5 research outputs found
The Common Core and the Future of Student Assessment in Ohio
Ohio committed itself to embracing higher standards that cross state lines when it joined 45 other states and the District of Columbia in adopting the Common Core standards in math and English language arts (ELA) in June 2010
Rehabilitation versus surgical reconstruction for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL SNNAP): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common debilitating injury that can cause instability of the knee. We aimed to investigate the best management strategy between reconstructive surgery and non-surgical treatment for patients with a non-acute ACL injury and persistent symptoms of instability.MethodsWe did a pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial in 29 secondary care National Health Service orthopaedic units in the UK. Patients with symptomatic knee problems (instability) consistent with an ACL injury were eligible. We excluded patients with meniscal pathology with characteristics that indicate immediate surgery. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer to either surgery (reconstruction) or rehabilitation (physiotherapy but with subsequent reconstruction permitted if instability persisted after treatment), stratified by site and baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scoreâ4 domain version (KOOS4). This management design represented normal practice. The primary outcome was KOOS4 at 18 months after randomisation. The principal analyses were intention-to-treat based, with KOOS4 results analysed using linear regression. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN10110685, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02980367.FindingsBetween Feb 1, 2017, and April 12, 2020, we recruited 316 patients. 156 (49%) participants were randomly assigned to the surgical reconstruction group and 160 (51%) to the rehabilitation group. Mean KOOS4 at 18 months was 73·0 (SD 18·3) in the surgical group and 64·6 (21·6) in the rehabilitation group. The adjusted mean difference was 7·9 (95% CI 2·5â13·2; p=0·0053) in favour of surgical management. 65 (41%) of 160 patients allocated to rehabilitation underwent subsequent surgery according to protocol within 18 months. 43 (28%) of 156 patients allocated to surgery did not receive their allocated treatment. We found no differences between groups in the proportion of intervention-related complications.InterpretationSurgical reconstruction as a management strategy for patients with non-acute ACL injury with persistent symptoms of instability was clinically superior and more cost-effective in comparison with rehabilitation management
Rehabilitation versus surgical reconstruction for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL SNNAP): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Background
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common debilitating injury that can cause instability of the knee. We aimed to investigate the best management strategy between reconstructive surgery and non-surgical treatment for patients with a non-acute ACL injury and persistent symptoms of instability.
Methods
We did a pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial in 29 secondary care National Health Service orthopaedic units in the UK. Patients with symptomatic knee problems (instability) consistent with an ACL injury were eligible. We excluded patients with meniscal pathology with characteristics that indicate immediate surgery. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer to either surgery (reconstruction) or rehabilitation (physiotherapy but with subsequent reconstruction permitted if instability persisted after treatment), stratified by site and baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scoreâ4 domain version (KOOS4). This management design represented normal practice. The primary outcome was KOOS4 at 18 months after randomisation. The principal analyses were intention-to-treat based, with KOOS4 results analysed using linear regression. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN10110685, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02980367.
Findings
Between Feb 1, 2017, and April 12, 2020, we recruited 316 patients. 156 (49%) participants were randomly assigned to the surgical reconstruction group and 160 (51%) to the rehabilitation group. Mean KOOS4 at 18 months was 73·0 (SD 18·3) in the surgical group and 64·6 (21·6) in the rehabilitation group. The adjusted mean difference was 7·9 (95% CI 2·5â13·2; p=0·0053) in favour of surgical management. 65 (41%) of 160 patients allocated to rehabilitation underwent subsequent surgery according to protocol within 18 months. 43 (28%) of 156 patients allocated to surgery did not receive their allocated treatment. We found no differences between groups in the proportion of intervention-related complications.
Interpretation
Surgical reconstruction as a management strategy for patients with non-acute ACL injury with persistent symptoms of instability was clinically superior and more cost-effective in comparison with rehabilitation management
Effects of urbanisation on macroalgae and sessile invertebrates in southeast Australian estuaries
Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of COVID -19: coreporting of common outcomes from PAN-COVID and AAP-SONPM registries
Objective
Few large cohort studies have reported data on maternal, fetal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâCoVâ2) infection in pregnancy. We report the outcome of infected pregnancies from a collaboration formed early during the pandemic between the investigators of two registries, the UK and Global Pregnancy and Neonatal outcomes in COVIDâ19 (PANâCOVID) study and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Section on NeonatalâPerinatal Medicine (SONPM) National Perinatal COVIDâ19 Registry.
Methods
This was an analysis of data from the PANâCOVID registry (1 January to 25 July 2020), which includes pregnancies with suspected or confirmed maternal SARSâCoVâ2 infection at any stage in pregnancy, and the AAPâSONPM National Perinatal COVIDâ19 registry (4 April to 8 August 2020), which includes pregnancies with positive maternal testing for SARSâCoVâ2 from 14âdays before delivery to 3âdays after delivery. The registries collected data on maternal, fetal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes. The PANâCOVID results are presented overall for pregnancies with suspected or confirmed SARSâCoVâ2 infection and separately in those with confirmed infection.
Results
We report on 4005 pregnant women with suspected or confirmed SARSâCoVâ2 infection (1606 from PANâCOVID and 2399 from AAPâSONPM). For obstetric outcomes, in PANâCOVID overall and in those with confirmed infection in PANâCOVID and AAPâSONPM, respectively, maternal death occurred in 0.5%, 0.5% and 0.2% of cases, early neonatal death in 0.2%, 0.3% and 0.3% of cases and stillbirth in 0.5%, 0.6% and 0.4% of cases. Delivery was preterm (<â37âweeks' gestation) in 12.0% of all women in PANâCOVID, in 16.1% of those women with confirmed infection in PANâCOVID and in 15.7% of women in AAPâSONPM. Extreme preterm delivery (<â27âweeks' gestation) occurred in 0.5% of cases in PANâCOVID and 0.3% in AAPâSONPM. Neonatal SARSâCoVâ2 infection was reported in 0.9% of all deliveries in PANâCOVID overall, in 2.0% in those with confirmed infection in PANâCOVID and in 1.8% in AAPâSONPM; the proportions of neonates tested were 9.5%, 20.7% and 87.2%, respectively. The rates of a smallâforâgestationalâage (SGA) neonate were 8.2% in PANâCOVID overall, 9.7% in those with confirmed infection and 9.6% in AAPâSONPM. Mean gestationalâageâadjusted birthâweight Zâscores were â0.03 in PANâCOVID and â0.18 in AAPâSONPM.
Conclusions
The findings from the UK and USA registries of pregnancies with SARSâCoVâ2 infection were remarkably concordant. Preterm delivery affected a higher proportion of women than expected based on historical and contemporaneous national data. The proportions of pregnancies affected by stillbirth, a SGA infant or early neonatal death were comparable to those in historical and contemporaneous UK and USA data. Although maternal death was uncommon, the rate was higher than expected based on UK and USA population data, which is likely explained by underascertainment of women affected by milder or asymptomatic infection in pregnancy in the PANâCOVID study, although not in the AAPâSONPM study. The data presented support strong guidance for enhanced precautions to prevent SARSâCoVâ2 infection in pregnancy, particularly in the context of increased risks of preterm delivery and maternal mortality, and for priority vaccination of pregnant women and women planning pregnancy. Copyright © 2021 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd