Preschool Psychopathology Reported by Parents in 23 Societies: Testing the Seven-Syndrome Model of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5

Journal Home Register or Login: Password: Auto-Login [Reminder]Search forAdvanced Search - MEDLINE - My Recent Searches - My Saved Searches - Search TipsJOURNAL HOMECURRENT ISSUEEDICIÓN ESPAÑOLAARTICLES IN PRESSFORTHCOMING CONTENTSEARCH THIS JOURNALBROWSE ALL ISSUESCOLLECTIONSCMEPODCASTSPRESS RELEASESJOURNAL INFORMATION• Aims and Scope• Editorial Board• Author Information• Info for Advertisers• Contact Information• Permission to Reuse• Pricing InformationONLINE SUBMISSIONSSUBSCRIBE TO JOURNALCAREER OPPORTUNITIESCHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICAPSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICAABSTRACTING/INDEXINGRSS RSSMore periodicals:FIND A PERIODICALFIND A PORTALGO TO PRODUCT CATALOG Volume 49, Issue 12, Pages 1215-1224 (December 2010) View previous. 10 of 26 View next.ABSTRACTFULL TEXTFULL-TEXT PDF (474 KB)GET FULL TEXT ELSEWHERECITATION ALERTCITED BYRELATED ARTICLESEXPORT CITATIONEMAIL TO A COLLEAGUE[High-quality image available] DOWNLOAD IMAGESNEED REPRINTS?BOOKMARK ARTICLEPreschool Psychopathology Reported by Parents in 23 Societies: Testing the Seven-Syndrome Model of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5–5Masha Y. Ivanova, Ph.D.1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Thomas M. Achenbach, Ph.D.1, Leslie A. Rescorla, Ph.D.2, Valerie S. Harder, Ph.D.1, Rebecca P. Ang, Ph.D.3, Niels Bilenberg, M.D., Ph.D.4, Gudrun Bjarnadottir, Ph.D.5, Christiane Capron, Ph.D.6, Sarah S.W. De Pauw, M.A.7, Pedro Dias, Ph.D.8, Anca Dobrean, Ph.D.9, Manfred Doepfner, Ph.D.10, Michele Duyme, Ph.D.6, Valsamma Eapen, Ph.D.11, Nese Erol, Ph.D.12, Elaheh Mohammad Esmaeili, Ph.D.13, Lourdes Ezpeleta, Ph.D.14, Alessandra Frigerio, Ph.D.15, Miguel M. Gonçalves, Ph.D.16, Halldor S. Gudmundsson, M.A.17, Suh-Fang Jeng, Sc.D.18, Pranvera Jetishi, B.A.26, Roma Jusiene, Ph.D.19, Young-Ah Kim, Ph.D.20, Solvejg Kristensen, M.H.Sc.4, Felipe Lecannelier, M.A.21, Patrick W.L. Leung, Ph.D.22, Jianghong Liu, Ph.D.23, Rosario Montirosso, M.Sc.15, Kyung Ja Oh, Ph.D.24, Julia Plueck, Ph.D.10, Rolando Pomalima, M.D.25, Mimoza Shahini, M.D.27, Jaime R. Silva, Ph.D.28, Zynep Simsek, Ph.D.29, Andre Sourander, M.D.30, Jose Valverde, M.D.25, Karla G. Van Leeuwen, Ph.D.31, Bernardine S.C. Woo, M.Med.32, Yen-Tzu Wu, M.S.18, Stephen R. Zubrick, Ph.D.33, Frank C. Verhulst, M.D., Ph.D.34Accepted 28 September 2010. published online 12 November 2010.ObjectiveTo test the fit of a seven-syndrome model to ratings of preschoolers' problems by parents in very diverse societies.MethodParents of 19,106 children 18 to 71 months of age from 23 societies in Asia, Australasia, Europe, the Middle East, and South America completed the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5–5 (CBCL/1.5–5). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the seven-syndrome model separately for each society.ResultsThe primary model fit index, the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), indicated acceptable to good fit for each society. Although a six-syndrome model combining the Emotionally Reactive and Anxious/Depressed syndromes also fit the data for nine societies, it fit less well than the seven-syndrome model for seven of the nine societies. Other fit indices yielded less consistent results than the RMSEA.ConclusionsThe seven-syndrome model provides one way to capture patterns of children's problems that are manifested in ratings by parents from many societies. Clinicians working with preschoolers from these societies can thus assess and describe parents' ratings of behavioral, emotional, and social problems in terms of the seven syndromes. The results illustrate possibilities for culture–general taxonomic constructs of preschool psychopathology. Problems not captured by the CBCL/1.5–5 may form additional syndromes, and other syndrome models may also fit the data.Key Words: preschoolers, assessment, taxonomy, multicultural, confirmatory factor analysis1 University of Vermont2 Bryn Mawr College3 Nanyang Technological University4 University of Southern Denmark5 Glaesibaer Health Clinic6 University of Paris7 Ghent University8 Portugese Catholic University9 Babes-Bolyai University10 University of Cologne11 University of New South Wales12 Ankara University13 Institute for Exceptional Children14 Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona15 Scientific Institute E. Medea16 University of Minho17 University of Iceland18 National Taiwan University26 University of Dardania19 Vilnius University20 Hunoconsulting21 Universidad del Desarrollo22 Chinese University of Hong Kong23 University of Pennsylvania24 Yonsei University25 Peruvian National Institute of Mental Health27 University Clinical Center of Kosova28 Universidad de La Frontera29 Harran University30 Turku University and Turku University Hospital31 Leuven University32 Child Guidance Clinic of the Singapore Institute of Mental Health33 Curtin Centre for Developmental Research, Curtin University of Technology34 Erasmus University Medical Center-Sophia's Children's HospitalCorresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Masha Y. Ivanova, Ph.D., Vermont Center for Children, Youth and Families, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401 This article is discussed in an editorial by Dr. Alice Carter on page 1181. Disclosure: Dr. Ivanova receives research and salary support from the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, which publishes the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Dr. Achenbach is President of the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, and receives remuneration. Dr. Rescorla receives remuneration from the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families. Dr. Harder previously held a University of Vermont Postdoctoral Fellowship funding by the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families. Drs. Bjarnadottir, Gudmundsson, Leung, Verhulst, and Mr. Gudmundsson, receive research support from the sale of the CBCL. Dr. Bilenberg has received honoraria from Eli Lilly and Co., Novartis, Neuroscience, and Janseen Cilag. He has received research support from the Danish Research Foundation, the Lundbeck Foundation, Hermansens Mindelegat, and Mads Clausen Fond. Dr. Eapen has received research support from the Sheikh Hamdan Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Award for Medical Sciences. Dr. Jusiene has received research support from the Lithuanian Science and Studies Foundation. Drs. Ang, Capron, Dias, Dobrean, Doepfner, Duyme, Erol, Esmaeili, Ezpeleta, Frigerio, Gonçalves, Jeng, Kim, Liu, Oh, Plueck, Pomalima, Shahini, Silva, Simsek, Sourander, Valverde, Van Leeuwen, and Zubrick, Ms. De Pauw, Ms. Kristensen, Mr. Lecannelier, Ms. Montirosso, Ms. Jetishi, Ms. Woo, and Ms. Wu report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.PII: S0890-8567(10)00735-5doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.019© 2010 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. View previous. 10 of 26 View next. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Feedback | About Us | Help | Contact Us |The content on this site is intended for health professionals

