4 research outputs found
Risk preferences and predictions about others: no association with 2D:4D ratio
Abstract: Prenatal androgen exposure affects the brain development of the fetus which may facilitate certain behaviors and decision patterns in the later life. The ratio between the lengths of second and the fourth fingers (2D:4D) is a negative biomarker of the ratio between prenatal androgen and estrogen exposure and men typically have lower ratios than women. In line with the typical findings suggesting that women are more risk averse than men, several studies have also shown negative relationships between 2D:4D and risk taking although the evidence is not conclusive. Previous studies have also reported that both men and women believe women are more risk averse than men. In the current study, we re-test the relationship between 2D:4D and risk preferences in a German student sample and also investigate whether the 2D:4D ratio is associated with peopleâs perceptions about othersâ risk preferences. Following an incentivized risk elicitation task, we asked all participants their predictions about (i) othersâ responses (without sex specification), (ii) menâs responses, and (iii) womenâs responses; then measured their 2D:4D ratios. In line with the previous findings, female participants in our sample were more risk averse. While both men and women underestimated other participantsâ (non sex-specific) and womenâs risky decisions on average, their predictions about men were accurate. We also found evidence for the false consensus effect, as risky choices are positively correlated with predictions about other participantsâ risky choices. The 2D:4D ratio was not directly associated either with risk preferences or the predictions of other participantsâ choices. An unexpected finding was that women with mid-range levels of 2D:4D estimated significantly larger sex differences in participantsâ decisions. This finding needs further testing in future studies
Representative sequencing: Unbiased sampling of solid tumor tissue
International audienceAlthough thousands of solid tumors have been sequenced to date, a fundamental under-sampling bias isinherent in current methodologies. This is caused by a tissue sample input of fixed dimensions (e.g., 6 mmbiopsy), which becomes grossly under-powered as tumor volume scales. Here, we demonstrate representative sequencing (Rep-Seq) as a new method to achieve unbiased tumor tissue sampling. Rep-Seq uses fixed residual tumor material, which is homogenized and subjected to next-generation sequencing. Analysis of intratumor tumor mutation burden (TMB) variability shows a high level of misclassification using current single-biopsy methods, with 20% of lung and 52% of bladder tumors having at least one biopsy with high TMB butlow clonal TMB overall. Misclassification rates by contrast are reduced to 2% (lung) and 4% (bladder) when a more representative sampling methodology is used. Rep-Seq offers an improved sampling protocol for tumor profiling, with significant potential for improved clinical utility and more accurate deconvolution of clonal structure