42 research outputs found

    Recent UK population based studies of prevalence of chlamydia in the general population.

    No full text
    a<p>Natsal and ClaSS estimates weighted by sampling probabilities, Natsal 2010 additionally weighted for test refusal. ALSPAC adjusted prevalence estimates based on multiply-imputed data.</p

    Adjusted associations between chlamydia infection and gender, socioeconomic position, education and number of sexual partners, with complete case analysis and using three sensitivity tests examining missing data.

    No full text
    a<p>N varies between 1809 and 2879 due to missing values of measures of socioeconomic position and number of sexual partners.</p>b<p>Model 1: Adjusted for age and other measures of socio-economic position that were considered to be potential confounders, identified using a hierarchical conceptual framework.</p>c<p>Model 2: Adjusted for variables in Model 1 and reported number of sexual partners.</p

    Unadjusted associations between chlamydia infection and gender, socioeconomic position, education and number of sexual partners.

    No full text
    a<p>Unadjusted analyses using all available data. 2879 participants have valid results from chlamydia tests at the clinic. Counts for some covariables add up to less than 2879 due to missing values of exposures.</p

    Estimates of prevalence of chlamydia Infection i) for all participants and ii) those reporting sexual activity, by gender, with and without sensitivity test for bias due to missing data.

    No full text
    <p>Notes: <sup>a</sup>Data were multiply imputed for the 9568 participants who attended the study clinic.</p>b<p>The number of cases of chlamydia among participants reporting sexual activity is 16, rather than 20, because four participants who tested positive for chlamydia did not respond to the question on sexual activity.</p

    Descriptives of confounders by frequency of cigarette use at age 16% (N).

    No full text
    <p><sup>1</sup>No higher education. Categorised like this for purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p><sup>2</sup>Defined as score of 4 or over, for the purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p><sup>3</sup>Early onset persistent group membership. Categorised like this for purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p><sup>4</sup>Ever used cannabis. Categorised like this for purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p><sup>5</sup>Hazardous alcohol use. Categorised like this for purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p>Descriptives of confounders by frequency of cigarette use at age 16% (N).</p

    Descriptives of confounders by cumulative cannabis use at age 16% (N).

    No full text
    <p>FH- family history; IQ- intelligence quotient.</p><p><sup>1</sup>No higher education. Categorised like this for purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p><sup>2</sup>Defined as score of 4 or over, for the purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p><sup>3</sup>Early onset persistent group membership. Categorised like this for purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p><sup>4</sup>Weekly or daily smoking. Categorised like this for purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p><sup>5</sup>Hazardous alcohol use. Categorised like this for purposes of presentation in this table only.</p><p>Descriptives of confounders by cumulative cannabis use at age 16% (N).</p
    corecore