13 research outputs found
Multiple Soft Tissue Sarcomas in a Single Patient:An International Multicentre Review
Developing multiple soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) is a rare process, sparsely reported in the literature to date. Little is known about the pattern of disease development or outcomes in these patients. Patients were identified from three tertiary orthopaedic oncology centres in Canada and the UK. Patients who developed multiple extremity STSs were collated retrospectively from prospective oncology databases. A literature review using MEDLINE was also performed. Six patients were identified in the case series from these three institutions, and five studies were identified from the literature review. Overall, 17 patients were identified with a median age of 51 years (range: 19 to 77). The prevalence of this manifestation in STS patients is 1 in 1225. The median disease-free interval between diagnoses was 2.3 years (range: 0 to 19 years). Most patients developed the secondary STS in a metachronous pattern, the remaining, synchronously. The median survival after the first sarcoma was 6 years, and it was 1.6 years after the second sarcoma. The 5-year overall survival rate was 83.3% and 50% following the first and second STS diagnoses, respectively. A diagnosis of two STSs does not confer a worse prognosis than the diagnosis of a single STS. Developing a second STS is a rare event with no identifiable histological pattern of occurrence. Presentation in a metachronous pattern is more common. A high degree of vigilance is required in patients with a previous STS both to detect both local recurrence and to identify new masses remote from the previous STS site. Acquiring an early histological diagnosis should be attempted
In patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer, is video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy an appropriate alternative to video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy?
A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'In patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer, is video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy an appropriate alternative to video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy?' Two hundred papers were found using the reported search, of which 8 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. In one meta-analysis identified, there was no significant difference observed between groups in overall survival (HR = 0.808, 95% CI 0.556-1.174). All other studies identified also found no significant difference in overall survival. As well, local and distant recurrence rates and disease-free survival were similar in all studies. Two studies identified a significantly greater number of lymph nodes dissected with the video-assisted thoracosopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy procedure; however, all other studies noted no significant difference. There was evidence from two studies that VATS segmentectomy is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay than lobectomy. Between both groups, there was an overall low number of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality (highest n = 2), highlighting the safety of both procedures. Three studies compared patient groups with similar tumour sizes; the average tumour size was 17 Ā± 1 mm. However, in the four other observational studies, the tumour size in the VATS lobectomy group was significantly larger. From the limited evidence currently available, VATS segmentectomy appears to be a valid alternative to VATS lobectomy. The included studies were mainly retrospective observational studies, with one meta-analysis; however, there are currently two large randomized trials ongoing with results expected to be reported in 2021
The association between preoperative COVID-19-positivity and acute postoperative complication risk among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a matched cohort analysis
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the risk of postoperative complications in COVID-19-positive patients undergoing common orthopaedic procedures. Methods: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) database, patients who underwent common orthopaedic surgery procedures from 1 January to 31 December 2021 were extracted. Patient preoperative COVID-19 status, demographics, comorbidities, type of surgery, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Propensity score matching was conducted between COVID-19-positive and -negative patients. Multivariable regression was then performed to identify both patient and provider risk factors independently associated with the occurrence of 30-day postoperative adverse events. Results: Of 194,121 included patients, 740 (0.38%) were identified to be COVID-19-positive. Comparison of comorbidities demonstrated that COVID-19-positive patients had higher rates of diabetes, heart failure, and pulmonary disease. After propensity matching and controlling for all preoperative variables, multivariable analysis found that COVID-19-positive patients were at increased risk of several postoperative complications, including: any adverse event, major adverse event, minor adverse event, death, venous thromboembolism, and pneumonia. COVID-19-positive patients undergoing hip/knee arthroplasty and trauma surgery were at increased risk of 30-day adverse events. Conclusion: COVID-19-positive patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery had increased odds of many 30-day postoperative complications, with hip/knee arthroplasty and trauma surgery being the most high-risk procedures. These data reinforce prior literature demonstrating increased risk of venous thromboembolic events in the acute postoperative period. Clinicians caring for patients undergoing orthopaedic procedures should be mindful of these increased risks, and attempt to improve patient care during the ongoing global pandemic. Cite this article: Bone Jt OpenĀ 2023;4(9):704ā712
Optimizing spine surgery instrument trays to immediately increase efficiency and reduce costs in the operating room
Background: Over-crowded surgical trays result in perioperative inefficiency and unnecessary costs. While methodologies to reduce the size of surgical trays have been described in the literature, they each have their own drawbacks. In this study, we compared three methods: (1) clinician review (CR), (2) mathematical programming (MP), and (3) a novel hybrid model (HM) based on surveys and cost analysis. While CR and MP are well documented, CR can yield suboptimal reductions and MP can be laborious and technically challenging. We hypothesized our easy-to-implement HM would result in a reduction of surgical instruments in both the laminectomy tray (LT) and basic neurosurgery tray (BNT) that is comparable to CR and MP. Methods: Three approaches were tested: CR, MP, and HM. We interviewed 5 neurosurgeons and 3 orthopedic surgeons, at our institution, who performed a total of 5437 spine cases, requiring the use of the LT and BNT over a 4-year (2017ā2021) period. In CR, surgeons suggested which surgical instruments should be removed. MP was performed via the mathematical analysis of 25 observations of the use of a LT and BNT tray. The HM was performed via a structured survey of the surgeonsā estimated instrument usage, followed by a cost-based inflection point analysis. Results: The CR, MP, and HM approaches resulted in a total instrument reduction of 41%, 35%, and 38%, respectively, corresponding to total cost savings per annum of 46,348.80, and $44,417.60, respectively. Conclusions: While hospitals continue to examine perioperative services for potential inefficiencies, surgical inventory will be increasingly scrutinized. Despite MP being the most accurate methodology to do so, our results suggest that savings were similar across all three methods. CR and HM are significantly less laborious and thus are practical alternatives
Pelvic Ewing sarcoma: Should all patients receive pre-operative radiotherapy, or should it be delivered selectively?
BACKGROUND
Locally recurrent disease following surgical resection of Ewing sarcoma (ES) confers a poor prognosis. Limited evidence is available evaluating non-selective use of pre-operative radiotherapy (RT) for patients with pelvic ES and its effect on local control and survival.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
49 consecutive patients with pelvic ES were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collated database. Patients either received non-selective pre-operative RT and surgery (nĀ =Ā 27), or selective post-operative RT (nĀ =Ā 22) (surgery alone (nĀ =Ā 11) or surgery and post-operative RT (nĀ =Ā 11)).
RESULTS
Patients who had non-selective pre-operative radiotherapy appeared to have a higher LRFS, 88.0% compared to 66.5% in the selective RT group (pĀ =Ā 0.096, Kaplan Meier; pĀ =Ā 0.028, Chi-squared). Administration of non-selective, pre-operative RT to all patients with pelvic ES elevates the LFRS to that of the good responder group (ā„90% tumour necrosis and margins, pĀ =Ā 0.880). There was no difference in metastasis-free survival, 60.0% and 54.5% (pĀ =Ā 0.728) and overall survival (OS), 57.7% and 63.6% (pĀ =Ā 0.893). The majority of pre-operative RT patients had both good necrosis (ā„90%) (pĀ =Ā 0.003) and widely excised tumours, 81.5% vs 59.1% (pĀ =Ā 0.080). Tumour volume ā„250Ā ml was associated with worse LRFS (pĀ =Ā 0.045) and post-operative complications (pĀ =Ā 0.017). There may be improved LRFS (pĀ =Ā 0.057) with pre-operative proton-beam RT compared to surgery and selective post-operative RT.
CONCLUSION
Pre-operative photon or proton-beam RT to all pelvic ES may improve LRFS compared to the selective delivery of post-operative RT. Radiotherapy delivered to all patients results in a greater percentage of highly necrotic tumours at surgical excision, enabling a greater proportion of patients with wide resection margins
Megaprosthesis anti-bacterial coatings: A comprehensive translational review
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are catastrophic complications for
patients with implanted megaprostheses and pose significant challenges
in the management of orthopaedic oncology patients. Despite various
preventative strategies, with the increasing rate of implanted
orthopaedic prostheses, the number of PJIs may be increasing. PJIs are
associated with a high rate of amputation. Therefore, novel strategies
to combat bacterial colonization and biofilm formation are required. A
promising strategy is the utilization of anti-bacterial coatings on
megaprosthetic implants. In this translational review, a brief overview
of the mechanism of bacterial colonization of implants and biofilm
formation will be provided, followed by a discussion and classification
of major anti-bacterial coatings currently in use and development. In
addition, current in vitro outcomes, clinical significance, economic
importance, evolutionary perspectives, and future directions of
anti-bacterial coatings will also be discussed. Megaprosthetic
anti-bacterial coating strategies will help reduce infection rates
following the implantation of megaprostheses and would positively impact
sarcoma care
Use of virtual reality for the management of phantom limb pain: a systematic review
To summarize the research on the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) therapy for the management of phantom limb pain (PLP). Three databases (SCOPUS, Ovid Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE) were searched for studies investigating the use of VR therapy for the treatment of PLP. Original research articles fulfilling the following criteria were included: (i) patients 18āyears and older; (ii) all etiologies of amputation; (iii) any level of amputation; (iv) use of immersive VR as a treatment modality for PLP; (v) self-reported objective measures of PLP before and after at least one VR session; (vi) written in English. A total of 15 studies were included for analysis. Fourteen studies reported decreases in objective pain scores following a single VR session or a VR intervention consisting of multiple sessions. Moreover, combining VR with tactile stimulation had a larger beneficial effect on PLP compared with VR alone. Based on the current literature, VR therapy has the potential to be an effective treatment modality for the management of PLP. However, the low quality of studies, heterogeneity in subject population and intervention type, and lack of data on long-term relief make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions.IMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATIONVirtual reality (VR) therapy has emerged as a new potential treatment option for phantom limb pain (PLP) that circumvents some limitations of mirror therapy.VR therapy was shown to decrease PLP following a single VR session as well as after an intervention consisting of multiple sessions.The addition of vibrotactile stimuli to VR therapy may lead to larger decreases in PLP scores compared with VR therapy alone. Virtual reality (VR) therapy has emerged as a new potential treatment option for phantom limb pain (PLP) that circumvents some limitations of mirror therapy. VR therapy was shown to decrease PLP following a single VR session as well as after an intervention consisting of multiple sessions. The addition of vibrotactile stimuli to VR therapy may lead to larger decreases in PLP scores compared with VR therapy alone.</p