46 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Selective inhibition of FLT3 by gilteritinib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, first-in-human, open-label, phase 1-2 study.
BackgroundInternal tandem duplication mutations in FLT3 are common in acute myeloid leukaemia and are associated with rapid relapse and short overall survival. The clinical benefit of FLT3 inhibitors in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia has been limited by rapid generation of resistance mutations, particularly in codon Asp835 (D835). We aimed to assess the highly selective oral FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia.MethodsIn this phase 1-2 trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with acute myeloid leukaemia who either were refractory to induction therapy or had relapsed after achieving remission with previous treatment. Patients were enrolled into one of seven dose-escalation or dose-expansion cohorts assigned to receive once-daily doses of oral gilteritinib (20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, or 450 mg). Cohort expansion was based on safety and tolerability, FLT3 inhibition in correlative assays, and antileukaemic activity. Although the presence of an FLT3 mutation was not an inclusion criterion, we required ten or more patients with locally confirmed FLT3 mutations (FLT3mut+) to be enrolled in expansion cohorts at each dose level. On the basis of emerging findings, we further expanded the 120 mg and 200 mg dose cohorts to include FLT3mut+ patients only. The primary endpoints were the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of gilteritinib. Safety and tolerability were assessed in the safety analysis set (all patients who received at least one dose of gilteritinib). Responses were assessed in the full analysis set (all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and who had at least one datapoint post-treatment). Pharmacokinetics were assessed in a subset of the safety analysis set for which sufficient data for concentrations of gilteritinib in plasma were available to enable derivation of one or more pharmacokinetic variables. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02014558, and is ongoing.FindingsBetween Oct 15, 2013, and Aug 27, 2015, 252 adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia received oral gilteritinib once daily in one of seven dose-escalation (n=23) or dose-expansion (n=229) cohorts. Gilteritinib was well tolerated; the maximum tolerated dose was established as 300 mg/day when two of three patients enrolled in the 450 mg dose-escalation cohort had two dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 diarrhoea and grade 3 elevated aspartate aminotransferase). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events irrespective of relation to treatment were febrile neutropenia (97 [39%] of 252), anaemia (61 [24%]), thrombocytopenia (33 [13%]), sepsis (28 [11%]), and pneumonia (27 [11%]). Commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (92 [37%] of 252]), anaemia (86 [34%]), fatigue (83 [33%]), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (65 [26%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase (47 [19%]). Serious adverse events occurring in 5% or more of patients were febrile neutropenia (98 [39%] of 252; five related to treatment), progressive disease (43 [17%]), sepsis (36 [14%]; two related to treatment), pneumonia (27 [11%]), acute renal failure (25 [10%]; five related to treatment), pyrexia (21 [8%]; three related to treatment), bacteraemia (14 [6%]; one related to treatment), and respiratory failure (14 [6%]). 95 people died in the safety analysis set, of which seven deaths were judged possibly or probably related to treatment (pulmonary embolism [200 mg/day], respiratory failure [120 mg/day], haemoptysis [80 mg/day], intracranial haemorrhage [20 mg/day], ventricular fibrillation [120 mg/day], septic shock [80 mg/day], and neutropenia [120 mg/day]). An exposure-related increase in inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation was noted with increasing concentrations in plasma of gilteritinib. In-vivo inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation occurred at all dose levels. At least 90% of FLT3 phosphorylation inhibition was seen by day 8 in most patients receiving a daily dose of 80 mg or higher. 100 (40%) of 249 patients in the full analysis set achieved a response, with 19 (8%) achieving complete remission, ten (4%) complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery, 46 (18%) complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery, and 25 (10%) partial remission INTERPRETATION: Gilteritinib had a favourable safety profile and showed consistent FLT3 inhibition in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. These findings confirm that FLT3 is a high-value target for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia; based on activity data, gilteritinib at 120 mg/day is being tested in phase 3 trials.FundingAstellas Pharma, National Cancer Institute (Leukemia Specialized Program of Research Excellence grant), Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro
Recommended from our members
NPM1 and FLT3-TKD mutations are enriched in patients with leukemia cutis
Leukemia cutis (LC) is a dermatologic manifestation of leukemia. Its clinical implications for the patient and the biological mechanism behind the manifestation of LC are unknown. The oncology community is increasingly utilizing mutations to classify a number of malignancies to prognosticate outcomes and to choose targeted therapies. A single-center, retrospective analysis of dermatopathology cases with a diagnosis of leukemia cutis was performed. Patients with genetic testing using the Columbia Combined Cancer Panel (a targeted sequencing protocol of 467 genes) or Genoptix (targeted sequencing protocol of 44 genes) were identified. The frequency of the presence of genetic mutations in LC patients was compared to AML patients from the COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database. Twenty nine cases were confirmed to have leukemia cutis, 22 of which had acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Genetic testing was available in 11 patients. Twelve different mutations were observed with particular enrichment for NPM1 and FLT3-TKD. Our original hypothesis was that patients with LC would display a distinct mutation profile. Ultimately, the distribution of mutations observed in our cohort of LC patients largely reflects the mutational profile seen in AML patients in general
