Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Despite treatment being in line with current guidelines, mortality remains high in those with septic shock. Intravenous immunoglobulins represent a promising therapy to modulate both the pro- and anti-inflammatory processes and can contribute to the elimination of pathogens. In this context, there is evidence of the benefits of immunoglobulin M (IgM)- and immunoglobulin A (IgA)-enriched immunoglobulin therapy for sepsis. This manuscript aims to summarize current relevant data to provide expert opinions on best practice for the use of an IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin (Pentaglobin) in adult patients with sepsis. Main text: Sepsis patients with hyperinflammation and patients with immunosuppression may benefit most from treatment with IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin (Pentaglobin). Patients with hyperinflammation present with phenotypes that manifest throughout the body, whilst the clinical characteristics of immunosuppression are less clear. Potential biomarkers for hyperinflammation include elevated procalcitonin, interleukin-6, endotoxin activity and C-reactive protein, although thresholds for these are not well-defined. Convenient biomarkers for identifying patients in a stage of immune-paralysis are still matter of debate, though human leukocyte antigen–antigen D related expression on monocytes, lymphocyte count and viral reactivation have been proposed. The timing of treatment is potentially more critical for treatment efficacy in patients with hyperinflammation compared with patients who are in an immunosuppressed stage. Due to the lack of evidence, definitive dosage recommendations for either population cannot be made, though we suggest that patients with hyperinflammation should receive an initial bolus at a rate of up to 0.6 mL (30 mg)/kg/h for 6 h followed by a continuous maintenance rate of 0.2 mL (10 mg)/kg/hour for ≥ 72 h (total dose ≥ 0.9 g/kg). For immunosuppressed patients, dosage is more conservative (0.2 mL [10 mg]/kg/h) for ≥ 72 h, without an initial bolus (total dose ≥ 0.72 g/kg). Conclusions: Two distinct populations that may benefit most from Pentaglobin therapy are described in this review. However, further clinical evidence is required to strengthen support for the recommendations given here regarding timing, duration and dosage of treatment

Insulin adsorption to catheter materials used for intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: Polyethylene versus polyurethane - possible cause of variation in glucose control?

Introduction: Restoring and maintaining normoglycemia by intensified insulin therapy in critically ill patients is a matter of ongoing debate since the risk of hypoglycemia may outweigh positive effects on morbidity and mortality. In this context, adsorption of insulin to different catheter materials may contribute to instability of glucose control. We studied the adsorption of insulin to different tubing materials in vitro and the effects on glycemic control in vivo. Materials and Methods: In vitro experiments: A syringe pump was filled with 50 IU insulin diluted to 50 ml saline. A flow of 2 ml/h was perfused through polyethylene (PET) or polyurethane (PUR) tubing. Insulin concentrations were measured at the end of the tube for 24 hours using Bradford's protein assay. In vivo study: In a randomized double-blinded cross-over design, 10 intensive care patients received insulin via PET and PUR tubes for 24 hours each, targeting blood glucose levels of 80-150 mg/dl. We measured blood glucose levels, the insulin dose required to maintain target levels, and serum insulin and C-peptide levels. Results: In vitro experiments: After the start of the insulin infusion, only 20% (median, IQR 20-27) (PET) and 22% (IQR 16-27) (PUR) of the prepared insulin concentration were measured at the end of the 2 meter tubing. Using PET, after one hour infusion the concentration increased to 34% (IQR 29-36) and did not increase significantly during the next 24 hours (39% (IQR 39-40)). Using PUR, higher concentrations were detected than for PET at every measurement from 1 hour (82% (IQR 70-86)) to 24 hours (79% (IQR 64-87)). In vivo study: Glycemic control was effective and not different between groups. Significantly higher volumes of insulin solution had to be infused with PET compared to PUR (median PET 70.0 (IQR 56-82) ml vs. PUR 42 (IQR 31-63) ml; p=0.0015). Serum insulin concentrations did not decrease significantly one hour after changing to PET or PUR tubing. Conclusion: Polyurethane tubing systems allow application of insulin with significantly lower adsorption rates than polyethylene tubing systems. As a consequence, less insulin solution has to be infused to patients for effective blood glucose control. Tubing material of the insulin infusion may be crucial for safe and effective glycemic control in critically ill patients

Secreted Cytokines within the Urine of AKI Patients Modulate TP53 and SIRT1 Levels in a Human Podocyte Cell Model

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major kidney disease with a poor clinical outcome. It is a common complication, with an incidence of 10–15% of patients admitted to hospital. This rate even increases for patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit, with an incidence of >50%. AKI is characterized by a rapid increase in serum creatinine, decrease in urine output, or both. The associated symptoms include feeling sick or being sick, diarrhoea, dehydration, decreased urine output (although occasionally the urine output remains normal), fluid retention causing swelling in the legs or ankles, shortness of breath, fatigue and nausea. However, sometimes acute kidney injury causes no signs or symptoms and is detected by lab tests. Therefore, the identification of cytokines for the early detection and diagnosis of AKI is highly desirable, as their application might enable the prevention of the progression from AKI to chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this study, we analysed the secretome of the urine of an AKI patient cohort by employing a kidney-biomarker cytokine assay. Based on these results, we suggest ADIPOQ, EGF and SERPIN3A as potential cytokines that might be able to detect AKI as early as 24 h post-surgery. For the later stages, as common cytokines for the detection of AKI in both male and female patients, we suggest VEGF, SERPIN3A, TNFSF12, ANPEP, CXCL1, REN, CLU and PLAU. These cytokines in combination might present a robust strategy for identifying the development of AKI as early as 24 h or 72 h post-surgery. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of patient and healthy urine on human podocyte cells. We conclude that cytokines abundant in the urine of AKI patients trigger processes that are needed to repair the damaged nephron and activate TP53 and SIRT1 to maintain the balance between proliferation, angiogenesis, and cell cycle arrest

