Effect of Different Induction Immunosuppression on the Incidence of Infectious Complications after Kidney Transplantation—Single Center Study

Background/Objectives: Potent immunosuppression lowers the incidence of acute graft rejection but increases the risk of infections. In order to decrease either infectious complications or acute rejection, it is necessary to identify risk groups of patients profiting from personalized induction immunosuppressive treatment. The aim of our analysis was to find whether there were higher incidences of infectious complications after kidney transplantation (KT) in groups with different induction immunosuppressive treatment and also to find independent risk factors for recurrent infections. Materials: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with induction treatment with basiliximab after kidney transplantation from 2014 to 2019 at our center relative to age- and sex-matched controls of patients with thymoglobulin induction immunosuppression. Results: Our study consisted of two groups: basiliximab (39) and thymoglobulin (39). In the thymoglobulin group we observed an increased incidence of recurrent infection in every observed interval; however, acute rejection was seen more often in the basiliximab group. A history of respiratory diseases and thrombocytopenia were identified as independent risk factors for recurrent bacterial infections from the first to sixth month after KT. Decreased eGFR from the first month, infections caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria, and severe infections (reflected by the need for hospitalization) were identified as independent risk factors for recurrent bacterial infections from the first to the twelfth month after KT. Conclusions: We found that in the group of patients with thymoglobulin induction immunosuppressive treatment, infectious complications occurred significantly more often during the entire monitored period with decreased incidence of acute humoral and cellular rejection occurred more often

Adiponectin/Leptin Ratio as an Index to Determine Metabolic Risk in Patients after Kidney Transplantation

Background and Objectives: It has been confirmed that adiponectin/leptin (A/L) ratio correlates better with cardiometabolic risk factors than hormone levels alone. The aim of our study was to determine the risk of developing post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and other metabolic conditions depending on A/L ratio after kidney transplantation (KT). Material and Methods: In a prospective analysis, the studied samples were divided into three groups: control group, prediabetes and PTDM group. Pre-transplantation, at 3, 6 and 12 months after KT, we recorded basic characteristics of donor and recipient. We also monitored levels of adipocytokines and calculated A/L ratio. Results: During observed period, we recorded significant increase in A/L ratio in control group (p = 0.0013), on the contrary, a significant decrease in PTDM group (p = 0.0003). Using Cox regression Hazard model, we identified age at time of KT (HR 2.8226, p = 0.0225), triglycerides at 1 year (HR 3.5735, p = 0.0174) and A/L ratio < 0.5 as independent risk factors for prediabetes and PTDM 1-year post-transplant (HR 3.1724, p = 0.0114). Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the relationship between A/L and risk of PTDM and associated metabolic states after KT. We found out that A/L ratio <0.5 is independent risk factor for prediabetes and PTDM 1 year post-transplant

Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System in Patients after Kidney Transplantation—First Experience

Background: The diagnosis of graft rejection relies on the identification of donor-specific antibodies along with histological findings. Borderline changes are particularly challenging, representing non-rejection findings in up to 70% of cases. The analysis aimed to compare the results of histopathological conclusions with the findings from examination using a molecular microscope, which assesses gene expression (whole-genome microarray chip technology). Methods: Molecular microscope examination (MMDx) was applied to twelve patients (six men and six women) who underwent either indication or protocol graft biopsy. Results: The average age of patients was 46.6 years ± 4.2 (average follow-up from kidney transplantation was 6.1 months ± 1.2). MMDx examination was performed during indication biopsy in 11 patients and protocol biopsy in 1 patient. A total of 33% of the findings matched and 50% did not. Finally, we present a case of a patient with acute cellular rejection findings without clinical and laboratory correlation, where the use of MMDx significantly altered the treatment strategy. Conclusions: MMDx examination is suitable for complementing patients with ambiguous histological findings and a clinical picture not corresponding to biopsy results. The limitations of MMDx include cost and its inability to evaluate the potential recurrence of the underlying kidney disease in the graft