CORR Insights (R): Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System

International audienceno abstrac

Les prothèses fémoro-patellaires (état actuel, recul après plus de dix ans)

AIX-MARSEILLE2-BU Méd/Odontol. (130552103) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Survival of Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 5 to 23 Years

Recent literature suggests patients achieve substantial short-term functional improvement after combined bicompartmental implants but longer-term durability has not been documented. We therefore asked whether (1) bicompartmental arthroplasty (either combined medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and femoropatellar arthroplasty (PFA) or medial UKA/PFA, or combined medial and lateral UKA or bicompartmental UKA) reliably improved Knee Society pain and function scores; (2) bicompartmental arthroplasty was durable (survivorship, radiographic loosening, or symptomatic disease progression); (3) we could achieve durable alignment; and (4) the arthritis would progress in the unresurfaced compartment. We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients (100 knees) with bicompartmental UKA and 71 patients (77 knees) with medial UKA/PFA. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 12 years; range, 5–23 years). Bicompartmental arthroplasty reliably alleviated pain and improved function. Prosthesis survivorship at 17 years was 78% in the bicompartmental UKA group and 54% in the medial UKA/PFA group. The high revision rate, compared with total knee arthroplasty, may be related to several factors such as implant design, patient selection, crude or absent instrumentation, or component malalignment, which can all contribute to the relatively high failure rate in this series

Do Stemmed Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty Improve Outcomes in Patients With Obesity?

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical studies have reported that patients with higher body mass index (BMI) are more likely to experience premature failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), lower knee scores, and perhaps more pain in the prosthetic joint. However, it is not known whether certain implant design features such as tibial stems might be associated with differences in the frequency of tibial pain in patients with higher BMIs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Therefore, it was our aim to compare (1) function and pain (as measured by the New Knee Society Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and visual analog pain scores); (2) quality of life (as measured by SF-12); and (3) mechanical complications and premature revision (defined as revision before 2 years) between patients with obesity undergoing TKA (BMI \textgreater 30 kg/m(2)) who received either a stemmed or an unstemmed tibial component. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 120 patients with a BMI \textgreater 30 kg/m(2) scheduled for primary arthritis TKAs and end-stage knee osteoarthritis were included. Patients were stratified into groups defined as moderately obese (BMI 30-35 kg/m(2), N = 60) and severely obese (BMI \textgreater 35 kg/m(2), N = 60) groups. Patients in each stratified subgroup then were randomized to receive either a stemmed (10 mm/100 mm) proximally cemented tibial component or the other, a standard cemented component. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years after surgery using the new Knee Society Score (KSS), KOOS, SF-12 score, and a visual analog pain score after 100 meters of walking. Although no minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) have yet been defined for the new KSS, we considered differences smaller than 10 points to be unlikely to be clinically important; the MCID for the KOOS is estimated at 8 to 10 points, the SF-12 to be 4 points, and the visual analog scale to be 2 cm on a 10-cm scale. Patients were followed until death, revision, or for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 3 ± 0.8 years; range, 2-4 years). No patient was lost to followup before 2 years. RESULTS: Although we found that patients treated with stemmed TKAs had higher functional outcomes, the differences were small and unlikely to be clinically important (subjective KSS mean 69 ± 7 points versus 75 ± 7, mean difference 6 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2-11, p = 0.03; objective KSS mean 80 ± 6 points versus 85 ± 6 points, mean difference 5 points, 95% CI 0-9, p = 0.01). Compared with patients with a stemmed TKA, patients with a standard implant reported lower KOOS pain subscores (81 ± 9 versus 76 ± 8; p = 0.04) and lower KOOS symptom subscores (74 ± 7 versus 68 ± 7; p = 0.03). The proportions of patients experiencing complications were not different with the numbers available for all groups and subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Although we detected differences in some patient-reported outcomes scores for pain and function favoring implants with stems, the differences were small and unlikely to be clinically important. Because these stems may have disadvantages, perhaps including difficulty of revision, we cannot draw a strong conclusion in support of their use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study

Implantation of the Femoral Component Relative to the Tibial Component in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Clinical, Radiological, and Biomechanical Study

Knee-Society Meeting, ELECTR NETWORK, SEP, 2021Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a procedure with low morbidity and fast recovery. Anatomic implants or robotic-assisted UKA has been proposed to improve outcomes with precise positioning. Femoral component position (FCP) relative to the tibial insert could be a factor influencing the contact stresses. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the FCP relative to the tibial insert on clinical outcomes and stress distribution after medial UKA. Methods: Sixty-two medial fixed-bearing UKAs were evaluated at a minimum two-year follow-up using the Knee Society Score. Postoperative radiological evaluation performed on frontal X-rays classified the FCP relative to the tibial insert into the following: group M (medial), group C (central), and group L (lateral). A finite element model was developed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the FCP relative to the tibial component. Results: The postoperative radiological evaluation showed 9 cases in group M, 46 cases in group C, and 7 cases in group L. The maximum knee flexion angle and the 2-year postoperative ``symptom'' and ``patient satisfaction'' scores of the Knee Society Score were significantly higher in group C. Compared with central positioning, a shift along the mediolateral axis leads to a displacement of the contact pressure center. Conclusion: The FCP relative to the tibial insert may increase patient outcomes at a minimum follow-up of two years after fixed-bearing medial UKA. Accordance between FCP and contact stresses on the polyethylene insert could be a contributing factor of long-term survival of UKA. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Trabecular Metal Cones Combined With Short Cemented Stem Allow Favorable Outcomes in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Place: United StatesInternational audienceBACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and implant survivorship at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up of several reconstruction techniques with or without metaphyseal cone and stems of variable length.METHODS: A retrospective comparative matched analysis was performed from 2 prospectively collected databases. Only patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty procedures for aseptic causes using a single design of rotating hinge knee with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up were analyzed. Patients were separated into 3 groups: trabecular metal (TM) cones + short cemented stems (TM + short stem [SS]), TM cones + long uncemented stems (TM + long stem [LS]), and no cone (NC) + long uncemented stems (NC + LS). A matching process based on age (±5 years) was realized.RESULTS: About 99 patients were included; 33 in the TM + SS group, 33 in the TM + LS group, and 33 in the NC + LS group. The mean time of follow-up was 9.3 years. A significant difference of the improvement of subscale pain, symptom, activities of daily living, quality of life of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score and knee, function of the Knee Society Score was observed in favor of TM + SS group compared with the 2 other groups. At 8 years of survivorship, the components free of revision for any cause were 90.9% for the TM + SS group, 84.9% for the TM + LS group, and 90.6% for the NC + LS group.CONCLUSION: The use of a short cemented tibial stem combined with a TM cone in revision total knee arthroplasty offers identical survival rate with better functional outcome compared with the use of a long uncemented stem associated with TM cones or metallic augments at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up