26 research outputs found

    Galectin-1 Deactivates Classically Activated Microglia and Protects from Inflammation-Induced Neurodegeneration

    Get PDF
    SummaryInflammation-mediated neurodegeneration occurs in the acute and the chronic phases of multiple sclerosis (MS) and its animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Classically activated (M1) microglia are key players mediating this process. Here, we identified Galectin-1 (Gal1), an endogenous glycan-binding protein, as a pivotal regulator of M1 microglial activation that targets the activation of p38MAPK-, CREB-, and NF-κB-dependent signaling pathways and hierarchically suppresses downstream proinflammatory mediators, such as iNOS, TNF, and CCL2. Gal1 bound to core 2 O-glycans on CD45, favoring retention of this glycoprotein on the microglial cell surface and augmenting its phosphatase activity and inhibitory function. Gal1 was highly expressed in the acute phase of EAE, and its targeted deletion resulted in pronounced inflammation-induced neurodegeneration. Adoptive transfer of Gal1-secreting astrocytes or administration of recombinant Gal1 suppressed EAE through mechanisms involving microglial deactivation. Thus, Gal1-glycan interactions are essential in tempering microglial activation, brain inflammation, and neurodegeneration, with critical therapeutic implications for MS

    Single-cell profiling reveals an endothelium-mediated immunomodulatory pathway in the eye choroid

    Get PDF
    The activity and survival of retinal photoreceptors depend on support functions performed by the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and on oxygen and nutrients delivered by blood vessels in the underlying choroid. By combining single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing, we categorized mouse RPE/choroid cell types and characterized the tissue-specific transcriptomic features of choroidal endothelial cells. We found that choroidal endothelium adjacent to the RPE expresses high levels of Indian Hedgehog and identified its downstream target as stromal GLI1+ mesenchymal stem cell-like cells. In vivo genetic impairment of Hedgehog signaling induced significant loss of choroidal mast cells, as well as an altered inflammatory response and exacerbated visual function defects after retinal damage. Our studies reveal the cellular and molecular landscape of adult RPE/choroid and uncover a Hedgehog-regulated choroidal immunomodulatory signaling circuit. These results open new avenues for the study and treatment of retinal vascular diseases and choroid-related inflammatory blinding disorders.Funding for this study was provided by National Institutes of Health grants EY08538 and GM34107 (E. Rodriguez-Boulan); EY027038 (R.F. Mullins); 1R21CA224391-01A1 (J.H. Zippin); and 1R01CA194547, 1U24CA210989, and P50CA211024 (O. Elemento); National Cancer Institute grant R01CA192176 and cancer center support grant P30 CA008748-48 (A.L. Joyner); Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid grant 2017-T1/BMD-5247 (I. Benedicto); Agencia Nacional Argentina de Promoción Cient´ıfica y Tecnológica grant PICT 2014-3687 and Fundación Sales (G.A. Rabinovich); a Pew Latin American Fellowship (G.L. Lehmann); Calder Research Scholar Award Vitiligo/Pigment Cell Disorders (J.H. Zippin); Starr Foundation Tri-Institutional Stem Cell Initiative award 2013-028; NYSTEM contract C32596GG; and Research to Prevent Blindness and Dyson Foundation departmental grants. The CNIC is supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, and the Pro CNIC Foundation and is a Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence (SEV-2015-0505).S

    IRE1α–XBP1 controls T cell function in ovarian cancer by regulating mitochondrial activity

    Get PDF
    Tumours evade immune control by creating hostile microenvironments that perturb T cell metabolism and effector function 1?4 . However, it remains unclear how intra-tumoral T cells integrate and interpret metabolic stress signals. Here we report that ovarian cancer?an aggressive malignancy that is refractory to standard treatments and current immunotherapies 5?8 ?induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and activates the IRE1α?XBP1 arm of the unfolded protein response 9,10 in T cells to control their mitochondrial respiration and anti-tumour function. In T cells isolated from specimens collected from patients with ovarian cancer, upregulation of XBP1 was associated with decreased infiltration of T cells into tumours and with reduced IFNG mRNA expression. Malignant ascites fluid obtained from patients with ovarian cancer inhibited glucose uptake and caused N-linked protein glycosylation defects in T cells, which triggered IRE1α?XBP1 activation that suppressed mitochondrial activity and IFNγ production. Mechanistically, induction of XBP1 regulated the abundance of glutamine carriers and thus limited the influx of glutamine that is necessary to sustain mitochondrial respiration in T cells under glucose-deprived conditions. Restoring N-linked protein glycosylation, abrogating IRE1α?XBP1 activation or enforcing expression of glutamine transporters enhanced mitochondrial respiration in human T cells exposed to ovarian cancer ascites. XBP1-deficient T cells in the metastatic ovarian cancer milieu exhibited global transcriptional reprogramming and improved effector capacity. Accordingly, mice that bear ovarian cancer and lack XBP1 selectively in T cells demonstrate superior anti-tumour immunity, delayed malignant progression and increased overall survival. Controlling endoplasmic reticulum stress or targeting IRE1α?XBP1 signalling may help to restore the metabolic fitness and anti-tumour capacity of T cells in cancer hosts.Fil: Song, Minkyung. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Sandoval, Tito A.. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Chae, Chang-Suk. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Chopra, Sahil. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Tan, Chen. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Rutkowski, Melanie R.. University of Virginia; Estados UnidosFil: Raundhal, Mahesh. Dana Farber Cancer Institute; Estados Unidos. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Chaurio, Ricardo A.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Payne, Kyle K.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Konrad, Csaba. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Bettigole, Sarah E.. Quentis Therapeutics Inc.; Estados UnidosFil: Shin, Hee Rae. Quentis Therapeutics Inc.; Estados UnidosFil: Crowley, Michael J. P.. Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Cerliani, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Kossenkov, Andrew V.. The Wistar Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Motorykin, Ievgen. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Zhang, Sheng. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Manfredi, Giovanni. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Zamarin, Dmitriy. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Estados UnidosFil: Holcomb, Kevin. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Rodriguez, Paulo C.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Rabinovich, Gabriel Adrián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Química Biológica; ArgentinaFil: Conejo Garcia, Jose R.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Glimcher, Laurie H.. Dana Farber Cancer Institute; Estados Unidos. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Cubillos-Ruiz, Juan R.. Weill Graduate School Of Medical Sciences; Estados Unidos. Weill Graduate School Of Medical Sciences; Estados Unido

    Interaction between FGFR-2, STAT5, and progesterone receptors in breast cancer

    Get PDF
    Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 2 (FGFR-2) polymorphisms have been associated with an increase in estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive breast cancer risk; however, a clear mechanistic association between FGFR-2 and steroid hormone receptors remains elusive. In previous works, we have shown a cross talk between FGF2 and progestins in mouse mammary carcinomas. To investigate the mechanisms underlying these interactions and to validate our findings in a human setting, we have used T47D human breast cancer cells and human cancer tissue samples. We showed that medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and FGF2 induced cell proliferation and activation of ERK, AKT, and STAT5 in T47D and in murine C4-HI cells. Nuclear interaction between PR, FGFR-2, and STAT5 after MPA and FGF2 treatment was also showed by confocal microscopy and immunoprecipitation. This effect was associated with increased transcription of PRE and/or GAS reporter genes, and of PR/STAT5-regulated genes and proteins. Two antiprogestins and the FGFR inhibitor PD173074, specifically blocked the effects induced by FGF2 or MPA respectively. The presence of PR/FGFR-2/ STAT5 complexes bound to the PRE probe was corroborated by using NoShift transcription and chromatin immunoprecipitation of the MYC promoter. Additionally, we showed that T47D cells stably transfected with constitutively active FGFR-2 gave rise to invasive carcinomas when transplanted into NOD/SCID mice. Nuclear colocalization between PR and FGFR-2/STAT5 was also observed in human breast cancer tissues. This study represents the first demonstration of a nuclear interaction between FGFR-2 and STAT5, as PR coactivators at the DNA progesterone responsive elements, suggesting that FGFRs are valid therapeutic targets for human breast cancer treatment. ©2011 AACR.Fil: Cerliani, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Guillardoy, Tomás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Giulianelli, Sebastian Jesus. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Vaque, José P.. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Gutkind JS. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Vanzulli, Silvia. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Martins, Rubén. Clínica Bancaria; ArgentinaFil: Zeitlin, Eduardo. Clínica Bancaria; ArgentinaFil: Lamb, Caroline Ana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Lanari, Claudia Lee Malvina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentin

    MIfEprIstoNE INhIBIts MpA-AND fGf2-INDuCED MAMMAry tuMor Growth But Not fGf2-INDuCED MAMMAry hypErplAsIA

    No full text
    Abstract We have previously demonstrated a crosstalk between fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and progestins inducing experimental breast cancer growth. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of FGF2 and of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on the mouse mammary glands and to investigate whether the antiprogestin RU486 was able to reverse the MPA-or FGF2-induced effects on both, mammary gland and tumor growth. We demonstrate that FGF2 administered locally induced an intraductal hyperplasia that was not reverted by RU486, suggesting that FGF2-induced effects are progesterone receptor (PR)-independent. However, MPA-induced paraductal hyperplasia was reverted by RU486 and a partial agonistic effect was observed in RU486-treated glands. Using C4-HD tumors which only grow in the presence of MPA, we showed that FGF2 administered intratumorally was able to stimulate tumor growth as MPA. The histology of FGF2-treated tumors showed different degrees of gland differentiation. RU486 inhibited both, MPA or FGF2 induced tumor growth. However, only complete regression was observed in MPA-treated tumors. Our results support the hypothesis that stromal FGF2 activates PR inducing hormone independent tumor growth. Key words: breast cancer, mammary gland, mammary carcinomas, FGF2, progestins, RU486 Resumen La mifepristona inhibe el crecimiento de carcinomas mamarios inducidos por MPA o por FGF2 pero no las hiperplasias mamarias inducidas por FGF2. hemos demostrado previamente que la vía de señalización del factor de crecimiento fibroblástico 2 (FGF2) interactúa con la vía de los receptores de progesterona (RP) induciendo el crecimiento del cáncer de mama experimental, y hemos postulado que el FGF2 estromal activaría los RP en los tumores hormono independientes. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar los efectos del FGF2 y del acetato de medroxiprogesterona (MPA) en la glándula mamaria de ratón e investigar si el antiprogestágeno RU486 induce la regresión del tumor hormono dependiente C4-HD que crece con MPA o con la administración intratumoral de FGF2. Demostramos que la administración diaria local de FGF2 induce una hiperplasia intraductal mamaria que no es revertida por el tratamiento con RU486. Por otra parte, el RU486 revierte la hiperplasia paraductal inducida por MPA y sólo induce un efecto agonista parcial. Estos datos sugieren que el efecto del FGF2 en la glándula mamaria es RP independiente. Demostramos que el tumor C4-HD crece in vivo con la administración intratumoral de FGF2. En este caso, la histología revela un mayor grado de diferenciación, similar al observado en el tumor C4-HI que crece sin el aporte exógeno de hormonas. El RU-486 inhibió tanto la estimulación inducida por MPA como por FGF2. Los resultados apoyan la hipótesis de que el FGF2 estromal activa al RP induciendo el crecimiento hormono independiente de tumores mamarios. Palabras clave: cáncer de mama, glándula mamaria, carcinomas mamarios, FGF2, progestágenos, RU48

    Histopathological findings in <i>Lgals1</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> and WT mice at 19 dpi with <i>T</i>. <i>cruzi</i> Tulahuén strain.

    No full text
    <p>A) Microphotographs representative of heart and skeletal muscle histopathological abnormalities (H&E). Parasite density (B) and Inflammation Index (C) were calculated as indicated in the Methods section. Bars represent mean ± SEM of 5–7 mice per group. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U test. *<i>p</i><0.05. F: Female mice; M: Male mice.</p

    Expression and release of Gal–1 in cultures of HL–1 cells infected with <i>T</i>. <i>cruzi</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Cells were infected with trypomastigotes of Tulahuén or Brazil strains, in a parasite:cell ratio of 5:1, and incubated for additional 2 or 5 days. A) Immunoblot analysis of Gal–1 expression in lysates from non-infected (a) and infected (b) HL–1 cells. Immunoreactive protein bands were semiquantified by densitometry. Results are expressed as Arbitrary Units (AU) relative to β-actin. B) RT-qPCR analysis of Gal–1 mRNA expression of non-infected and infected HL–1 cells. Results are expressed as relative to GAPDH mRNA. C) Detection of Gal–1 in the supernatant of non-infected and infected HL–1 using trypomastigotes of the Tulahuén and Brazil strains, as measured by ELISA. D) Detection of LDH activity in the supernatants of non-infected and infected HL–1 cells by using the LDH-UP kit (Weiner Lab, Argentina), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Results are expressed as Units/ml (U/ml). Data represent the mean ± SEM of three (A and B) and two (C and D) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s <i>t</i> test for data shown in A (a <i>vs</i> b) and using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test in the remaining experiments. *<i>p</i><0.05; ***<i>p</i><0.001.</p
    corecore