Cryopreservation time does not decrease follicular viability in ovarian tissue frozen for fertility preservation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of storage duration on cryopreserved ovarian tissue using fresh and frozenthawed samples. METHODS: Seventeen fertile patients underwent an ovarian biopsy during elective laparoscopic tubal ligation. The tissue sample was divided into three parts: one part was processed fresh (FG), and two were slowly frozen, cryopreserved for 30 (G30) or 180 days (G180), thawed and analyzed. Follicular density, follicular viability, and steroidogenic capacity were assessed. RESULTS: We observed no differences between the groups in follicular density, which was assessed in hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections. A heterogeneous follicular distribution was observed in the parenchyma, with a mean density of 361.3±255.4, 454.9±676.3, and 296.8±269.0 follicles/mm3 for FG, G30 and G180, respectively (p = 0.46). Follicular viability was greater in FG (93.4%) when compared with the cryopreserved tissues (70.8% for G30 (p<0.001) and 78.4% for G180 (p<0.001)), with no difference in viability between the frozen samples (p>0.05). The steroidogenic capacity of the tissue was not significantly reduced following cryopreservation. CONCLUSION: The slow freezing procedures used for ovarian cryopreservation are capable of preserving follicular viability and maintaining the steroidogenic capacity of the tissue despite a roughly 30% decrease in follicular viability. Furthermore, short-term storage of ovarian tissue does not appear to compromise follicle integrity

Macroprolactinemia and intermediate hyperprolactinemia: clinical manifestations and image

OBJETIVOS: Caracterizar as pacientes com valores indeterminados de hiperprolactinemia (teste de PEG para identificação de macroprolactinemias com recuperação entre 30 e 65%) (PRLi) ou macroprolactinemia (PRLm), quanto às características clínicas, como intensidade e variação dos sintomas e presença ou não de tumores no sistema nervoso central. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, retrospectivo, de levantamento de prontuários, no qual foram incluídas 24 pacientes com diagnóstico de hiperprolactinemia (PRL>25 ng/dL), em idade reprodutiva, em seguimento em ambulatório de ginecologia endócrina. Foram incluídas 11 pacientes com PRLm e 13 com PRLi. Dos dois grupos (PRLm e PRLi), foram considerados para a análise registros dos dados relativos à idade, à paridade, ao índice de massa corporal, à presença de galactorreia, à infertilidade e ao tumor do sistema nervoso central. Os dados antropométricos foram expressos em média e desvio padrão e, para a comparação entre os grupos quanto à presença de tumor no sistema nervoso central, galactorreia e infertilidade, utilizou-se o teste t de Student. RESULTADOS: A galactorreia foi mais prevalente nas pacientes com PRLi (p=0,01). Setenta por cento das mulheres com PRLi apresentaram microprolactinoma de hipófise, enquanto que este achado foi evidente em 17% das mulheres com PRLm (p=0,04). Dentre as pacientes com PRLm e PRLi, nove não foram investigadas com imagem do sistema nervoso central por apresentarem níveis pouco elevados de prolactina (cinco portadoras de PRLm e quatro de PRLi). Não houve diferença significativa quanto à ocorrência de infertilidade ou de ciclos menstruais irregulares. CONCLUSÕES: Mulheres com hiperprolactinemia intermediária apresentam mais sintomas de galactorreia e maior incidência de tumores do sistema nervoso central do que aquelas com macroprolactinemia

Evaluation of embolization for periuterine varices involving chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic congestion syndrome

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical response and success rate after periuterine varices embolization in patients with chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic congestion syndrome and to report the safety of endovascular treatment and its rate of complications. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of patients undergoing endovascular treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome in our department from January 2012 to November 2015. Data were analyzed based on patient background, imaging findings, embolized veins, rate of complications, and clinical response as indicated by the visual analog pain scale. RESULTS: We performed periuterine varices embolization in 22 patients during the study, four of which required a second embolization. Seventeen patients reported a reduction in pelvic pain after the first embolization and three patients reported a reduction in pelvic pain after the second embolization. Minor complications were observed in our patients, such as postural hypotension, postoperative pain, and venous perforation during the procedure, without clinical repercussion. CONCLUSION: Periuterine varices embolization in patients with chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic congestion syndrome appears to be an effective and safe technique

Pain pressure threshold algometry of the abdominal wall in healthy women

The objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of pain pressure threshold algometry at various points of the abdominal wall of healthy women. Twenty-one healthy women in menacme with a mean age of 28 +/- 5.4 years (range: 19-39 years) were included. All volunteers had regular menstrual cycles (27-33 days) and were right-handed and, to the best of our knowledge, none were taking medications at the time of testing. Women with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety or other mood disturbances were excluded. Women with previous abdominal surgery, any pain condition or any evidence of inflammation, hypertension, smoking, alcoholism, or inflammatory disease were also excluded. Pain perception thresholds were assessed with a pressure algometer with digital traction and compression and a measuring capacity for 5 kg. All points were localized by palpation and marked with a felt-tipped pen and each individual was evaluated over a period of 2 days in two consecutive sessions, each session consisting of a set of 14 point measurements repeated twice by two examiners in random sequence. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean pain threshold obtained by the two examiners on 2 diferent days (examiner A: P = 1.00; examiner B: P = 0.75; Wilcoxon matched pairs test). There was excellent/good agreement between examiners for all days and all points. Our results have established baseline values to which future researchers will be able to refer. They show that pressure algometry is a reliable measure for pain perception in the abdominal wall of healthy women