6 research outputs found
ΠΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡΡ Π° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ· Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Ρ Π΄ΡΠΏΡΡ
To investigate the association between the nasal septal deviation (NSD) morphology with nasal airway obstruction (NAO) symptom severity and the nasal airflow parameters. Methods: The study included 225 patients with diagnosed NSD. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire was validated and cross-culturally adapted for the Serbian population and applied for the NAO assessment. Patients were examined by computed tomography (CT). CT images were used to classify NSD according to Mladina's classification and generate eight 3D computational models of the nasal cavity (one model without NSD, seven models representing each Mladina's NSD type). Inspiration was simulated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method and analyzed through CFD parameters (airflow partitioning, velocity, wall shear stress, pressure, nasal resistance (NR), heat flux (HF), turbulent kinetic energy (k), and airflow pattern). The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Results: Although NOSE scores differed between patients with various Mladina's NSD types, the differences were not confirmed as statistically significant (B=0.837, p=0.261). There was no significant link between NSD types and NAO severity after applying additional morphology-based NSD classifications. CFD analysis showed that Mladina's NSD types induce various side asymmetry in all CFD parameters. CFD parameters that significantly correlated with the NOSE scores were: side asymmetry in NR (R=0.762, p=0.028), HF on the narrow nasal passage (R=-0.732, p=0.039), and ipsilateral k (R=-0.723, p=.043). Conclusions: NSD morphology could not predict NAO severity. Side asymmetry in NR, reduction in HF and k in the narrow nasal passage may contribute to the NSD-related NAO perception.ΠΈΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ (ΠΠΠ) ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡΡ
Π° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ· Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Ρ Π΄ΡΠΏΡΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄: Π£ ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ 225 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΈΡΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΠΠ. Π£ΠΏΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ "Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)" ΡΠ΅ Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ Π·Π° ΡΡΠΏΡΠΊΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ°. Π‘Π½ΠΈΠΌΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠ° Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ (ΠΠ’) ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ Π·Π° ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΠΠ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π΄Ρ ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ Π΄ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ (ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°Π½ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» Π±Π΅Π· ΠΠΠ, ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π·Π° ΡΠ²Π°ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏ ΠΠΠ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ). ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΡΠΈΠ΄Π° (ΠΠΠ€) ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡΡ
Π° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ· Π½ΠΎΡ (Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΄Π°Ρ
Π½ΡΡΠΎΠ³ Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡΡ
Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅, Π±ΡΠ·ΠΈΠ½Π°, ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ½, ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ°ΠΊ, ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡ, ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΠΊΡ (Π’Π€), ΡΡΡΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΡΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ° (Π’ΠΠ) ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π°Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ°). ΠΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ°. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ: ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ NOSE ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΠΠ, ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π±ΠΈΠ»Π΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½Π΅ (B=0.837, p=0.261). Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π²Π΅Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ NOSE ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΠΠ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ°. ΠΠΠ€ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠΌ ΠΠΠ€ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΠΠ. ΠΠΠ€ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ° NOSE ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΡΡ Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ° Ρ ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅ (R=0.762, p=0.028), Π’Π€ (R=-0.732, p=0.039) ΠΈ Π’ΠΠ (R=-0.723, p=.043) Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ°. ΠΠ°ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊ: ΠΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ° Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΠΠ. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ° Ρ ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ Π΄ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ ΡΠ·ΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΠΠΠ, ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ° Π’Π€ ΠΈ Π’ΠΠ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ Π±ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅
Side asymmetry in nasal resistance correlate with nasal obstruction severity in patients with septal deformities: Computational fluid dynamics study
Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between side asymmetry in nasal resistance (NR) and severity of the nasal airway obstruction (NAO) in patients with different types of nasal septal deformity (NSD). Design Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study. Setting The study was conducted in a tertiary medical centre. Participants The study included 232 patients, who were referred to the CT examination of the paranasal sinuses. Exclusion criteria were sinonasal and respiratory diseases that may interfere with the nasal obstruction. The presence and the type of NSD were recorded according to the Mladina's classification. Main outcome measures The presence and severity of NAO in each patient were assessed by NOSE questionnaire. Eight computational models of the nasal cavity were created from CT scans. Models represented seven Mladina's NSD types and a straight septum of a symptomless patient. CFD calculated airflow partitioning and NR for each nasal passage. Side differences in NR were calculated by the equation increment NR = NRleft - NRright. The relationship between NOSE scores, airflow partitioning and side differences in NR was explored using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results Mladina's types of NSD showed differences in airflow partitioning and the degree of side asymmetry in NR. A significant positive correlation was detected between side differences in NR and NOSE scores (R = .762, P = .028). A significant negative correlation was found between the per cent of unilateral airflow and NR (R = -.524, P = .037). Conclusions Our results demonstrated that side asymmetry in NR could explain differences in NAO severity related to the NSD type.This is the peer-reviewed version of the article: JanoviΔ, N.; CociΔ, A.; StameniΔ, M.; JanoviΔ, A.; ΔuriΔ, M. Side Asymmetry in Nasal Resistance Correlate with Nasal Obstruction Severity in Patients with Septal Deformities: Computational Fluid Dynamics Study. Clinical Otolaryngology 2020. [https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13563
ΠΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡΡ Π° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ· Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Ρ Π΄ΡΠΏΡΡ
To investigate the association between the nasal septal deviation (NSD) morphology with nasal airway obstruction (NAO) symptom severity and the nasal airflow parameters. Methods: The study included 225 patients with diagnosed NSD. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire was validated and cross-culturally adapted for the Serbian population and applied for the NAO assessment. Patients were examined by computed tomography (CT). CT images were used to classify NSD according to Mladina's classification and generate eight 3D computational models of the nasal cavity (one model without NSD, seven models representing each Mladina's NSD type). Inspiration was simulated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method and analyzed through CFD parameters (airflow partitioning, velocity, wall shear stress, pressure, nasal resistance (NR), heat flux (HF), turbulent kinetic energy (k), and airflow pattern). The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Results: Although NOSE scores differed between patients with various Mladina's NSD types, the differences were not confirmed as statistically significant (B=0.837, p=0.261). There was no significant link between NSD types and NAO severity after applying additional morphology-based NSD classifications. CFD analysis showed that Mladina's NSD types induce various side asymmetry in all CFD parameters. CFD parameters that significantly correlated with the NOSE scores were: side asymmetry in NR (R=0.762, p=0.028), HF on the narrow nasal passage (R=-0.732, p=0.039), and ipsilateral k (R=-0.723, p=.043). Conclusions: NSD morphology could not predict NAO severity. Side asymmetry in NR, reduction in HF and k in the narrow nasal passage may contribute to the NSD-related NAO perception.ΠΈΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ (ΠΠΠ) ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡΡ
Π° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ· Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Ρ Π΄ΡΠΏΡΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄: Π£ ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ 225 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΈΡΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΠΠ. Π£ΠΏΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ "Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)" ΡΠ΅ Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ Π·Π° ΡΡΠΏΡΠΊΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ°. Π‘Π½ΠΈΠΌΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠ° Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ (ΠΠ’) ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ Π·Π° ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΠΠ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π΄Ρ ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ Π΄ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ (ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°Π½ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» Π±Π΅Π· ΠΠΠ, ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π·Π° ΡΠ²Π°ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏ ΠΠΠ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ). ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΡΠΈΠ΄Π° (ΠΠΠ€) ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ° Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡΡ
Π° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ· Π½ΠΎΡ (Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΄Π°Ρ
Π½ΡΡΠΎΠ³ Π²Π°Π·Π΄ΡΡ
Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅, Π±ΡΠ·ΠΈΠ½Π°, ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ½, ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ°ΠΊ, ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡ, ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΠΊΡ (Π’Π€), ΡΡΡΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΡΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ° (Π’ΠΠ) ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π°Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ°). ΠΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ°. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ: ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ NOSE ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΠΠ, ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π±ΠΈΠ»Π΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½Π΅ (B=0.837, p=0.261). Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π²Π΅Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ NOSE ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΠΠ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ°. ΠΠΠ€ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠΌ ΠΠΠ€ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΠΠ. ΠΠΠ€ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ° NOSE ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΡΡ Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ° Ρ ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΈ Π»Π΅Π²Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅ (R=0.762, p=0.028), Π’Π€ (R=-0.732, p=0.039) ΠΈ Π’ΠΠ (R=-0.723, p=.043) Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ°. ΠΠ°ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊ: ΠΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ° Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΠΠ. ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ° Ρ ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ Π΄ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ ΡΠ·ΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΠΠΠ, ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ° Π’Π€ ΠΈ Π’ΠΠ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ Π±ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅
Side asymmetry in nasal resistance correlate with nasal obstruction severity in patients with septal deformities: Computational fluid dynamics study
Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between side asymmetry in nasal resistance (NR) and severity of the nasal airway obstruction (NAO) in patients with different types of nasal septal deformity (NSD). Design Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study. Setting The study was conducted in a tertiary medical centre. Participants The study included 232 patients, who were referred to the CT examination of the paranasal sinuses. Exclusion criteria were sinonasal and respiratory diseases that may interfere with the nasal obstruction. The presence and the type of NSD were recorded according to the Mladina's classification. Main outcome measures The presence and severity of NAO in each patient were assessed by NOSE questionnaire. Eight computational models of the nasal cavity were created from CT scans. Models represented seven Mladina's NSD types and a straight septum of a symptomless patient. CFD calculated airflow partitioning and NR for each nasal passage. Side differences in NR were calculated by the equation increment NR = NRleft - NRright. The relationship between NOSE scores, airflow partitioning and side differences in NR was explored using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results Mladina's types of NSD showed differences in airflow partitioning and the degree of side asymmetry in NR. A significant positive correlation was detected between side differences in NR and NOSE scores (R = .762, P = .028). A significant negative correlation was found between the per cent of unilateral airflow and NR (R = -.524, P = .037). Conclusions Our results demonstrated that side asymmetry in NR could explain differences in NAO severity related to the NSD type
Side asymmetry in nasal resistance correlate with nasal obstruction severity in patients with septal deformities: Computational fluid dynamics study
Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between side asymmetry in nasal resistance (NR) and severity of the nasal airway obstruction (NAO) in patients with different types of nasal septal deformity (NSD). Design Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study. Setting The study was conducted in a tertiary medical centre. Participants The study included 232 patients, who were referred to the CT examination of the paranasal sinuses. Exclusion criteria were sinonasal and respiratory diseases that may interfere with the nasal obstruction. The presence and the type of NSD were recorded according to the Mladina's classification. Main outcome measures The presence and severity of NAO in each patient were assessed by NOSE questionnaire. Eight computational models of the nasal cavity were created from CT scans. Models represented seven Mladina's NSD types and a straight septum of a symptomless patient. CFD calculated airflow partitioning and NR for each nasal passage. Side differences in NR were calculated by the equation increment NR = NRleft - NRright. The relationship between NOSE scores, airflow partitioning and side differences in NR was explored using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results Mladina's types of NSD showed differences in airflow partitioning and the degree of side asymmetry in NR. A significant positive correlation was detected between side differences in NR and NOSE scores (R = .762, P = .028). A significant negative correlation was found between the per cent of unilateral airflow and NR (R = -.524, P = .037). Conclusions Our results demonstrated that side asymmetry in NR could explain differences in NAO severity related to the NSD type.Peer-reviewed manuscript: [http://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2527
Exploitation of neglected horseradish peroxidase izoenzymes for dye decolorization
Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is enzyme first described more than 200 years ago and yet there are still some aspects of this potent enzyme to be tackled. Researchers were focused on most abundant isoenzyme HRP CIA while remaining, particularly anionic isoenzymes were discarded in purification process. This work describes exploitation of those isoenzymes for removal of recalcitrant pollutants such as reactive dyes. Results demonstrated that not only these enzymes can decolorize dyes but also in some cases anionic forms are more efficient than commercially produced cationic HRP form. Enzyme concentration of 0.14 U ml(-1) was found to provide maximum dye removal at optimized reaction conditions with dye concentration of 30 mg I-1. Majority of dyes tested were successfully decolorized at pH 5 or 7 while some dyes like Orange 2 and Reactive black 5 are decolorized most efficiently at pH 9. Anionic isoenzymes act by disrupting chromophore of Reactive black 5 while cationic HRP oxidize dye but leaves chromophore present. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved