6 research outputs found

    Cervical Symmetric Dumbbell Ganglioneuromas Causing Severe Paresis

    Get PDF
    We report an extremely rare case with bilateral and symmetric dumbbell ganglioneuromas of the cervical spine in an elderly patient. A 72-year-old man came by ambulance to our hospital due to progressive incomplete paraplegia. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated bilateral symmetric dumbbell tumors at the C1/2 level. We performed total resection of the intracanalar tumor, aiming at complete decompression of the spinal cord, and partial and subtotal resection of foraminal outside portions. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimen indicated the tumor cells to be spindle cells with the presence of ganglion cells and no cellular pleomorphism, suggesting a diagnosis of ganglioneuroma. Although the surgery was not curative, the postoperative course was uneventful and provided a satisfactory outcome. This is the fourth known case of cervical ganglioneuromas of the bilateral symmetric dumbbell type

    Energy spectrum and dose enhancement due to the depth of the Lipiodol position using flattened and unflattened beams

    Get PDF
    AimLipiodol was used for stereotactic body radiotherapy combining trans arterial chemoembolization. Lipiodol used for tumour seeking in trans arterial chemoembolization remains in stereotactic body radiation therapy. In our previous study, we reported the dose enhancement effect in Lipiodol with 10× flattening-filter-free (FFF). The objective of our study was to evaluate the dose enhancement and energy spectrum of photons and electrons due to the Lipiodol depth with flattened (FF) and FFF beams.MethodsFF and FFF for 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV beams from TrueBeam were used in this study. The Lipiodol (3[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]3[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]3[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm3) was located at depths of 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm in water. The dose enhancement factor (DEF) and the energy fluence were obtained by Monte Carlo calculations of the particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS).ResultsThe DEFs at the centre of Lipiodol with the FF beam were 6.8, 7.3, 7.6, 7.2, 6.1, and 5.7% and those with the FFF beam were 20.6, 22.0, 21.9, 20.0, 12.3, and 12.1% at depths of 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm, respectively, where Lipiodol was located in water. Moreover, spectrum results showed that more low-energy photons and electrons were present at shallow depth where Lipiodol was located in water. The variation in the low-energy spectrum due to the depth of the Lipiodol position was more explicit with the FFF beam than that with the FF beam.ConclusionsThe current study revealed variations in the DEF and energy spectrum due to the depth of the Lipiodol position with the FF and FFF beams. Although the FF beam could reduce the effect of energy dependence due to the depth of the Lipiodol position, the dose enhancement was overall small. To cause a large dose enhancement, the FFF beam with the distance of the patient surface to Lipiodol within 10[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm should be used

    Interfractional diaphragm changes during breath-holding in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver cancer

    Get PDF
    Aim and backgroundIGRT based on bone matching may produce a large target positioning error in terms of the reproducibility of expiration breath-holding on SBRT for liver cancer. We evaluated the intrafractional and interfractional errors using the diaphragm position at the end of expiration by utilising Abches and analysed the factor of the interfractional error.Materials and methodsIntrafractional and interfractional errors were measured using a couple of frontal kV images, planning computed tomography (pCT) and daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Moreover, max–min diaphragm position within daily CBCT image sets with respect to pCT and the maximum value of diaphragm position difference between CBCT and pCT were calculated.ResultsThe mean[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]SD (standard deviation) of the intra-fraction diaphragm position variation in the frontal kV images was 1.0[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.7[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]mm in the C-C direction. The inter-fractional diaphragm changes were 0.4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]4.6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]mm in the C-C direction, 1.4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]2.2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]mm in the A-P direction, and −0.6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]1.8[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]mm in the L-R direction. There were no significant differences between the maximum value of the max–min diaphragm position within daily CBCT image sets with respect to pCT and the maximum value of diaphragm position difference between CBCT and pCT.ConclusionsResidual intrafractional variability of diaphragm position is minimal, but large interfractional diaphragm changes were observed. There was a small effect in the patient condition difference between pCT and CBCT. The impact of the difference in daily breath-holds on the interfractional diaphragm position was large or the difference in daily breath-holding heavily influenced the interfractional diaphragm change
    corecore