Screening of bone mineral density (BMD) among elderly population in Jordan

Introduction: The health of the skeletal system is a vital issue in elderlies, hence, screening studies that investigate elders' bone health and identify associated factors affecting bone density are of prime importance. This study purposed to evaluate bone mineral density levels and examine its relationship with socio-demographic and clinical data, and body measurements among Jordanian elderlies aged 60 years and over. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study was used using a systematic random sampling technique to recruit 155 participants in Amman governorate. A questionnaire consists of socio-demographic and clinical data, and a form measures bone mineral density and body mass index were used. Bone mineral density was measured using a CM200 light device, where the T-score used to assess the bone mineral density. The T -scores equal -1 < -2.5 indicate osteopenia, while < -2.5 reflect osteoporosis. Results: Of the 151 subjects with completed data, 34.5% osteopenia, and 9.2% osteoporosis. The lowest bone mineral density was observed among older participants, divorced, illiterate, experiencing arthritis disease, and had a family history of osteoporosis and fractures. Sex, marital status, number of cola glasses, and number of cigarettes had a negative correlation with T-score, conversely, arthritis and family history of fracture had a positive correlation. The number of cola glasses was the main predictor. Conclusion: Jordanian elderlies experienced low bone mineral density. Developing appropriate health promotion programs for changing unhealthy behaviors and screening purposes are needed to enhance the knowledge of bones health and reduce the risks of developing osteopenia or osteoporosis

Fibro-check: a combination of direct and indirect markers for liver fibrosis staging in chronic hepatitis C patients

Background and rationale for the study. The assessment of liver fibrosis provides useful information not only for diagnosis but also for therapeutic decision. This study was concerned with determining the levels of collagen III and its degrading enzyme matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) as direct and complementary markers for liver fibrosis staging.Results. A total of 269 chronic hepatitis C patients constituted this study. Western blotting was used for identifying collagen III and MMP-1 in serum samples. As a result, collagen III and MMP-1 were identified, respectively, at 70 and 245 kDa using their respective mono-specific antibodies. These two markers were quantified in sera of patients using ELISA. Next, Fibro-check was constructed combining collagen III and MMP-1 together with other indirect markers which reflect alteration in hepatic functions that proved useful to stage liver fibrosis. Fibro-check produced area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.91 and 0.83 for significant (F2-F4) and cirrhosis (F4), respectively. Additionally, we estimated the performance of Fibro-check in comparison with aspartate to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index. Fibro-check seems to be more efficient than both of them. Fibro-check was then applied to the validation study to test its accuracy and reproducibility showing AUCs 0.90 for F2-F4 and 0.86 for F4.Conclusions. Fibro-check combining ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ markers using a mathematical formula may improve the staging of liver fibrosis with a high degree of accuracy and seems more efficient than APRI and Fibrosis index in this group of Egyptian patients

A simple diagnostic index comprising epithelial membrane antigen and fibronectin for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and rationale for the study. Continuing search for suitable tumor-markers is of clinical value in managing patients with various malignancies. These markers may be presented as intracellular substances in tissues or may be released into the circulation and appear in serum. Therefore, this work is concerned with identification and quantitative determination of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and fibronectin and estimating their performances as surrogate markers for identifying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Results. A total of 627 individuals constituted this study [fibrosis (F1-F3) = 217; cirrhosis = 191; HCC = 219]. Western-blot was used for identifying EMA and fibronectin in sera. As a result, a single immunoreactive band was shown at 130-kDa and 90-kDa corresponding to EMA and fibronectin, respectively. They were quantified using ELISA providing values in HCC higher than fibrosis or cirrhosis with a significant difference (P < 0.0001). For identifying HCC, EMA showed 0.82 area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) with sensitivity = 70% and specificity = 78% while fibronectin yielded AUC = 0.70 with sensitivity = 67% and specificity = 82%. FEBA-Test comprising fibronectin and EMA together with total-bilirubin and AFP was constructed yielding AUC = 0.92 for identifying HCC from cirrhosis with sensitivity = 89% and specificity = 85%. FEBA-Test was then tested for differentiating HCC from fibrosis showing AUC = 0.97 with sensitivity = 90% and specificity = 89%. FEBA-Test enabled the correct identification of HCC patients with CLIP 0-1 and size ≤ 3 cm with AUC = 0.80 and AUC = 0.84, respectively, indicating its ability in identifying early HCC.Conclusions. A four-marker index may improve the early detection of HCC with a high degree of accuracy

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study

Background: Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling. Methods: The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty. Results: NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year. Conclusion: As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population

Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit