Impact de la culture sur la créativité (L\u27)

Ce document est le résumé en français d\u27une étude commandée par la Commission européenne, et publiée en anglais sous le titre suivant: The impact of Culture on Creativity. Cette étude explore les liens encore largement méconnus entre culture, diversité culturelle, créativité et, plus largement, innovation sociale, scientifique et économique. Au moyen d\u27exemples concrets tirés de différents secteurs et ouvrant toute l\u27Europe, cette étude illustre les synergies et effets d\u27entraînement positifs que produit la culture – par la créativité qu\u27elle génère – dans des domaines aussi variés que l\u27éducation et la formation tout au long de la vie, l\u27acceptation et l\u27utilisation par le grand public des nouvelles technologies de l\u27information et de la communication, la stimulation de la recherche, le développement de produits et services nouveaux, le positionnement des villes, le renforcement du capital social, la motivation du personnel, la modernisation des services publics etc.Ces effets d\u27entraînement sont d\u27autant plus importants que l\u27Europe – à l\u27instar d\u27autres régions du monde – est en passe de devenir une société de l\u27immatériel dont la principale matière première est la capacité à créer et à innover. L\u27étude conclut que l\u27Europe gagnerait à renforcer ce potentiel de la culture à renforcer créativité et innovation. Elle propose en conséquence des stratégies à développer à tous les niveaux de gouvernance

The entrepreneurial ecosystem of cultural and creative industries in Porto: A sub-ecosystem approach

It is still a matter of dispute whether entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) frameworks can be confined to a single industry in isolation, let alone whether such a sub-ecosystem approach can be employed in a domain that is distinct from the highgrowth industries usually scrutinised in the literature. This article seeks to apply a systemic and dynamic EE perspective to the development of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) within an urban context, with a particular focus on how urban development interacts with the sub-ecosystem of this sector over time. An in-depth case study in the city of Porto (Portugal) revealed that existing EE frameworks are well-suited to research on creative sub-ecosystems. It also enabled us to flesh out associations with other entrepreneurial activities and policy domains within the city. We highlight the prominent roles of local culture and policies when the context is resource-constrained: policy led to an upward, positive spiral that moved Porto's EE in relation to CCIs into a growth stage, during which it began to interact with, and faced resource competition from, high-tech entrepreneurship. We argue that having an integrated view of the dynamics of entrepreneurial sub-ecosystems and urban affairs can improve what is understood of productivity and causality in entrepreneurship

Cultural and creative sector representation for better policymaking

The GPN approach challenges conventional industry-based perspectives and reveals the fluid and dynamic nature of boundaries and relationships within the cultural and creative sectors (CCS). The CICERONE methodology, which incorporates linkages, flows, and networks, provides new insights for effective policymaking by uncovering meaningful connections between industries, sites, and local impacts. This raises the question of whether these flows and relationships are reflected in the influence of CCS stakeholders on policymaking. The analysis focuses on the policy ecosystem at the EU level, examining policy networks as determinants of policy outcomes and exploring the representation of interests within these networks. It highlights the fragmented engagement with CCS and the need for a coherent policy framework to address the sector's specificities and common needs. This deliverable emphasizes the importance of CCS representation in policymaking and explores two major EU policy initiatives: the establishment of a Knowledge Innovation Community (KIC) for culture and creativity and the implementation of the Resilience and Recovery Facility (RRF) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The examination of partners involved in the KIC project reveals the challenge of mobilizing CCS beyond sectoral policies, with limited representation from the industrial side of the sector. Similarly, the RRF, despite being identified as a priority for CCS, missed the opportunity for cohesive action and joint influence on EU and national strategies. The section concludes by highlighting the need for a more comprehensive and cohesive approach to CCS representation in policymaking processes. Overall, the deliverable underscores the need to reconsider CCS representation and its organization to ensure a more inclusive and impactful participation in policymaking. The fragmented engagement and lack of representation hinder a holistic understanding of CCS's contribution to various policy objectives and limit the sector's ability to address policy gaps effectively. By advocating for a coherent policy framework and collaborative action, the section emphasizes the importance of empowering CCS stakeholders and creating a platform for their meaningful involvement in shaping policies at the EU and national levels