6 research outputs found

    ΠŸΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ носнС ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π΅ са Ρ‚Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ опструкционих симптома ΠΈ карактСристикама ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡƒΡ…Π° ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· носну Π΄ΡƒΠΏΡ™Ρƒ

    Get PDF
    To investigate the association between the nasal septal deviation (NSD) morphology with nasal airway obstruction (NAO) symptom severity and the nasal airflow parameters. Methods: The study included 225 patients with diagnosed NSD. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire was validated and cross-culturally adapted for the Serbian population and applied for the NAO assessment. Patients were examined by computed tomography (CT). CT images were used to classify NSD according to Mladina's classification and generate eight 3D computational models of the nasal cavity (one model without NSD, seven models representing each Mladina's NSD type). Inspiration was simulated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method and analyzed through CFD parameters (airflow partitioning, velocity, wall shear stress, pressure, nasal resistance (NR), heat flux (HF), turbulent kinetic energy (k), and airflow pattern). The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Results: Although NOSE scores differed between patients with various Mladina's NSD types, the differences were not confirmed as statistically significant (B=0.837, p=0.261). There was no significant link between NSD types and NAO severity after applying additional morphology-based NSD classifications. CFD analysis showed that Mladina's NSD types induce various side asymmetry in all CFD parameters. CFD parameters that significantly correlated with the NOSE scores were: side asymmetry in NR (R=0.762, p=0.028), HF on the narrow nasal passage (R=-0.732, p=0.039), and ipsilateral k (R=-0.723, p=.043). Conclusions: NSD morphology could not predict NAO severity. Side asymmetry in NR, reduction in HF and k in the narrow nasal passage may contribute to the NSD-related NAO perception.испитати повСзаност Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ носнС ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π΅ (Π”ΠΠŸ) са Ρ‚Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ опструкционих симптома ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡƒΡ…Π° ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· носну Π΄ΡƒΠΏΡ™Ρƒ. ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄: Π£ ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ јС учСствовало 225 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° са Π΄ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π”ΠΠŸ. Π£ΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π½ΠΈΠΊ "Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)" јС Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ ΠΈ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ Π·Π° српску ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡšΠ΅Π½ Π·Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Ρƒ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π΅ опструкционих симптома. Π‘Π½ΠΈΠΌΡ†ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° са Π°ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ˜ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρƒ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ„ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ (КВ) ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡˆΡ›Π΅Π½ΠΈ су Π·Π° ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡ„ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ Π”ΠΠŸ ΠΏΠΎ Младининим ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡƒΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·Ρ€Π°Π΄Ρƒ осам ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ˜ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° носнС Π΄ΡƒΠΏΡ™Π΅ (јСдан ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» Π±Π΅Π· Π”ΠΠŸ, сСдам ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π·Π° сваки Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏ Π”ΠΠŸ ΠΏΠΎ Младини). ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ˜ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ„Π»ΡƒΠΈΠ΄Π° (ΠšΠ”Π€) симулирано јС ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈ су ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡƒΡ…Π° ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· нос (Π΄ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ±ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΡƒΠ΄Π°Ρ…Π½ΡƒΡ‚ΠΎΠ³ Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡƒΡ…Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ дСснС ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²Π΅ странС, Π±Ρ€Π·ΠΈΠ½Π°, смичући Π½Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ½, притисак, ΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΠΎΡ€, Ρ‚ΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΈ флукс (Π’Π€), Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π±ΡƒΠ»Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½Π° ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π³ΠΈΡ˜Π° (Π’ΠšΠ•) ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Π°Ρ† ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠ°). Π”ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈ су Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ€Π°Ρ˜ΡƒΡ›ΠΈΠΌ статистичким тСстовима. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ: Иако су ΡƒΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π½Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρƒ NOSE скоровима ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ Младининим Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° Π”ΠΠŸ, истС нису Π±ΠΈΠ»Π΅ статистички Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Ρ˜Π½Π΅ (B=0.837, p=0.261). Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΡ’Π΅ нијС Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° статистичка Π²Π΅Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ NOSE скорова ΠΈ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π”ΠΠŸ класификованих ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡƒΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ°. ΠšΠ”Π€ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° јС ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΠ΅ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρƒ свим ΠšΠ”Π€ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ ΠœΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π”ΠΠŸ. ΠšΠ”Π€ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ који су Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Ρ˜Π½ΠΎ статистички ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΈ са NOSE скоровима су Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π° Ρƒ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΠΎΡ€Ρƒ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ дСснС ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²Π΅ странС (R=0.762, p=0.028), Π’Π€ (R=-0.732, p=0.039) ΠΈ Π’ΠšΠ• (R=-0.723, p=.043) Π½Π° страни ΡΡƒΠΆΠ΅ΡšΠ°. Π—Π°ΠΊΡ™ΡƒΡ‡Π°ΠΊ: НијС ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ›Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½Ρƒ опструкционих симптома Π½Π° основу ΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ Π”ΠΠŸ. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π° Ρƒ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΠΎΡ€Ρƒ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ страна носнС Π΄ΡƒΠΏΡ™Π΅ ΡƒΠ·Ρ€ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π”ΠΠŸ, Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΡƒΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π’Π€ ΠΈ Π’ΠšΠ• Π½Π° страни ΡΡƒΠΆΠ΅ΡšΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρƒ Π±ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ›Π°Ρ˜ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅

    Side asymmetry in nasal resistance correlate with nasal obstruction severity in patients with septal deformities: Computational fluid dynamics study

    Get PDF
    Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between side asymmetry in nasal resistance (NR) and severity of the nasal airway obstruction (NAO) in patients with different types of nasal septal deformity (NSD). Design Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study. Setting The study was conducted in a tertiary medical centre. Participants The study included 232 patients, who were referred to the CT examination of the paranasal sinuses. Exclusion criteria were sinonasal and respiratory diseases that may interfere with the nasal obstruction. The presence and the type of NSD were recorded according to the Mladina's classification. Main outcome measures The presence and severity of NAO in each patient were assessed by NOSE questionnaire. Eight computational models of the nasal cavity were created from CT scans. Models represented seven Mladina's NSD types and a straight septum of a symptomless patient. CFD calculated airflow partitioning and NR for each nasal passage. Side differences in NR were calculated by the equation increment NR = NRleft - NRright. The relationship between NOSE scores, airflow partitioning and side differences in NR was explored using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results Mladina's types of NSD showed differences in airflow partitioning and the degree of side asymmetry in NR. A significant positive correlation was detected between side differences in NR and NOSE scores (R = .762, P = .028). A significant negative correlation was found between the per cent of unilateral airflow and NR (R = -.524, P = .037). Conclusions Our results demonstrated that side asymmetry in NR could explain differences in NAO severity related to the NSD type.This is the peer-reviewed version of the article: JanoviΔ‡, N.; CociΔ‡, A.; StameniΔ‡, M.; JanoviΔ‡, A.; ĐuriΔ‡, M. Side Asymmetry in Nasal Resistance Correlate with Nasal Obstruction Severity in Patients with Septal Deformities: Computational Fluid Dynamics Study. Clinical Otolaryngology 2020. [https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13563

    ΠŸΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ носнС ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π΅ са Ρ‚Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ опструкционих симптома ΠΈ карактСристикама ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡƒΡ…Π° ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· носну Π΄ΡƒΠΏΡ™Ρƒ

    No full text
    To investigate the association between the nasal septal deviation (NSD) morphology with nasal airway obstruction (NAO) symptom severity and the nasal airflow parameters. Methods: The study included 225 patients with diagnosed NSD. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire was validated and cross-culturally adapted for the Serbian population and applied for the NAO assessment. Patients were examined by computed tomography (CT). CT images were used to classify NSD according to Mladina's classification and generate eight 3D computational models of the nasal cavity (one model without NSD, seven models representing each Mladina's NSD type). Inspiration was simulated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method and analyzed through CFD parameters (airflow partitioning, velocity, wall shear stress, pressure, nasal resistance (NR), heat flux (HF), turbulent kinetic energy (k), and airflow pattern). The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Results: Although NOSE scores differed between patients with various Mladina's NSD types, the differences were not confirmed as statistically significant (B=0.837, p=0.261). There was no significant link between NSD types and NAO severity after applying additional morphology-based NSD classifications. CFD analysis showed that Mladina's NSD types induce various side asymmetry in all CFD parameters. CFD parameters that significantly correlated with the NOSE scores were: side asymmetry in NR (R=0.762, p=0.028), HF on the narrow nasal passage (R=-0.732, p=0.039), and ipsilateral k (R=-0.723, p=.043). Conclusions: NSD morphology could not predict NAO severity. Side asymmetry in NR, reduction in HF and k in the narrow nasal passage may contribute to the NSD-related NAO perception.испитати повСзаност Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ носнС ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π΅ (Π”ΠΠŸ) са Ρ‚Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ опструкционих симптома ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡƒΡ…Π° ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· носну Π΄ΡƒΠΏΡ™Ρƒ. ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄: Π£ ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΡ˜ΠΈ јС учСствовало 225 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° са Π΄ΠΈΡ˜Π°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π”ΠΠŸ. Π£ΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π½ΠΈΠΊ "Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)" јС Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ ΠΈ ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ Π·Π° српску ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡšΠ΅Π½ Π·Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Ρƒ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π΅ опструкционих симптома. Π‘Π½ΠΈΠΌΡ†ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° са Π°ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ˜ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρƒ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ„ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ (КВ) ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡˆΡ›Π΅Π½ΠΈ су Π·Π° ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡ„ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Ρƒ Π”ΠΠŸ ΠΏΠΎ Младининим ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡƒΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·Ρ€Π°Π΄Ρƒ осам ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ˜ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° носнС Π΄ΡƒΠΏΡ™Π΅ (јСдан ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» Π±Π΅Π· Π”ΠΠŸ, сСдам ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π·Π° сваки Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏ Π”ΠΠŸ ΠΏΠΎ Младини). ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ˜ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ„Π»ΡƒΠΈΠ΄Π° (ΠšΠ”Π€) симулирано јС ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈ су ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡƒΡ…Π° ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ· нос (Π΄ΠΈΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ±ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° ΡƒΠ΄Π°Ρ…Π½ΡƒΡ‚ΠΎΠ³ Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡƒΡ…Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ дСснС ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²Π΅ странС, Π±Ρ€Π·ΠΈΠ½Π°, смичући Π½Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ½, притисак, ΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΠΎΡ€, Ρ‚ΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΈ флукс (Π’Π€), Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π±ΡƒΠ»Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½Π° ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΠΊΠ° Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π³ΠΈΡ˜Π° (Π’ΠšΠ•) ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Π°Ρ† ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠ°). Π”ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ˜Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈ су Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ€Π°Ρ˜ΡƒΡ›ΠΈΠΌ статистичким тСстовима. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ: Иако су ΡƒΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π½Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρƒ NOSE скоровима ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ Младининим Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° Π”ΠΠŸ, истС нису Π±ΠΈΠ»Π΅ статистички Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Ρ˜Π½Π΅ (B=0.837, p=0.261). Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΡ’Π΅ нијС Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° статистичка Π²Π΅Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ NOSE скорова ΠΈ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π”ΠΠŸ класификованих ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜ΡƒΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ°. ΠšΠ”Π€ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° јС ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ˜Π°ΡšΠ΅ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρƒ свим ΠšΠ”Π€ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ ΠœΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ… Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π”ΠΠŸ. ΠšΠ”Π€ ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ који су Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Ρ˜Π½ΠΎ статистички ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΈ са NOSE скоровима су Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π° Ρƒ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΠΎΡ€Ρƒ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ дСснС ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²Π΅ странС (R=0.762, p=0.028), Π’Π€ (R=-0.732, p=0.039) ΠΈ Π’ΠšΠ• (R=-0.723, p=.043) Π½Π° страни ΡΡƒΠΆΠ΅ΡšΠ°. Π—Π°ΠΊΡ™ΡƒΡ‡Π°ΠΊ: НијС ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ›Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½Ρƒ опструкционих симптома Π½Π° основу ΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ˜Π΅ Π”ΠΠŸ. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ˜Π° Ρƒ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΠΎΡ€Ρƒ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ’Ρƒ страна носнС Π΄ΡƒΠΏΡ™Π΅ ΡƒΠ·Ρ€ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π”ΠΠŸ, Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΡƒΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π° Π’Π€ ΠΈ Π’ΠšΠ• Π½Π° страни ΡΡƒΠΆΠ΅ΡšΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρƒ Π±ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ›Π°Ρ˜ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ˜Π΅

