98 research outputs found

    Protei"enbronne in die rantsoene van groeiende varke 1. 'n vergelyking tussen vismeel en verhitte volvet sojaboonmeel

    Get PDF
    Summary: protein sources in the diets of growing pigs.1. A comparison between fish meal and heated full-fat soyabean mealTwo trials, one with porkers and one with baconers were conducted to determine the influence of heated full-fat soyabean meal as protein source on their growth, feed utilization, carcass development and fat refraction-index values. The results indicated that it is possible to substitute fish meal as protein source, on a biological base, with soyabean meal in diets with equivalent protein and energy levels.Twee proewe, een met vleis- en een met spekvarke, is uitgevoer om die invloed van verhitte volvet sojaboonmeel as proteienbron op hul groei, voeromset, karkasontwikkeling en refraksie-indekswaardes van karkasvet te bestudeer. Die resultate in die studie verkry dui daarop dat verhitte volvet sojaboonmeel wel vismeel suksesvol as proteienbron op 'n biologiese basis, in rantsoene met ekwivalente proteien- en energiepeile kan vervang

    Liver transplantation at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital

    Get PDF
    The liver transplant programme for infants and children at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital is the only established paediatric service in sub-Saharan Africa. Referrals for liver transplant assessment come from  most provinces within Smith Africa as well as neighbouring countries. Patients and methods. Since 1987, 81 children (range 6 months - 14 years) have had 84liver transplants with biliary atresia being the most frequent diagnosis. The indications for transplantation include biliary atresia (48), metabolic (7), fulminant hepatic failure (10), redo transplants (3) and other (16). Four combined liver/kidney transplants have been performed. Fifty-three were reduced-size transplants with donor/recipient weight ratios  ranging from 2:1 to 11:1 and .32 children weighed less than 10 kg.Results. Sixty patients (74%) survived 3 months -14 years post transplant. Overall cumulative 1- and 5-year patient survival figures are 79% and 70% respectively. However, with the introduction of prophylactic intravenous ganciclovir and the exclusion of hepatitis B virus (HBV) IgG core Ab-positive donors, the 1-year patient survival is 90% and the projected 5-year  paediatric survival is> 80%. Early(< 1 month) postliver- transplantmortality was low. Causes include primary malfunction (1), inferior vena cava   thrombosis (1), bleeding oesophageal ulcer (1), sepsis (1) and cerebral oedema (1). Late morbidity and mortality was mainly due to infections: de novo hepatitis B (5 patients, 2 deaths), Epstein--Barr virus (EBV)related post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (12 patients, 7 deaths) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (10 patients, 5 deaths). Tuberculosis (TB) treatment in 3 patients was complicated by chronic rejection (1) and TB-drug-induced subfulminant liver failure (1).Conclusion. Despite limited resources, a successful paediatric programme has been established with good patient and graft survival figures and excellent quality of life. Shortage of donors because of infection with HBV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to significant waiting-list mortality and infrequent transplantation

    Liver transplantation at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital

    Get PDF
    No Abstract. South African Medical Journal Vol. 96(9) (Part 2) 2006: 960-96

    "We're not short of people telling us what the problems are. We're short of people telling us what to do": An appraisal of public policy and mental health

    Get PDF
    Background: There is sustained interest in public health circles in assessing the effects of policies on health and health inequalities. We report on the theory, methods and findings of a project which involved an appraisal of current Scottish policy with respect to its potential impacts on mental health and wellbeing. Methods: We developed a method of assessing the degree of alignment between Government policies and the 'evidence base', involving: reviewing theoretical frameworks; analysis of policy documents, and nineteen in-depth interviews with policymakers which explored influences on, and barriers to cross-cutting policymaking and the use of research evidence in decisionmaking. Results: Most policy documents did not refer to mental health; however most referred indirectly to the determinants of mental health and well-being. Unsurprisingly research evidence was rarely cited; this was more common in health policy documents. The interviews highlighted the barriers to intersectoral policy making, and pointed to the relative value of qualitative and quantitative research, as well as to the imbalance of evidence between "what is known" and "what is to be done". Conclusion: Healthy public policy depends on effective intersectoral working between government departments, along with better use of research evidence to identify policy impacts. This study identified barriers to both these. We also demonstrated an approach to rapidly appraising the mental health effects of mainly non-health sector policies, drawing on theoretical understandings of mental health and its determinants, research evidence and policy documents. In the case of the social determinants of health, we conclude that an evidence-based approach to policymaking and to policy appraisal requires drawing strongly upon existing theoretical frameworks, as well as upon research evidence, but that there are significant practical barriers and disincentives

    Drinking behaviour and alcohol-related harm amongst older adults: analysis of existing UK datasets.

