. This points to a similar contextual-influence mechanism operating on a common
mechanism underlying the perceptual instability in both ambiguous and rivalrous figures.Canadian Institute of Health Researc
The role of spatial frequency in emotional face classification
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1377-7Canadian Institute of Health Researc
Adaptation to interocular difference
Patterns in the two eyes' views that are not identical in hue or contrast often elicit an impression of luster, providing a cue for discriminating them from perfectly matched patterns. Here we ask whether the mechanism for detecting interocular differences (IDs) is adaptable. Our stimuli were horizontally oriented multispatial-frequency grating patterns that could be subject to varying degrees of ID through the introduction of interocular phase differences in the grating components. Subjects adapted to patterns that were either correlated, uncorrelated, monocular (one eye only), or anticorrelated. Following adaptation, thresholds for detecting IDs were measured using a staircase procedure. It was found that ID thresholds were elevated following adaptation to uncorrelated, monocular, and anticorrelated but not correlated patterns. Threshold elevation was found to be maximal when the orientations of the adaptor and test gratings were the same, and when their spatial frequencies were similar. The results support the existence of a specialized mechanism for detecting IDs, the most likely candidate being the binocular differencing channel proposed in previous studies.Canadian Institute of Health Researc
Pupil dilation to illusory motion in peripheral drift images: Perception versus reality
Peripheral drift is a specific type of illusory motion that
causes observers to perceive motion in a static image.
We aimed to determine whether pupil dilation occurs
during the perception of illusory motion. In three
experiments investigating pupil-size changes to
peripheral drift, pupil response differences were
observed between symmetric patterns (SPs) that elicited
no impression of motion and repeated asymmetric
patterns (RAPs) that did. All participants reported the
perception of motion in the RAP condition and showed
significantly greater pupil dilation to these stimuli as
compared with viewing stimuli in the SP condition. As a
follow-up, we manipulated the RAP stimuli to reduce
and then remove the illusion to determine (a) whether it
was the asymmetry per se that induced the pupil dilation
and (b) whether the amount of pupil dilation was
contingent on the amount of observed illusory motion.
Although a reduction in perceived illusory motion did
not produce a reduction in pupil dilation, removal of the
illusory motion did. Despite previous evidence reporting
pupil constriction to the perception of motion, and the
positive valence associated with symmetry, these
experiments show that pupil dilation occurs during the
perception of illusory motion. This is in keeping with
previous evidence that pupil dilation is influenced by
perceptual factors and not simply light level, and, in
particular, shows that illusory motion is physiologically
arousingCanadian Institute of Healt
- …