    Side asymmetry in nasal resistance correlate with nasal obstruction severity in patients with septal deformities: Computational fluid dynamics study

    No full text
    Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between side asymmetry in nasal resistance (NR) and severity of the nasal airway obstruction (NAO) in patients with different types of nasal septal deformity (NSD). Design Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study. Setting The study was conducted in a tertiary medical centre. Participants The study included 232 patients, who were referred to the CT examination of the paranasal sinuses. Exclusion criteria were sinonasal and respiratory diseases that may interfere with the nasal obstruction. The presence and the type of NSD were recorded according to the Mladina's classification. Main outcome measures The presence and severity of NAO in each patient were assessed by NOSE questionnaire. Eight computational models of the nasal cavity were created from CT scans. Models represented seven Mladina's NSD types and a straight septum of a symptomless patient. CFD calculated airflow partitioning and NR for each nasal passage. Side differences in NR were calculated by the equation increment NR = NRleft - NRright. The relationship between NOSE scores, airflow partitioning and side differences in NR was explored using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results Mladina's types of NSD showed differences in airflow partitioning and the degree of side asymmetry in NR. A significant positive correlation was detected between side differences in NR and NOSE scores (R = .762, P = .028). A significant negative correlation was found between the per cent of unilateral airflow and NR (R = -.524, P = .037). Conclusions Our results demonstrated that side asymmetry in NR could explain differences in NAO severity related to the NSD type

    Side asymmetry in nasal resistance correlate with nasal obstruction severity in patients with septal deformities: Computational fluid dynamics study

    No full text
    Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between side asymmetry in nasal resistance (NR) and severity of the nasal airway obstruction (NAO) in patients with different types of nasal septal deformity (NSD). Design Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study. Setting The study was conducted in a tertiary medical centre. Participants The study included 232 patients, who were referred to the CT examination of the paranasal sinuses. Exclusion criteria were sinonasal and respiratory diseases that may interfere with the nasal obstruction. The presence and the type of NSD were recorded according to the Mladina's classification. Main outcome measures The presence and severity of NAO in each patient were assessed by NOSE questionnaire. Eight computational models of the nasal cavity were created from CT scans. Models represented seven Mladina's NSD types and a straight septum of a symptomless patient. CFD calculated airflow partitioning and NR for each nasal passage. Side differences in NR were calculated by the equation increment NR = NRleft - NRright. The relationship between NOSE scores, airflow partitioning and side differences in NR was explored using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results Mladina's types of NSD showed differences in airflow partitioning and the degree of side asymmetry in NR. A significant positive correlation was detected between side differences in NR and NOSE scores (R = .762, P = .028). A significant negative correlation was found between the per cent of unilateral airflow and NR (R = -.524, P = .037). Conclusions Our results demonstrated that side asymmetry in NR could explain differences in NAO severity related to the NSD type.Peer-reviewed manuscript: [http://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2527

    Exploitation of neglected horseradish peroxidase izoenzymes for dye decolorization

    No full text
    Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is enzyme first described more than 200 years ago and yet there are still some aspects of this potent enzyme to be tackled. Researchers were focused on most abundant isoenzyme HRP CIA while remaining, particularly anionic isoenzymes were discarded in purification process. This work describes exploitation of those isoenzymes for removal of recalcitrant pollutants such as reactive dyes. Results demonstrated that not only these enzymes can decolorize dyes but also in some cases anionic forms are more efficient than commercially produced cationic HRP form. Enzyme concentration of 0.14 U ml(-1) was found to provide maximum dye removal at optimized reaction conditions with dye concentration of 30 mg I-1. Majority of dyes tested were successfully decolorized at pH 5 or 7 while some dyes like Orange 2 and Reactive black 5 are decolorized most efficiently at pH 9. Anionic isoenzymes act by disrupting chromophore of Reactive black 5 while cationic HRP oxidize dye but leaves chromophore present. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
    corecore