    Get PDF
    Older adults experience age-related physiological changes that increase sensitivity and decrease tolerance to alcohol and there are a number of age-related harms such as falls, social isolation and elder abuse, which are compounded by alcohol misuse. Despite this unique vulnerability and the fact that the number of older adults is increasing, the literature on drinking behaviour and alcohol-related harm in older adults is sparse. This article describes a secondary analysis of UK data to address this knowledge gap

    Gender and age differences among current smokers in a general population survey

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests a higher proportion of current smokers among female than among male ever smokers at the age above 50. However, little is known about the proportion of current smokers among ever smokers in old age groups with consideration of women in comparison to men from general population samples. The goal was to analyze the proportions of current smokers among female and among male ever smokers including those older than 80. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey study with a national probability household sample in Germany. Data of 179,472 participants aged 10 or older were used based on face-to-face in-home interviews or questionnaires. The proportions of current smokers among ever smokers were analyzed dependent on age, age of onset of smoking and cigarettes per day including effect modification by gender. RESULTS: Proportions of current smokers tended to be larger among female than among male ever smokers aged 40 or above. Women compared to men showed adjusted odds ratios of 1.7 to 6.9 at ages 40 to 90 or older in contrast to men. No such interaction existed for age of onset of smoking or cigarettes per day. CONCLUSION: Special emphasis should be given to current smokers among the female general population at the age of 40 or above in public health intervention

    The Use of Research Evidence in Public Health Decision Making Processes: Systematic Review

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The use of research evidence to underpin public health policy is strongly promoted. However, its implementation has not been straightforward. The objectives of this systematic review were to synthesise empirical evidence on the use of research evidence by public health decision makers in settings with universal health care systems. METHODS: To locate eligible studies, 13 bibliographic databases were screened, organisational websites were scanned, key informants were contacted and bibliographies of included studies were scrutinised. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Data were synthesised as a narrative review. FINDINGS: 18 studies were included: 15 qualitative studies, and three surveys. Their methodological quality was mixed. They were set in a range of country and decision making settings. Study participants included 1063 public health decision makers, 72 researchers, and 174 with overlapping roles. Decision making processes varied widely between settings, and were viewed differently by key players. A range of research evidence was accessed. However, there was no reliable evidence on the extent of its use. Its impact was often indirect, competing with other influences. Barriers to the use of research evidence included: decision makers' perceptions of research evidence; the gulf between researchers and decision makers; the culture of decision making; competing influences on decision making; and practical constraints. Suggested (but largely untested) ways of overcoming these barriers included: research targeted at the needs of decision makers; research clearly highlighting key messages; and capacity building. There was little evidence on the role of research evidence in decision making to reduce inequalities. CONCLUSIONS: To more effectively implement research informed public health policy, action is required by decision makers and researchers to address the barriers identified in this systematic review. There is an urgent need for evidence to support the use of research evidence to inform public health decision making to reduce inequalities

    Identifying Trustworthy Experts: How Do Policymakers Find and Assess Public Health Researchers Worth Consulting or Collaborating With?

    Get PDF
    This paper reports data from semi-structured interviews on how 26 Australian civil servants, ministers and ministerial advisors find and evaluate researchers with whom they wish to consult or collaborate. Policymakers valued researchers who had credibility across the three attributes seen as contributing to trustworthiness: competence (an exemplary academic reputation complemented by pragmatism, understanding of government processes, and effective collaboration and communication skills); integrity (independence, “authenticity”, and faithful reporting of research); and benevolence (commitment to the policy reform agenda). The emphases given to these assessment criteria appeared to be shaped in part by policymakers' roles and the type and phase of policy development in which they were engaged. Policymakers are encouraged to reassess their methods for engaging researchers and to maximise information flow and support in these relationships. Researchers who wish to influence policy are advised to develop relationships across the policy community, but also to engage in other complementary strategies for promoting research-informed policy, including the strategic use of mass media
    corecore