Comparison study of two surgical options for distal tibia fracture—minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs. open reduction and internal fixation

The aim of this study was to compare the results between two surgical options for distal tibia fracture, i.e. minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) vs. open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and explore the benefits and defects of these two techniques. Thirty cases of distal tibia fracture (15 pairs of ORIF and MIPO) were submitted for pair comparison with consistence of gender, age and AO fracture classification. Indexes for evaluation included operative time, blood loss, healing time, time of recovery to work, implant irritation symptoms, and union status. Mazur grading standard was introduced for functional evaluation. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 13.0 was used for analysis. No malunion occurred and one case of osteomyelitis developed in the ORIF group. In the ORIF group, ten cases were evaluated as excellent, three as good, one as fair and one as poor. In the MIPO group, ten cases were excellent and five good. Paired t-test found no significant differences between groups on the indexes for analysis. In conclusion, the MIPO technique is not distinctively superior to ORIF in treatment of distal tibia fracture

A new approach to local DCO in ankle fracture dislocations: external fixation with diaphyseal unicortical screws applied by local anaesthesia

Purpose: Ankle fracture dislocations represent a great threat for soft tissue viability and articular instability. The use of a temporary ankle bridging ExFix plays a fundamental role in the local damage control orthopaedics while waiting for definitive synthesis. Methods: For this prospective research, we have developed a full application protocol of innovative diaphyseal monocortical screws fixator (Unyco–OrthofixTM) exclusively under local anaesthesia. Rigid selection criteria allowed us to collect nine patients during a period of almost 2 years. VAS score was analysed for the feasibility of the procedure, and a thorough radiologic evaluation was performed. Results: Results pointed out that the calcaneus pin insertion (VAS: 3.44) followed by the local anaesthetics injection (VAS: 3.22) was the most painful, without precluding to continue the procedure; fracture temporary stability was achieved in all the cases. Conclusions: The procedure of monocortical diaphyseal application in bridging external fixation is comparable to the conventional transcalcaneal traction maintaining the advantage in terms of speediness, independence from anaesthetists and feasibility within few minutes from hospital admittance even in patients under anticoagulants therapy, but increasing the stability of the reduction and improving the quality of nursing (so-called portable traction)