The CBCL/1½–5’s DSM-ASD Scale: Confirmatory Factor Analyses Across 24 Societies

Previous research supports the CBCL/1½–5’s DSM-ASD scale (and its precursor, the DSM-PDP scale) as a Level 1 ASD screener. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) with data from population samples in 24 societies (N = 19,850) indicated good measurement invariance across societies, especially for configural and metric invariance. Items 4. 25, 67, 80, and 98 may be especially good discriminators of ASD because they have tend to have low base rates, strong loadings on the ASD latent construct, and the best measurement invariance across societies. Further research is needed to test the discriminative power of these items in predicting ASD, but our strong measurement findings support the international psychometric robustness of the CBCL/1½–5’s DSM-ASD scale

International Comparisons of Behavioral and Emotional Problems in Preschool Children: Parents' Reports From 24 Societies

International comparisons were conducted of preschool children's behavioral and emotional problems as reported on the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 11/2-5 by parents in 24 societies (N=19,850). Item ratings were aggregated into scores on syndromes; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-oriented scales; a Stress Problems scale; and Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems scales. Effect sizes for scale score differences among the 24 societies ranged from small to medium (3-12%). Although societies differed greatly in language, culture, and other characteristics, Total Problems scores for 18 of the 24 societies were within 7.1 points of the omnicultural mean of 33.3 (on a scale of 0-198). Gender and age differences, as well as gender and age interactions with society, were all very small (effect sizes1%). Across all pairs of societies, correlations between mean item ratings averaged .78, and correlations between internal consistency alphas for the scales averaged .92, indicating that the rank orders of mean item ratings and internal consistencies of scales were very similar across diverse societies

Syndromes of Pre-School Psychopathology Reported by Teachers and Caregivers in 14 Societies Using the Caregiver Teacher Report Form (C-TRF)

Caregivers and teachers from 14 societies rated 9,389 1.5 to 5-year-olds on the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form (C-TRF; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000). General population samples were obtained in Asia; the Middle East; Eastern, Northern, Central, Western, and Southern Europe; and South America. The 2-level 6-syndrome C-TRF model derived on a mostly U.S. sample was tested separately for each society. This model or a slightly modified 2-level 5-syndrome version of the model fit the data for 10 of the 14 societies. The findings generally support use of the C-TRF with children of diverse backgrounds. The multicultural generalizability of C-TRF syndromes suggests that they can be used as taxonomic constructs for preschoolers’ psychopathology, which can facilitate international communication and collaboration between clinicians, researchers, and educators working with young children

Challenging teachers' ideas about what students need to learn : Teachers' collaborative work in subject didactic groups

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of the processes that make teachers learn in a collaborative arrangement similar to lesson study (LS) and learning study (LearS). The teachers in this collaboration wanted to enhance teaching and student learning (grades 4-7) about decimal numbers. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on data from five teachers’ collaborative work in an adaptive arrangement of LS and LearS called subject didactic groups. Data consist of eight audio recordings of the teachers’ meetings as well as written and photographic documentation of the meetings. The analysis was carried out through the lens of expansive learning within an activity system (Engeström, 1987). This entailed a focus on contradictions between teachers’ ways of thinking and acting when individually and collaboratively developing their teaching, on the solutions to the conflicts produced by the teachers, and on how these challenged the teachers’ ideas about what the students need to learn. Findings The authors identified contradictions between formative and summative assessment, exams and stressed students, prevailing norms about teaching and the theoretical tool used for planning and analyzing lessons and student learning, and the local curriculum and time constraints. The solutions to the conflicts were the driving force for developing new and more qualitative knowledge about what the students need to learn. Originality/value This paper gives explicit examples of contradictions and solutions that can challenge and drive teachers to expand their learning in an adaptive form of LS and LearS suited to daily teaching

International comparisons of emotionally reactive problems in preschoolers: CBCL/11/2-5 findings from 21 societies

Our goal was to conduct international comparisons of emotion regulation using the 9-item Emotionally Reactive (ER) syndrome of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 11/2-5. We analyzed parent ratings for 17,964 preschoolers from 21 societies, which were grouped into 8 GLOBE study culture clusters (e.g., Nordic, Confucian Asian). Omnicultural broad base rates for ER items ranged from 8.0% to 38.8%. Rank ordering for mean item ratings varied widely across societies (omnicultural Q = .50) but less so across culture clusters (M Q = .66). Societal similarity in mean item rank ordering varied by culture cluster, with large within-cluster similarity for Anglo (Q = .96), Latin Europe (Q = .74), Germanic (Q = .77), and Latin American (Q = .76) clusters, but smaller within-cluster similarity for Nordic, Eastern Europe, and Confucian Asian clusters (Qs = .52, .23, and .44, respectively). Confirmatory factor analyses of the ER syndrome supported configural invariance for all 21 societies. All 9 items showed full to approximate metric invariance, but only 3 items showed approximate scalar invariance. The ER syndrome correlated . 65 with the Anxious/Depressed (A/D) syndrome and .63 with the Aggressive Behavior syndrome. ER items varied in base rates and factor loadings, and societies varied in rank ordering of items as low, medium, or high in mean ratings. Item rank order similarity among societies in the same culture cluster varied widely across culture clusters, suggesting the importance of cultural factors in the assessment of emotion regulation in preschoolers