Anticoagulation du circuit extracorporel en hemodialyse chronique : cibles pharmacologiques, surveillance biologique

REIMS-BU Santé (514542104) / SudocSudocFranceF

Tissue factor expressed by adherent cells contributes to hemodialysis-membrane thrombogenicity

International audienceIntroduction: Fondaparinux (FDX) was demonstrated to be cardioprotective in a rat model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion. In this model, FDX reduced infarct size after 2h of reperfusion, involving the activation of the survivor activating factor enhancement (SAFE) pathway as early as 30min post-reperfusion. Our aim was to study if this cardioprotection could be explained by anti-inflammatory mechanisms and a protective effect on vessels.Methods: Wistar male rats were subjected to 40minutes (min) of myocardial ischemia, followed by 30min or 2h of reperfusion. Rats were randomized into four groups: control 30min (n=7), FDX 30min (n=7), control 2h (n=7), and FDX 2h (n=7). The FDX groups received 10mg/kg injection of FDX 10min prior to initiating reperfusion. We studied: 1) mRNA expression of endothelial markers, such as thrombomodulin (TM), endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR), and tissue factor (TF) and 2) proteic expression of ICAM-1, NF-κB, IκB, and JNK. Leukocyte infiltration was assessed by histochemistry. We also evaluated TM and EPCR mRNA expression in a model of isolated rat mesenteric arteries incubated with FDX.Results: FDX upregulated the expression of TM and EPCR mRNA in the models of myocardial infarction and isolated mesenteric arteries. No difference was observed between the treated and control groups regarding the expression of pro-inflammatory signaling proteins, adhesion molecules, and leukocyte infiltration after 2h of reperfusion.Conclusion: The cardioprotective effect of FDX at early-stage reperfusion could be related to vascular protection, yet not to an anti-inflammatory effect

Effects of rabeprazole on the antiplatelet effects and pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers.: PK/PD interaction between rabeprazole and clopidogrel

International audienceBACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), mostly omeprazole, interact with clopidogrel efficacy by inhibiting the formation of its active metabolite via CYP2C19 inhibition. Whether this occurs with all PPIs is a matter of debate. As rabeprazole is a less potent CYP2C19 inhibitor than other PPIs, we studied the interaction between rabeprazole and the antiplatelet actions and pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel. AIM: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of rabeprazole over placebo using change in platelet reactivity index (PRI; vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein [VASP] assay) in a predefined population of good clopidogrel responders. Omeprazole was used as the positive control. METHODS: In this randomized three-period crossover study in healthy volunteers, 36 healthy men received clopidogrel (75mg/day for 7 days) with placebo, omeprazole (20mg/day) or rabeprazole (20mg/day). Clopidogrel antiplatelet effects and disposition kinetics were assessed on day 7 of combination therapy. Non-inferiority threshold was predefined as an upper limit of the 90% confidence interval for the difference in change in PRI between placebo and rabeprazole of30%), the clopidogrel antiplatelet effect remained non-inferior to placebo during rabeprazole (difference 3.4% [-1.7; 8.5]) but not omeprazole (difference 7.5% [2.5; 12.6]) co-administration. The AUC0-24 and Cmax of active clopidogrel metabolite decreased with both omeprazole and rabeprazole, and conditions of bioequivalence were not met, except for AUC0-24 with rabeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole does not interact with clopidogrel to the same extent as omeprazole. However, under our experimental conditions and proton-pump inhibitor doses, there was no significant pharmacodynamic interaction between rabeprazole or omeprazole and clopidogrel, despite a significant decrease in the formation of clopidogrel active metabolite

Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study Comparing Heparin-induced Platelet Activation Test to 14C-serotonin Release Assay

International audienceAbstract Laboratory confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is of crucial importance and remains challenging and relies on platelet functional assays highlighting the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies in patient serum or plasma. Platelet functional assays using washed platelets include the 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA), usually described as the gold standard, and the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA). Since its first comparison with SRA there has been no additional published study regarding HIPA diagnostic performances compared with SRA. Aim of our retrospective study was to compare the concordance between HIPA and SRA in HIT suspected-patients with positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies between October 2010 and October 2015. Fifty-five HIT-suspected patients who beneficiated from both HIPA and SRA were included. Positive and negative percent agreements were 83.8% (95% CI 68.0–93.8%) and 66.7% (95% CI 41.0–86.7%), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 78.2% (95% CI 65.0–92.2%). Agreement was higher in patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass with extracorporeal circulation circuit for cardiac surgery. We also confirm that the use of a minimum of 2 platelet donors to establish positive HIT diagnosis and 4 platelet donors to exclude HIT diagnosis allows obtaining a good agreement with SRA. Although HIPA and SRA were performed with different platelet donors and in different laboratories, HIPA had a good positive agreement with SRA for HIT diagnosis, showing that HIPA is a useful functional assay that does not require radioactivity and could be developed worldwide to improve HIT diagnosis

Evolution of platelet functions in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation: A prospective exploration over a month.

This prospective observational study was designed to analyze platelet functions across time in 50 patients scheduled for liver transplantation (LT) secondary to decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Platelet functions were assessed before LT (pre-LT), one week (D7) and 1 month (D28) after LT. Platelet count significantly increased from pre-LT time to day 28 as well as circulating CD34+hematopoietic stem cells. To avoid any influence of platelet count on assays, platelet function was evaluated on platelet-rich-plasma adjusted to pre-LT platelet count. Although platelet secretion potential did not differ between time-points, as evaluated by the expression of CD62P upon strong activation, platelet aggregation in response to various agonists significantly increased along time, however with no concomitant increase of circulating markers of platelet activation: platelet microvesicles, platelet-leukocyte complexes, soluble CD40L and soluble CD62P. In the multivariate analysis, hepatic function was associated with platelet count and function. A lower platelet aggregation recovery was correlated with Child C score. History of thrombosis or bleeding was associated with respective higher or lower values of platelet aggregation. This longitudinal analysis of platelet functions in LT patients showed an improvement of platelet functions along time together with platelet count increase, with no evidence of platelet hyperactivation at any time-point

Real Life Population Pharmacokinetics Modelling of Eight Factors VIII in Patients with Severe Haemophilia A: Is It Always Relevant to Switch to an Extended Half-Life?

International audienc

Baseline characteristics of the study population at inclusion and quality of the liver graft.

<p>Baseline characteristics of the study population at inclusion and quality of the liver graft.</p

Evolution of platelet functions in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation: A prospective exploration over a month - Fig 2

<p><b>(A) Boxplots for platelet count and (B) CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor stem cells at different time points.</b> Horizontal lines show median values and the 25–75 percentiles. Pre LT: pre liver transplantation.</p

Flow chart.

<p>LT: Liver transplantation.</p

Evolution of platelet functions in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation: A prospective exploration over a month - Fig 3

<p><b>Boxplots at different time points for (A) 10 μM ADP-induced platelet aggregation, (B) 1.5 mM arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation, (C) 20 μM TRAP-induced platelet aggregation, (D) 1 mg/mL ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination, (E) platelet microvesicles as a % of total platelet count, (F) soluble CD62P.</b> Horizontal lines show median values and the 25–75 percentiles. Pre LT: pre liver transplantation.</p