Recommended from our members
Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease detection and PML/RAR-α isoform type: long-term follow-up in acute promyelocytic leukemia
Abstract The t(15;17) translocation in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) yields a PML/RAR-α fusion messenger RNA species that can be detected by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification. Breakpoints within intron 3 of PML produce a short PML/RAR-α isoform, whereas breakpoints within intron 6 result in a longer form. Using RT-PCR, serial evaluations were performed on the bone marrow of 82 patients with APL (median follow-up, > 63 months) who received retinoic acid (RA) induction followed by postremission treatment with chemotherapy, RA, and biologic agents. Sixty-four patients attained a clinical complete remission and had at least 2 RT-PCR assays performed after completing therapy. Forty of 47 patients (85%) with newly diagnosed APL who were induced using RA had residual disease detectable by RT-PCR before additional therapy. After 3 cycles of consolidation therapy, residual disease was found in only 4 of 40 evaluable patients (10%). Among newly diagnosed patients who had 2 or more negative RT-PCR assays, only 3 of 41 (7%) had a relapse, whereas all 4 patients (100%) who had 2 or more positive results had a relapse. Among 63 newly diagnosed patients, those who expressed the short isoform appeared to have shorter disease-free and overall survival durations than patients who expressed the long isoform. These data indicate that 2 or more negative RT-PCR assays on bone marrow, performed at least 1 month apart after completing therapy, are strongly associated with long-term remissions. Conversely, a confirmed positive test is highly predictive of relapse
Randomized, phase IIb study of low-dose cytarabine and lintuzumab versus low-dose cytarabine and placebo in older adults with untreated acute myeloid leukemia
Improving outcomes in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remains a formidable challenge. Lintuzumab (SGN-33; HuM195) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD33, which is expressed on the majority of myeloblasts in acute myeloid leukemia. The primary objective of this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was to determine whether addition of lintuzumab to low-dose cytarabine would increase overall survival in adults aged 60 years and over with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Randomization was stratified by age, previous hematologic disorder, and performance status. All patients received cytarabine (20 mg subcutaneously twice daily) on Days 1-10 of each 28-day cycle. Patients received lintuzumab (600 mg) or placebo intravenously once weekly in Cycle 1 and once every other week in Cycles 2-12. A total of 211 patients (107 lintuzumab, 104 placebo) were randomized. Median age was 70 years (range 60-90). Survival was not significantly prolonged with lintuzumab treatment (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.28; P=0.7585). Median survival was similar between treatment arms (4.7 months lintuzumab vs. 5.1 months placebo) and in the subgroup of patients with high-risk cytogenetics (4.5 months). Infusion-related reactions, predominantly Grades 1-2, occurred more commonly in the lintuzumab arm (51% vs. 7% placebo); no other clinically significant difference in safety was noted. These results confirm that lintuzumab in combination with low-dose cytarabine did not prolong survival and that low-dose cytarabine remains a valid comparator for trials of non-intensive therapies in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia, regardless of cytogenetic profile
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Randomized, phase IIb study of low-dose cytarabine and lintuzumab versus low-dose cytarabine and placebo in older adults with untreated acute myeloid leukemia
Improving outcomes in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remains a formidable challenge. Lintuzumab (SGN-33; HuM195) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD33, which is expressed on the majority of myeloblasts in acute myeloid leukemia. The primary objective of this randomized, double-blinded, placebocontrolled trial was to determine whether addition of lintuzumab to low-dose cytarabine would increase overall survival in adults aged 60 years and over with untreated acute myeloid leukemia
Recommended from our members
Lintuzumab and Low-Dose Cytarabine Compared to Placebo and Low-Dose Cytarabine in Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) 60 Years and Older: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Phase 2b Study
Abstract
Abstract 3613
Background:
Older adults with AML who decline intensive induction chemotherapy lack effective therapeutic options, as evidenced by a median overall survival (OS) of ∼5 months with low-dose cytarabine treatment (Burnett 2007). Leukemic blast cells express CD33 in most patients with AML. While antitumor activity has been previously demonstrated by CD33-directed agents, none of these are currently available. Lintuzumab (SGN-33) is a humanized antibody directed to CD33 that was studied in patients with myeloid malignancies and demonstrated tolerability with modest monotherapy activity. To determine if the addition of lintuzumab to low-dose cytarabine could prolong survival in older patients with untreated AML, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded phase 2b study was conducted (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00528333).
Methods:
The study was conducted at 72 international sites between November 2007 and August 2010. Patients were >60 years of age with centrally confirmed, previously untreated AML; the minimum blast percentage required was 20% with ≥50% CD33 expression. Maximum allowed WBC at baseline was 30,000/μL. All patients declined treatment with intensive induction chemotherapy. Cytarabine 20 mg was administered SC twice daily on Days 1–10 of each 28-day cycle (12 cycles maximum). Patients were randomized to additionally receive either lintuzumab 600 mg or placebo IV: in Cycle 1 on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22, and on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles. Patients were stratified according to age, ECOG performance status (PS), and history of antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD). Cytogenetic risk was determined at baseline according to Fröling 2006. The primary endpoint of the study was OS, determined using an unstratified log rank test. Secondary endpoints included peripheral blood count recovery, transfusion requirements, infection rates, and quality of life. As patients choosing less-intensive therapy often incorporate quality of life into their treatment decision, follow-up bone marrow biopsies were not required in the study.
Results:
211 patients were randomized in the study (107 lintuzumab arm, 104 placebo arm). The study arms appeared balanced; overall, the median patient age was 70 years (range 60–90), 53% were female, and baseline ECOG PS was 0/1 (55%) or 2 (45%). Baseline blast percentages were ≥30% in 74% of patients and 23% had a history of AHD. A median of 95% CD33 expression was documented at baseline in either bone marrow or peripheral blood. Median number of treatment cycles was 4 in the lintuzumab arm and 3 in the placebo arm. At the time of the analysis, 24 patients were alive and the maximum follow-up was 32 months. The estimated median OS for the lintuzumab + low-dose cytarabine arm was 4.7 months compared with 5.1 months for the placebo + low-dose cytarabine arm with a hazard ratio (lintuzumab to placebo) of 0.96, indicating that lintuzumab was not associated with a treatment effect (P value 0.76, 95% CI [0.72, 1.28]). Rates of infections or fevers of unknown origin requiring hospitalization or IV antibiotics did not differ between the study arms. Overall, 28% of patients were observed to have no peripheral blasts, ANC >1.0 x109/L, platelets >100 × 109/L, and no transfusions for at least 1 week. The median OS among all patients was 5.0 months, which was significantly impacted by cytogenetic risk (8.7 months for standard-risk compared with 4.5 months for high-risk; P value 0.0024). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the treatment groups, with the exception of infusion-related reactions which occurred more frequently in the lintuzumab arm. The most common ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic AEs in the study were pneumonia (12%) and sepsis (8%).
Conclusions:
In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded phase 2b trial, the combination of lintuzumab and low-dose cytarabine did not improve OS compared with placebo and low-dose cytarabine. While lintuzumab was not effective, CD33 remains a compelling target for AML because it is widely expressed by malignant cells and appears to be absent from pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells. This was the largest study to date of patients treated with low-dose cytarabine; the median OS across both treatment arms was 5 months. A similar outcome was observed in the subgroup of patients with high-risk cytogenetics, confirming that low-dose cytarabine remains a valid comparator in trials of older patients with AML.
Disclosures:
Lancet: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lintuzumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody directed against CD33. Sekeres:Celgene Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corp.: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wood:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Grove:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Equity Ownership; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Sandalic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Equity Ownership; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Sievers:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jurcic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding
Recommended from our members
Phase 2 Study of Decitabine in Combination with Tretinoin in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: Interim Results
Abstract
Abstract 3815
Background:
The activity of DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNMTI) monotherapy is suboptimal for most patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). DNMTI combinations studied to date have not convincingly produced higher response rates compared to DNMTI monotherapy, although time to response appears to be improved in some studies. We combined decitabine (DAC) with tretinoin (ATRA), an RAR ligand which can recruit histone acetyltransferases to gene regulatory regions, as a means to upregulate gene expression, and to induce apoptosis or differentiation, as is seen in in vitro studies of non-M3 AML. Our previous phase 1 study established 65 mg/m2/day of ATRA as the MTD (headache was DLT at 85 mg/m2/d) when given on days 10–19 following standard dose decitabine (20 mg/m2/d), given on days 1–5 of a 28-day cycle (Klimek VM, et al. Leuk Res, 2011;35:S70-S).
Materials and Methods:
MDS pts with any FAB or WHO subtype were enrolled if they had an IPSS score ≥ 0.5, were ineligible for allogeneic stem cell transplant (AlloSCT) at study entry, and had adequate hepatic and renal function. Prior DAC or 5-azacytidine (5-aza) responders who then progressed off treatment, and pts whose MDS progressed on 5-aza were eligible. Pts received up to 10 cycles of DAC (given on days 1–5) and tretinoin (65 mg/m2/d on days 10–19 of a 28-day cycle), allowing for delays due to infection or to allow count recovery as deemed necessary by the treating physician. Those with an ongoing response after 10 cycles continued DAC alone off-study. The primary endpoint is efficacy, assessed after even-numbered cycles using the 2006 Modified International Working Group MDS response criteria. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate duration of best response due to the censoring for patients undergoing AlloSCT.
Results:
36 eligible pts (27M, 9F; median age 66, range 45–84 yrs) were enrolled in the phase 2 cohort as of 6/2012. FAB/WHO subtypes included: RA/RCMD, n=3 (8%); RARS/RCMD-RARS, n=1 (3%); RAEB/RAEB-1 & 2, n= 24 (67%); RAEBt/AML, n= 6 (17%); CMML/CMML-1, n=2 (6%). IPSS risk categories included: Int-1, n=5 (14%); Int-2, n=16 (44%); High Risk, n=11 (31%), and pts with ≥ Int-1 (n=3) or ≥ Int-2 (n=1) risk disease who could not be definitively classified using the IPSS. Most pts (n=20) had IPSS poor risk cytogenetics (CG), 11 had IPSS good risk CG (all with normal karyotype), 3 had intermediate risk CG, and CG results were unknown in 2 pts. 15/36 (42%) had therapy-related disease (t-MDS/AML), all with IPSS poor risk CG and either IPSS Int-2 (n=9) or High Risk (n=6) disease. Marrow blasts were ≥ 5% in 26/36 pts: (5–10%, n=13; 11–20%, n=13; 21–30%, n=6). Prior MDS therapy included lenalidomide (n=2), thalidomide (n=1), 5-aza (n=3), DAC (n=1), and lintuzumab (n=1). Pts received a median of 4 cycles of therapy (range, 1–10), and started therapy 0.6–180 months (median, 1.42 months) from the time of diagnosis. Two pts were classified as treatment failures since they died during the first cycle of therapy. One pt with CMML-1 at baseline progressed to AML during the screening period, and was deemed ineligible. Two pts on study have not yet had a full response assessment. Best responses in the evaluable intent to treat cohort (n=33) include: CR, n=7 (21%); PR, n=1 (3%); mCR, n=3 (9%); mCR+HI, n=3 (9 %); HI alone, n=3 (9 %); Stable disease, n=10 (30%); Disease progression, n= 3 (9%). The composite CR rate (CR+mCR±HI) was 39% (13/33), and the overall response rate (CR+PR+mCR±HI+HI) is 51% (17/33). Median time from diagnosis to start of therapy for responders was 1.7 months (range, 0.8–180). The ORR for the 13 t-MDS/AML pts was 46% (6/13), including 5 pts with monosomy 17 and/or p53 loss by FISH. The median time to initial response and best response is 1.1 months and 2.3 months, respectively. The median response duration is 7.8 months, incorporating the 7 pts censored at the time they came off study to undergo AlloSCT.
Conclusions:
DAC/ATRA is active in IPSS Int-2 and High Risk MDS and in t-MDS/AML, which is characterized by poor risk cytogenetics and an increased frequency of p53 or chromosome 17p loss. Although our interim ORR appears similar to DAC and 5-aza monotherapy trials, our results were achieved in a higher risk cohort, and the CR rate is equal to or greater than some earlier monotherapy studies with a shorter median time to response. Ongoing and planned correlative studies may define pre-treatment biomarkers for response.
Disclosures:
Off Label Use: Tretinoin