Levosimendan in Acute and Advanced Heart Failure : An Appraisal of the Clinical Database and Evaluation of Its Therapeutic Applications

The use of inotropes for correcting hemodynamic dysfunction in patients with congestive heart failure has been described over many decades. However, negative or insufficient data have been collected regarding the effects of cardiac glycosides, catecholamines, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors on quality of life and survival. More recently, the calcium sensitizer and potassium channel-opener levosimendan has been proposed as a safer inodilator than traditional agents in some heart failure settings, such as advanced heart failure. At the 2017 annual congress of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (Paris, April 30-May 2), a series of tutorials delivered by lecturers from 8 European countries examined how to use levosimendan safely and effectively in acute and advanced heart failure. The proceedings of those tutorials have been collated in this review to provide an expert perspective on the optimized use of levosimendan in those settings.Peer reviewe

Aktueller Stand der Durchführung von Nierenersatztherapien auf deutschen Intensivstationen

About 50% of all critically ill patients develop acute kidney injury (AKI) and approximately 15% receive renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although RRT is frequently used in intensive care units in Germany, it is currently unknown which RRT procedures are available, which qualification the involved staff has, which anticoagulation strategies are used and how RRT doses are prescribed. To investigate quality and structural characteristics of the performance of RRT in intensive care units throughout Germany, the German Interdisciplinary Society of Intensivists (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin [DIVI]) performed an inquiry among their members. A total of 897 members participated in the survey in which practical aspects were queried. In 69.1% of the cases, RRT was performed in hospitals with more than 400 beds and in 74.5% in university hospitals or other primary care hospitals. Furthermore, 93.3% of clinics are equipped with continuous and 75.8% with intermittent renal replacement devices. In 91.9%, indication for initiation of RRT was performed by trained physicians specialized in intensive care medicine or nephrologists. Intermittent as well as continuous modalities are both present in three-quarters of cases, which allows for individualized therapy. However, the documentation of dialysis dose needs to be improved.Eine akute Nierenschädigung (AKI) tritt heute bei 50 % aller kritisch kranken Patienten auf und etwa 15 % müssen mit einer Nierenersatztherapie (NET) behandelt werden. Obwohl eine NET ein häufiges und essenzielles Organersatzverfahren in der deutschen Intensivmedizin darstellt, ist es ist nicht bekannt, in welchem Umfang Nierenersatzverfahren zur Verfügung stehen, wer mit welcher Qualifikation eine NET durchführt, welche Formen der Antikoagulation verwendet werden und wie die Dosis der NET verschrieben wird. Die Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI) hat deshalb Ende 2019 unter ihren Mitgliedern eine Umfrage zu den strukturellen Gegebenheiten der NET in ihrem Arbeitsumfeld durchgeführt. Es konnten 897 Datensätze erfasst werden (31,1 % der Befragten), anhand derer die aktuellen strukturellen und prozeduralen Gegebenheiten bei der Durchführung der NET auf deutschen Intensivstationen beschrieben werden können. Es waren Krankenhäuser aller Versorgungsstufen vertreten, allerdings waren Krankenhäuser mit einer Bettenzahl von > 400 Betten (69,1 %) und Krankenhäuser der Schwerpunkt- und Maximalversorgung und Unikliniken (74,5 %) verstärkt vertreten. Kontinuierliche Nierenersatzverfahren stehen auf 93,3 % und intermittierende Verfahren auf 75,8 % der Intensivstationen in Deutschland zur Verfügung. Die Indikation zur NET wird in 91,9 % durch eine/n Facharzt/Fachärztin oder einen Facharzt/Fachärztin mit Zusatzweiterbildung Intensivmedizin und/oder Nephrologie gestellt. In Fragen der Therapiedurchführung sind jedoch Aspekte der Dialysedosis besser zu implementieren und dokumentieren

Recurrent early filter clotting during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation is linked to systemic thrombin generation and heparin induced thrombocytopenia type II: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is widely used and leads to an excellent clottingfree filter survival. Despite strict adherence to protocols, in some cases recurrent early filter-clotting occurs. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the underlying causes and the efficacy of interventions in patients with early recurrent filter-clotting during RCA. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 1183 patients treated with RCA-CRRT we detected 12 patients with early filter-clotting unrelated to protocol violation or any obvious technical or medical reason. RESULTS: All patients were systemically anticoagulated with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin for at least 24h before initiation of Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodialysis with RCA (RCA-CVVHD). During RCA, all postfilter ionized calcium concentrations were in the target range (mean 0.33±0.05 mmol/L). At the time of the first clotting event, thrombocyte counts were 168±66/ nL. After the clotting events, the systemic anticoagulation was switched to argatroban in all patients. With systemic anticoagulation using argatroban filter lifetime of RCA-CVVHD increased significantly (p<0.001) and clotting-events decreased from 0.61 to 0.10 per 24h. All patients were tested for HIT and 5/12 (42%) had a positive test for hep-PF4-antibodies. Application of argatroban significantly reduced early filter-clotting both in HIT-positive patients as well as in HIT-negative patients. At the time of the first clotting event, no patient had clinical signs of thrombosis or thromboembolism. However, during follow up a thromboembolic event occurred in three patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with recurrent early filter-clotting despite strict adherence to the citrate protocol undetected HIT or other causes of thrombin activation may be present. Therefore, patients with recurrent early filter clotting in RCA-CVVHD should be screened for HIT or other conditions that may activate thrombin. A significant improvement of filter run-time can be achieved by systemic administration of a thrombin inhibitor both in patients with and without HIT