Trial flow diagram.

<p>Trial flow diagram.</p

Response fractions and primary outcomes at two years in intervention and comparison communities.

<p>Response fractions and primary outcomes at two years in intervention and comparison communities.</p

Schematic overview of conceptual thinking behind PRISM.

<p>Schematic overview of conceptual thinking behind PRISM.</p

Characteristics of women responding at two years in intervention and comparison communities, compared with all women giving birth in PRISM communities.

<p>* As at time of index birth.</p>#<p>As at time of second survey.</p><p>AUD = Australian dollar.</p><p>OSB: ES country = Overseas-born English-speaking country.</p><p>OSB:NES country = Overseas-born non-English-speaking country.</p><p>VPDC = Victorian Perinatal Data Collection.</p

Women's reports two years after birth about information received, primary care support, friendships, community support and partner support in intervention and comparison communities.

<p>[Difference: −0.034,SE_adj: 0.06, p-value: 0.58].</p

EPDS and SF-36 mean scores two years after birth for selected pre-specified subgroups.

<p>*Scales adjusted for age/sex distribution of PRISM population, factor loadings and standard deviation using Australian National Health Survey values.</p><p>ABS. National Health Survey. SF-36 Population Norms Australia: Australian Bureau Statistics, Commonwealth of Australia Catalogue No. 4399.0; 1997.</p

Probable depression (EPDS≥13 and mean scores) and SF-36 mental and physical component summary (MCS & PCS) scores and sub-scales, two years after birth.

<p>*Scales adjusted for age/sex distribution of PRISM population, factor loadings and standard deviation using Australian National Health Survey values.</p><p>ABS. National Health Survey. SF-36 Population Norms Australia: Australian Bureau Statistics, Commonwealth of Australia Catalogue No. 4399.0; 1997.</p

Additional file 1: of Equity of access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations: the IMPACT international online survey of innovations

IMPACT Study Online Survey Questionnaire. Full Online Survey Questionnaire. (PDF 178 kb

Additional file 1 of Economic evaluation of a Decision Support Tool to guide intensity of mental health care in general practice: the Link-me pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Additional file 1

Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

Background: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. Methods: Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. Results: Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. Conclusion: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing