Literature-based considerations regarding organizing and performing cardiac surgery against the backdrop of the coronavirus pandemic

Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic presents challenges for surgeons of all disciplines, including cardiologists. The volume of cardiac surgery cases has to comply with the mandatory constraints of healthcare capacities. The treatment of Covid-19-positive patients must also be considered. Unfortunately, no scientific evidence is available on this issue. Therefore, this study aimed to offer some consensus-based considerations, derived from available scientific papers, regarding the organization and performance of cardiac surgery against the backdrop of the Covid-19 pandemic. Methods Key recommendations were extracted from recent literature concerning cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Reducing elective cardiac procedures should be based on frequent clinical assessment of patients on the waiting list (every one or two weeks) and the current local status of the Covid-19 pandemic. Screening tests at admission for every patient are broadly recommended. Where appropriate, alternative treatment methods can be considered, including percutaneous techniques and minimally invasive surgery, if performed by experienced cardiac surgery teams. Conclusions There is little evidence on the strategies to organize cardiac surgery in the Covid-19 pandemic. Most authors agree on reducing elective operations based on patients' clinical condition and the status of the Covid-19 pandemic. Admission screenings and the use of percutaneous or minimally invasive approaches should be preferred to reduce in-hospital stays

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Current evidence and challenges

In 1987 Nikolay Volodos performed the world’s first endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms. Endovascular technology has progressed significantly since then. There are now many thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) systems commercially available. By applying them, we can treat many pathologies: aneurysms, dissections, aortic ruptures, and penetrating aortic ulcers. However, TEVAR technology still has its limitations, namely the risk of a retrograde type A dissection, the issue of precise landing in the distal landing zone, and the risk of air embolism and paraplegia. Furthermore, there are no appropriate stent grafts widely available to treat acute dissections. Those currently used are designed for aneurysms, not for dissections. As a result, there are several challenges facing the future TEVAR surgical community, such as the need to develop new and more precise systems with retrograde deployment for the distal landing zone, as well as to introduce flexible stent grafts to treat dissections. The endo-Bentall is being developed as an alternative treatment method for acute type-A aortic dissection

The influence of gender on mortality in patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine if gender affects mortality in patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 286 consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR at our institution during a 12-year period (female 29%, median age 69 years). Chronic health conditions, risk factors, as well as early and long-term outcome were assessed. Follow-up data were available in all patients. Results: For female gender, 1-year survival and 5-year survival was 84% and 56% versus 83% and 60% for male gender. No significant gender influence was observed (odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-1.56). Furthermore, no significant gender influence could be observed according to the individual indication - atherosclerotic aneurysms (OR 0.78 95%CI 0.41-1.47), acute type B dissections (OR 0.78 95%CI 0.21-2.83), penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers/intramural hematoma (OR 1.48 95%CI 0.53-4.19), and traumatic aortic lesions (OR 1.48 95%CI 0.53-4.19). Age (OR 3.6 95%CI 1.24-10.45) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; OR 3.09 95%CI 0.98-9.73) were independent predictors of mortality in females. Conclusions: Gender does not affect mortality in patients after TEVAR irrespective of the underlying indication, atherosclerotic aneurysms, acute type B dissections, penetrating ulcers/intramural hematoma, and traumatic aortic lesions. Classical risk factors such as age and the presence of COPD at the time of TEVAR remain the most important risk factors in female

Effect on false-lumen status of a combined vascular and endovascular approach for the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to evaluate midterm results with regard to false-lumen status of a combined vascular and endovascular approach for the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS We performed ascending/hemiarch replacement during hypothermic circulatory arrest with additional open implantation of the Djumbodis Dissection System (non-self-expanding bare metal stent) to readapt the dissected layers in the arch and the proximal descending aorta in a consecutive series of 15 patients (mean age 61 years, 20% female) suffering from acute type A aortic dissections. The primary end point was the status of the false lumen at the level of the stent. RESULTS We observed three in-hospital deaths (20%). Complete thrombosis of the false lumen was observed in one patient (8%). In 25% of patients, partial thrombosis of the false lumen was observed. The remaining patients had continuing antegrade perfusion. Surgical conversion during a mean follow-up of 37 months was required in two patients (16%) due to continuing enlargement of the distal arch and the proximal descending aorta. No late deaths were observed. CONCLUSION Additional implantation of the Djumbodis Dissection System to readapt the dissected layers in the arch and the proximal descending aorta does not seem to have additive value as an adjunct to standard ascending/hemiarch replacement with regard to closure of the false lumen in the arch and the proximal descending aorta. The most limiting factor seems to be the non-self-expanding capability of the devic

The influence of bicuspid aortic valves on the dynamic pressure distribution in the ascending aorta: a porcine ex vivo model †

OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to simulate the effect of different bicuspid aortic valve configurations on the dynamic pressure distribution in the ascending aorta. METHODS Aortic specimens were harvested from adult domestic pigs. In Group 1, bicuspidalization was created by a running suture between the left and the right coronary leaflets (n = 6) and in Group 2 by a running suture between the left and the non-coronary leaflets (n = 6). Eleven tricuspid specimens served as controls. Two intraluminal pressure catheters were positioned at the concavity and the convexity of the ascending aorta. The specimens were connected to a mock circulation (heart rate: 60 bpm, target pressure: 95 mmHg). A comparison of the different conditions was also done in a numerical simulation. RESULTS At a distal mean aortic pressure of 94 ± 10 mmHg, a mean flow rate of 5.2 ± 0.3 l/min was achieved. The difference of maximal dynamic pressure values (which occurred in systole) between locations at the convexity and the concavity was 7.8 ± 2.9 mmHg for the bicuspid and 1.0 ± 0.9 mmHg for the tricuspid specimens (P < 0.001). The numerical simulation revealed an even higher pressure difference between convexity and concavity for bicuspid formation. CONCLUSIONS In this hydrodynamic mock circulation model, we were able to demonstrate that bicuspid aortic valves are associated with significant pressure differences in different locations within the ascending aorta compared with tricuspid aortic valves. These altered pressure distributions and flow patterns may further add to the understanding of aneurismal development in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and might serve to anticipate adverse aortic events due to a better knowledge of the underlying mechanism

Validation of a new prognostic model to predict short and medium-term survival in patients with liver cirrhosis

Background: MELD score and MELD score derivates are used to objectify and grade the risk of liver-related death in patients with liver cirrhosis. We recently proposed a new predictive model that combines serum creatinine levels and maximum liver function capacity (LiMAx®), namely the CreLiMAx risk score. In this validation study we have aimed to reproduce its diagnostic accuracy in patients with end-stage liver disease. Methods: Liver function of 113 patients with liver cirrhosis was prospectively investigated. Primary end-point of the study was liver-related death within 12 months of follow-up. Results: Alcoholic liver disease was the main cause of liver disease (n = 51; 45%). Within 12 months of follow-up 11 patients (9.7%) underwent liver transplantation and 17 (15.1%) died (13 deaths were related to liver disease, two not). Measures of diagnostic accuracy were comparable for MELD, MELD-Na and the CreLiMAx risk score as to power in predicting short and medium-term mortality risk in the overall cohort: AUROCS for liver related risk of death were for MELD [6 months 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.98) p < 0.001; 12 months 0.89 (95% CI 0.81–0.96) p < 0.001]; MELD-Na [6 months 0.93 (95% CI 0.85–1.00) p < 0.001 and 12 months 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.98) p < 0.001]; CPS 6 months 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.97) p < 0.01 and 12 months 0.88 (95% CI 0.80–0.96) p < 0.001] and CreLiMAx score [6 months 0.80 (95% CI 0.67–0.96) p < 0.01 and 12 months 0.79 (95% CI 0.64–0.94) p = 0.001]. In a subgroup analysis of patients with Child-Pugh Class B cirrhosis, the CreLiMAx risk score remained the only parameter significantly differing in non-survivors and survivors. Furthermore, in these patients the proposed score had a good predictive performance. Conclusion: The CreLiMAx risk score appears to be a competitive and valid tool for estimating not only short- but also medium-term survival of patients with end-stage liver disease. Particularly in patients with Child-Pugh Class B cirrhosis the new score showed a good ability to identify patients not at risk of death

Prevalence and management of driveline infections in mechanical circulatory support - a single center analysis

Background: Driveline infections in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (cf-LVAD) remain the most common adverse event. This single-center retrospective study investigated the risk factors, prevalence and management of driveline infections. :Methods Patients treated after cf-LVAD implantation from December 2014 to January 2020 were enrolled. Baseline data were collected and potential risk factors were elaborated. The multi-modal treatment was based on antibiotic therapy, daily wound care, surgical driveline reposition, and heart transplantation. Time of infection development, freedom of reinfection, freedom of heart transplantation, and death in the follow-up time were investigated. Results: Of 75 observed patients, 26 (34.7%) developed a driveline infection. The mean time from implantation to infection diagnosis was 463 (+/- 399; range, 35-1400) days. The most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 15, 60%). First-line therapy was based on antibiotics, with a primary success rate of 27%. The majority of patients (n = 19; 73.1%) were treated with surgical reposition after initial antibiotic therapy. During the follow-up time of 569 (+/- 506; range 32-2093) days, the reinfection freedom after surgical transposition was 57.9%. Heart transplantation was performed in eight patients due to resistant infection. The overall mortality for driveline infection was 11.5%. Conclusions: Driveline infections are frequent in patients with implanted cf-LVAD, and treatment does not efficiently avoid reinfection, leading to moderate mortality rates. Only about a quarter of the infected patients were cured with antibiotics alone. Surgical driveline reposition is a reasonable treatment option and does not preclude subsequent heart transplantation due to limited reinfection freedom

1. Aparatura badaniowa ABUS-AB systemu automatyzacji badań sieci strefowych "ABUS". 2. Rejestrator kodu MFC-R2 typu "RSK". 3. Cyfrowy odbiornik kodów wieloczęstotliwościowych R2. Referaty Problemowe, 1990, zeszyt 100

W artykułach przedstawiono: budowę aparatury przeznaczonej do automatycznych badań sieci strefowych ABUS-AB (1), budowę rejestratora kodu MFC-R2 typu RSK (2) oraz metodę przetwarzania sygnałów kodu R2 w oparciu o dyskretną transformatę Fouriera, zastosowaną w cyfrowych odbiornikach tych urządzeń (3) - opracowane w Zakładzie Miernictwa i Automatyzacji Badań Z-2 Instytutu Łączności

Thoracic Surgery in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Novel Approach to Reach Guideline Consensus

The COVID-19 pandemic challenges international and national healthcare systems. In the field of thoracic surgery, procedures may be deferred due to mandatory constraints of the access to diagnostics, staff and follow-up facilities. There is a lack of prospective data on the management of benign and malignant thoracic conditions in the pandemic. Therefore, we derived recommendations from 14 thoracic societies to address key questions on the topic of COVID-19 in the field of thoracic surgery. Respective recommendations were extracted and the degree of consensus among different organizations was calculated. A high degree of consensus was found to temporarily suspend non-critical elective procedures or procedures for benign conditions and to prioritize patients with symptomatic or advanced cancer. Prior to hospitalization, patients should be screened for respiratory symptoms indicating possible COVID-19 infection and most societies recommended to screen all patients for COVID-19 prior to admission. There was a weak consensus on the usage of serology tests and CT scans for COVID-19 diagnostics. Nearly all societies suggested to postpone elective procedures in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and recommended constant reevaluation of these patients. Additionally, we summarized recommendations focusing on precautions in the theater and the management of chest drains. This study provides a novel approach to informed guidance for thoracic surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic in the absence of scientific evidence-based data