327 research outputs found
“Who doesn’t think about technology when designing urban environments for older people?” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO’s age-friendly cities model
The World Health Organization (WHO) strives to assist and inspire cities to become more “age-friendly”, and the fundamentals are included in the Global Age-Friendly Cities Guide. An age-friendly city enables residents to grow older actively within their families, neighbourhoods and civil society, and offers extensive opportunities for the participation of older people in the community. Over the decades, technology has become essential for contemporary and future societies, and even more imperative as the decades move on, given we are nearly in our third decade of the twenty-first century. Yet, technology is not explicitly considered in the 8-domain model by WHO, which describes an age-friendly city. This paper discusses the gaps in the WHO’s age-friendly cities model in the field of technology and provides insights and recommendations for expansion of the model for application in the context of countries with a high human development index that wish to be fully age-friendly. This work is distinctive because of the proposed new age-friendly framework, and the work presented in this paper contributes to the fields of gerontology, geography urban and development, computer science, and gerontechnology
Comment on “providing value to new health technology: the early contribution of entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies”
Lehoux et al provide a highly valid contribution in conceptualizing value in value propositions for new health technologies and developing an analytic framework that illustrates the interplay between health innovation supply-side logic (the logic of emergence) and demand-side logic (embedding in the healthcare system). This commentary brings forth several considerations on this article. First, a detailed stakeholder analysis provides the necessary premonition of potential hurdles in the development, implementation and dissemination of a new technology. This can be achieved by categorizing potential stakeholder groups on the basis of the potential impact of future technology. Secondly, the conceptualization of value in value propositions of new technologies should not only embrace business/economic and clinical values but also ethical, professional and cultural values, as well as factoring in the notion of usability and acceptance of new technology. As a final note, the commentary emphasises the point that technology should facilitate delivery of care without negatively affecting doctorpatient communications, physical examination skills, and development of clinical knowledge.peer-reviewe
Alcoholverstrekking aan jongeren onder de 16 jaar in de regio Noord-Kennemerland : Nalevingsonderzoek & Beleidsadvies Regio Noord-Kennemerland
[Editorial] Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
Abstract not available (Editorial).
Original publication at MDPI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041644
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI
The Conceptualization of Value in the Value Proposition of New Health Technologies Comment on “Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies”
Abstract
Lehoux et al provide a highly valid contribution in conceptualizing value in value propositions for new health
technologies and developing an analytic framework that illustrates the interplay between health innovation
supply-side logic (the logic of emergence) and demand-side logic (embedding in the healthcare system). This
commentary brings forth several considerations on this article. First, a detailed stakeholder analysis provides
the necessary premonition of potential hurdles in the development, implementation and dissemination of a
new technology. This can be achieved by categorizing potential stakeholder groups on the basis of the potential
impact of future technology. Secondly, the conceptualization of value in value propositions of new technologies
should not only embrace business/economic and clinical values but also ethical, professional and cultural values,
as well as factoring in the notion of usability and acceptance of new technology. As a final note, the commentary
emphasises the point that technology should facilitate delivery of care without negatively affecting doctorpatient communications, physical examination skills, and development of clinical knowledge
Recommended from our members
Digitalising the built environment for all generations: A new paradigm for equity and inclusive age-friendly cities and communities
This is an editorial piece
Alcoholverstrekking aan jongeren onder de 16 jaar in de regio Noord-Kennemerland : Nalevingsonderzoek & Beleidsadvies Regio Noord-Kennemerland
Building Inclusive Environments for All Ages with Citizens
The paper provides an introduction to the public discourse around the notion of smart healthy inclusive environments. First, the basic ideas are explained and related to citizen participation in the context of implementation of a "society for all ages" concept disseminated by the United Nations. Next, the text discusses selected initiatives of the European Commission in the field of intergenerational programming and policies as well as features of the COST Action NET4Age-Friendly: Smart Healthy Age-Friendly Environments (SHAFE). The following sections are focused on studying and discussing examples of projects and methodologies that have been aimed at: empowering facilitators of smart healthy inclusive environments, empowering citizens to deal with health emergencies, and supporting older people's voices. The conclusion covers selected recommendations for entities of public policy on ageing (ageing policy) as well as potential directions for further research
- …