Telomere Formation Systems in Budding and Fission Yeasts

Telomeres are specialized structures essential for genomic stability in eukaryotic cells. Inducible systems causing telomere shortening or telomere formation from short tracts of telomere repeats were developed in the late 1990s in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and have been adapted to investigate multiple aspects of telomere biology. In the formation system, an internal tract of telomere repeats is placed next to an inducible double-strand break. Inducing the break converts the telomere tract into a functional telomere whose fate can be followed kinetically and allows one to assay elongation, protein recruitment, and the DNA damage checkpoint activation. This work was extended to Schizosaccharomyces pombe, as it shares some features of telomeric chromatin with mammalian cells that are missing in S. cerevisiae. The S. pombe system has revealed novel aspects of telomeric chromatin formation and similarities with S. cerevisiae. This chapter will review these past discoveries in different yeast model organisms, and what they reveal about telomere physiology that may well be conserved in mammals

The inhibition of checkpoint activation by telomeres does not involve exclusion of dimethylation of histone H4 lysine 20 (H4K20me2) [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 not approved]

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) activate the DNA damage checkpoint machinery to pause or halt the cell cycle.  Telomeres, the specific DNA-protein complexes at linear eukaryotic chromosome ends, are capped DSBs that do not activate DNA damage checkpoints.  This “checkpoint privileged” status of telomeres was previously investigated in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombelacking the major double-stranded telomere DNA binding protein Taz1. Telomeric DNA repeats in cells lacking Taz1 are 10 times longer than normal and contain single-stranded DNA regions. DNA damage checkpoint proteins associate with these damaged telomeres, but the DNA damage checkpoint is not activated. This severing of the DNA damage checkpoint signaling pathway was reported to stem from exclusion of histone H4 lysine 20 dimethylation (H4K20me2) from telomeric nucleosomes in both wild type cells and cells lacking Taz1.  However, experiments to identify the mechanism of this exclusion failed, prompting our re-evaluation of H4K20me2 levels at telomeric chromatin.  In this short report, we used an extensive series of controls to identify an antibody specific for the H4K20me2 modification and show that the level of this modification is the same at telomeres and internal loci in both wild type cells and those lacking Taz1.  Consequently, telomeres must block activation of the DNA Damage Response by another mechanism that remains to be determined

DMTs and Covid-19 severity in MS: a pooled analysis from Italy and France

We evaluated the effect of DMTs on Covid-19 severity in patients with MS, with a pooled-analysis of two large cohorts from Italy and France. The association of baseline characteristics and DMTs with Covid-19 severity was assessed by multivariate ordinal-logistic models and pooled by a fixed-effect meta-analysis. 1066 patients with MS from Italy and 721 from France were included. In the multivariate model, anti-CD20 therapies were significantly associated (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.39–3.02, p < 0.001) with Covid-19 severity, whereas interferon indicated a decreased risk (OR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.18–0.99, p = 0.047). This pooled-analysis confirms an increased risk of severe Covid-19 in patients on anti-CD20 therapies and supports the protective role of interferon

Replication and maintenance of telomeres : Role of RPA to prevent or resolve secondary structures like G-quadruplexes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Les télomères sont des structures nucléoprotéiques protégeant l’extrémité des chromosomes de la dégradation et assurant la réplication de l’ADN terminal. En effet, de nombreuses protéines de réplication sont impliquées dans le maintien de ces structures, comme le complexe RPA (Replication Protein A). Ce complexe très conservé chez les eucaryotes se fixe à l’ADN simple brin et est impliqué dans la réplication, les mécanismes de recombinaison et la réparation de l’ADN. Chez S.pombe, la mutation ponctuelle de la sous-unité RPA1 (Rpa1-D223Y) provoque le raccourcissement des télomères. Dans cette étude, nous montrons que cette mutation provoque l’accumulation de structures aberrantes de haut poids moléculaire aux télomères corrélant avec une présence persistante de Polα aux télomères suggérant une accumulation de structures sur le brin riche en G. Nous avons pu mettre en évidence que la surexpression d’hélicases de la famille Pif1 incluant S.cerevisiae Pif1 et PIF1 humain ainsi que Pfh1 (S.pombe) sont capable de restaurer une longueur de télomères sauvage dans mutant rpa1-D223Y. Ces résultats suggèrent que RPA pourrait empêcher l’accumulation de G4 au niveau du brin retardé télomérique afin de faciliter l’élongation des télomères par la télomérase. De plus, des expériences in vitro ont montré que la mutation correspondante de RPA1 humain réduisait spécifiquement l’affinité de RPA pour le simple brin télomérique humain dans les conditions ou il forme des G4.Enfin l’étude de la stabilité de séquences répétées formant des G4 (minisatellite CEB25), chez S.pombe, a permis de renforcer l’hypothèse selon laquelle RPA pourrait empêcher la formation ou aiderait à la résolution de G4.Telomeres are nucleoprotein structures that protect chromosome ends from degradation and ensure replication of the terminal DNA. In fact, many of replication proteins are involved in telomere maintenance, like RPA (Replication Protein A). RPA is a highly conserved heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein involved in DNA replication, recombination and repair. In S. pombe a mutation in the largest RPA subunit (Rpa1-D223Y) leads to substantial telomere shortening. In this study, we found that the D223Y mutation leads to the accumulation of aberrant secondary structures at telomeres. The presence of these secondary DNA structures correlates with a high association of Polα with telomeres suggesting that this mutation impairs lagging strand (G-rich) telomere replication. Strikingly, heterologous expression of the budding yeast Pif1 known to efficiently unwind G-quadruplex, human PIF1 and Phf1 (homolog of Pif1 in S.pombe) rescue the telomeric length defects of the D223Y cells. Furthermore, in vitro data show that the identical D to Y mutation in human RPA specifically affects its ability to bind G-quadruplex. We propose that RPA prevents the formation of G-quadruplex structures at lagging strand telomeres to facilitate telomerase action at telomeres. Furthermore, the study, in S.pombe, of the stability of G-rich repeat sequences (minisatellite CEB25) as known to form G4 enforce the hypothesis that RPA can prevents the formation of G4 or helps to solve this structure

A proto-telomere is elongated by telomerase in a shelterin-dependent manner in quiescent fission yeast cells

International audienceAbstract Telomere elongation is coupled with genome replication, raising the question of the repair of short telomeres in post-mitotic cells. We investigated the fate of a telomere-repeat capped end that mimics a single short telomere in quiescent fission yeast cells. We show that telomerase is able to elongate this single short telomere during quiescence despite the binding of Ku to the proto-telomere. While Taz1 and Rap1 repress telomerase in vegetative cells, both shelterin proteins are required for efficient telomere extension in quiescent cells, underscoring a distinct mode of telomerase control. We further show that Rad3ATR and Tel1ATM are redundantly required for telomere elongation in quiescence through the phosphorylation of Ccq1 and that Rif1 and its associated-PP1 phosphatases negatively regulate telomerase activity by opposing Ccq1 phosphorylation. The distinct mode of telomerase regulation in quiescent fission yeast cells may be relevant to that in human stem and progenitor cells

RPA and Pif1 cooperate to remove G-rich structures at both leading and lagging strand

International audienceIn Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the absence of Pif1 helicase induces the instability of G4-containing CEB1 minisatellite during leading strand but not lagging strand replication. We report that RPA and Pif1 cooperate to maintain CEB1 stability when the G4 forming strand is either on the leading or lagging strand templates. At the leading strand, RPA acts in the same pathway as Pif1 to maintain CEB1 stability. Consistent with this result, RPA co-precipitates with Pif1. This association between Pif1 and RPA is affected by the rfa1-D228Y mutation that lowers the affinity of RPA in particular for G-rich single-stranded DNA. At the lagging strand, in contrast to pif1∆, the rfa1-D228Y mutation strongly increases the frequency of CEB1 rearrangements. We explain that Pif1 is dispensable at the lagging strand DNA by the ability of RPA by itself to prevent formation of stable G-rich secondary structures during lagging strand synthesis. Remarkably, overexpression of Pif1 rescues the instability of CEB1 at the lagging strand in the rfa1-D228Y mutant indicating that Pif1 can also act at the lagging strand. We show that the effects of the rfa1-D228Y (rpa1-D223Y in fission yeast) are conserved in Schiz-osaccharomyces pombe. Finally, we report that RNase H1 interacts in a DNA-dependent manner with RPA in budding yeast, however overexpression of RNase H1 does not rescue CEB1 instability observed in pif1∆ and rfa1-D228Y mutants. Collectively these results add new insights about the general role of RPA in preventing formation of DNA secondary structures and in coordinating the action of factors aimed at resolving them

Eroded telomeres are rearranged in quiescent fission yeast cells through duplications of subtelomeric sequences

How both telomere stability is regulated and dysfunctional telomeres processed in quiescent cells is poorly understood. Here, the authors provide evidence that eroded telomeres in quiescent fission yeast are rearranged by homologous recombination through duplications of subtelomeric sequences

RPA and Pif1 cooperate to remove G-rich structures at both leading and lagging strand

International audienceIn Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the absence of Pif1 helicase induces the instability of G4-containing CEB1 minisatellite during leading strand but not lagging strand replication. We report that RPA and Pif1 cooperate to maintain CEB1 stability when the G4 forming strand is either on the leading or lagging strand templates. At the leading strand, RPA acts in the same pathway as Pif1 to maintain CEB1 stability. Consistent with this result, RPA co-precipitates with Pif1. This association between Pif1 and RPA is affected by the rfa1-D228Y mutation that lowers the affinity of RPA in particular for G-rich single-stranded DNA. At the lagging strand, in contrast to pif1∆, the rfa1-D228Y mutation strongly increases the frequency of CEB1 rearrangements. We explain that Pif1 is dispensable at the lagging strand DNA by the ability of RPA by itself to prevent formation of stable G-rich secondary structures during lagging strand synthesis. Remarkably, overexpression of Pif1 rescues the instability of CEB1 at the lagging strand in the rfa1-D228Y mutant indicating that Pif1 can also act at the lagging strand. We show that the effects of the rfa1-D228Y (rpa1-D223Y in fission yeast) are conserved in Schiz-osaccharomyces pombe. Finally, we report that RNase H1 interacts in a DNA-dependent manner with RPA in budding yeast, however overexpression of RNase H1 does not rescue CEB1 instability observed in pif1∆ and rfa1-D228Y mutants. Collectively these results add new insights about the general role of RPA in preventing formation of DNA secondary structures and in coordinating the action of factors aimed at resolving them