A Human Capital Approach to Reduce Health Disparities

Objective: To introduce a human capital approach to reduce health disparities in South Carolina by increasing the number and quality of trained minority professionals in public health practice and research. Methods: The conceptual basis and elements of Project EXPORT in South Carolina are described. Project EXPORT is a community based participatory research (CBPR) translational project designed to build human capital in public health practice and research. This project involves Claflin University (CU), a Historically Black College University (HBCU) and the African American community of Orangeburg, South Carolina to reduce health disparities, utilizing resources from the University of South Carolina (USC), a level 1 research institution to build expertise at a minority serving institution. The elements of Project EXPORT were created to advance the science base of disparities reduction, increase trained minority researchers, and engage the African American community at all stages of research. Conclusion: Building upon past collaborations between HBCU’s in South Carolina and USC, this project holds promise for a public health human capital approach to reduce health disparities

RESEARCH BRIEF: An Examination of the Social and Clinical Influences in Prostate Cancer Treatment in African American and White Men

BACKGROUND: The death rate for prostate cancer (PrCA), the most commonly diagnosed cancer in African-American (AA) men, is twice the rate of European-American (EA) men. AA men in South Carolina have the highest age-adjusted death rate in the nation. Studies have shown that treatment offered to AA men with PrCA is systematically different from that offered to EA men. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to 1,866 men in South Carolina with a diagnosis of PrCA. South Carolina men diagnosed with PrCA between 1996 and 2002 were eligible to participate. We performed a descriptive assessment of the factors that influenced PrCA treatment decisions. RESULTS: The treatment choices of AA men were significantly more likely to be influenced by pain and significantly less likely to be influenced by potential for cure compared to EA men. CONCLUSIONS: Providers must be cognizant of the factors that influence treatment, particularly in AA men. Despite the national undertaking to eliminate health disparities, the United States is far from implementing a comprehensive focus on the health of AA men, despite their elevated PrCA morbidity and mortality rates

Social and clinical predictors of prostate cancer treatment decisions among men in South Carolina

OBJECTIVE: To assess social and clinical influences of prostate cancer treatment decisions among white and black men in the Midlands of South Carolina. METHODS: We linked data collected on treatment decision making in men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1996 through 2002 with clinical and sociodemographic factors collected routinely by the South Carolina Central Cancer Registry (SCCCR). Unconditional logistic regression was used to assess social and clinical influences on treatment decision. RESULTS: A total of 435 men were evaluated. Men of both races who chose surgery (versus radiation) were more likely to be influenced by their physician and by family/friends. Black men who chose surgery also were ~5 times more likely to make independent decisions (i.e., rather than be influenced by their doctor). White men who chose surgery were twice as likely to be influenced by the desire for cure and less likely to consider the side effects of impotence (odds ratio (OR) = 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18, 0.88) and incontinence (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.63); by contrast, there was a suggestion of an opposite effect in black men, whose decision regarding surgery tended to be more strongly influenced by these side effects. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that both clinical and social predictors play an important role for men in choosing a prostate cancer treatment, but these influences may differ by race

Hispanic Student Performance on Missouri Standardized Achievement Tests

Presented to the Cambio de Colores Conference April 2, 2007 Kansas City, MO.This OSEDA presentation discusses an overview of Hispanic students in Missouri, including enrollment change, high school graduation and standardized test results

Disparities in Mental Health Utilization among Persons with Chronic Diseases

This study used Aday and Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use to examine the role of chronic disease and the joint impact of race and chronic disease type on mental health utilization. Using data from Community Tracking Survey Household Survey, we tested the assumption that chronic disease, chronic disease type, and race are related to lower rates of mental health visits when adjusted for predisposing, enabling, and need factors. After adjusting for population characteristics, we found that race significantly moderated the impact of chronic disease type on mental health utilization, showing that African Americans with cardiovascular disease were half as likely as whites with cardiovascular disease to have a mental health visit, and Hispanics relative to whites with other chronic diseases were two thirds a likely to have a mental health visit. Overall, chronic disease status was positively associated with mental health utilization. However, adjusted for chronic disease, mental health status, predisposing, enabling and need factors, African Americans and Hispanics were significantly less likely than whites to have a mental health visit. Clinicians and providers must be alert to the full spectrum of needs in underserved populations

Power of Data Analysis to Inform Improvement

Presented to the 2008 Missouri School Board Association Leadership Summit, June 6, 2008, Branson, MO.This OSEDA presentation discusses using data to inform school improvements and explores data for school board members, including an overview of OSEDA, analysis of school boards and student perceptions. (118 slides

Applying genetic algorithms to multi-objective land use planning.

This paper explores the application of multi-objective genetic algorithms (mGAs) to rural land-use planning, a spatial allocation problem. Two mGAs are proposed. Both share an underlying structure of: fitness assignment using Pareto-dominance ranking, niche induction and an individual replacement strategy. They are differentiated by their representations: a fixed-length genotype composed of genes that map directly to a land parcel's use, and a variable-length, order-dependent representation making allocations indirectly via a greedy algorithm. The latter representation requires additional breeding operators to be defined and post-processing of the genotype structure, to identify and remove duplicate genotypes. The two mGAs are compared on a real land-use planning problem, and the strengths and weaknesses of the underlying framework - and of each representation - are identified

A Human Capital Approach to Reduce Health Disparities

Objective: To introduce a human capital approach to reduce health disparities in South Carolina by increasing the number and quality of trained minority professionals in public health practice and research. Methods: The conceptual basis and elements of Project EXPORT in South Carolina are described. Project EXPORT is a community based participatory research (CBPR) translational project designed to build human capital in public health practice and research. This project involves Claflin University (CU), a Historically Black College University (HBCU) and the African American community of Orangeburg, South Carolina to reduce health disparities, utilizing resources from the University of South Carolina (USC), a level 1 research institution to build expertise at a minority serving institution. The elements of Project EXPORT were created to advance the science base of disparities reduction, increase trained minority researchers, and engage the African American community at all stages of research. Conclusion: Building upon past collaborations between HBCU\u27s in South Carolina and USC, this project holds promise for a public health human capital approach to reduce health disparities

Disparities in Mental Health Utilization among Persons with Chronic Diseases

This study used Aday and Andersen\u27s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use to examine to role of chronic disease and the joint impact of race and chronic disease type on mental health utilization. Using data from Community Tracking Survey Household Survey, we tested the assumption that chronic disease, chronic disease type, and race are related to lower rates of mental health visits when adjusted for predisposing, enabling, and need factors. After adjusting for population characteristics, we found that race significantly moderated the impact of chronic disease type on mental health utilization, showing that African Americans with cardiovascular disease were half as likely as whites with cardiovascular disease to have a mental health visit, and Hispanics relative to whites with other chronic diseases were two thirds as likely to have a mental health visit. Overall, chronic disease status was positively associated with mental health utilization. However, adjusted for chronic disease, mental health status, predisposing, enabling and need factors, African Americans and Hispanics were significantly less likely than whites to have a mental health visit. Clinicians and providers must be alert to the full spectrum of needs in underserved populations