TSH-secreting pituitary tumors: two case reports and literature review

INTRODUÇÃO: Tumores hipofisários secretores de hormônio estimulante da tireoide (TSH), tireotropinomas, são raros e correspondem a menos de 2% de todos os adenomas da hipófise. Manifestam-se clinicamente com sintomas e sinais de tireotoxicose, eventualmente associados a sintomas compressivos, sobretudo visuais, devido ao efeito de massa do tumor. Esses tumores se caracterizam pela presença de níveis séricos elevados de hormônios tireoidianos e níveis séricos elevados, ou inapropriadamente normais, de TSH. Frequentemente, ao diagnóstico, há relato de tratamento prévio cirúrgico, medicamentoso e/ou ablativo, por hipótese de hipertireoidismo primário por doença de Graves. OBJETIVO: Relatar dois casos de tireotropinomas acompanhados na Unidade de Neuroendocrinologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP) e revisar a literatura visando ao manejo desta afecção. CONCLUSÃO: Na presença de hormônios tireoidianos elevados e níveis de TSH inapropriadamente normais ou elevados, a possibilidade de adenoma hipofisário produtor de TSH deve ser considerada com vistas à realização da terapia adequada.INTRODUCTION: TSH-secreting pituitary adenomas are rare pituitary functioning tumors accounting for less than 2% of the pituitary adenomas. The clinical feature consists of thyrotoxicosis occasionally associated to tumoral symptoms due to mass effect. The biochemical feature consists of elevated thyroid hormones levels and normal or high TSH concentrations. This disease is often wrongly diagnosed as Grave's disease, and the ablative therapy is frequently conducted prior to the diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To report two cases followed in the Neuroendocrine Unit of Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo and to review the literature aiming at the management of this affection. CONCLUSION: In the presence of elevated thyroid hormone levels associated with inappropriate normal or increased TSH levels, the possibility of a TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma should be considered for the proper medical treatment

Brazilian multicenter study on pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly

Objective Investigate the therapeutic response of acromegaly patients to pegvisomant (PEGV) in a real-life, Brazilian multicenter study. Subjects and methods Characteristics of acromegaly patients treated with PEGV were reviewed at diagnosis, just before and during treatment. All patients with at least two IGF-I measurements on PEGV were included. Efficacy was defined as any normal IGF-I measurement during treatment. Safety data were reviewed. Predictors of response were determined by comparing controlled versus uncontrolled patients. Results 109 patients [61 women; median age at diagnosis 34 years; 95.3% macroadenomas] from 10 Brazilian centers were studied. Previous treatment included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (34%), somatostatin receptor ligands (99%), and cabergoline (67%). Before PEGV, median levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-I % of upper limit of normal were 4.3 µg/L, 613 ng/mL, and 209%, respectively. Pre-diabetes/diabetes was present in 48.6% and tumor remnant in 71% of patients. Initial dose was 10 mg/day in all except 4 cases, maximum dose was 30 mg/day, and median exposure time was 30.5 months. PEGV was used as monotherapy in 11% of cases. Normal IGF-I levels was obtained in 74.1% of patients. Glycemic control improved in 56.6% of patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes. Exposure time, pre-treatment GH and IGF-I levels were predictors of response. Tumor enlargement occurred in 6.5% and elevation of liver enzymes in 9.2%. PEGV was discontinued in 6 patients and 3 deaths unrelated to the drug were reported. Conclusions In a real-life scenario, PEGV is a highly effective and safe treatment for acromegaly patients not controlled with other therapies

Recommendations of Neuroendocrinology Department from Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism for diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly in Brazil

A acromegalia é uma doença associada à elevada morbidade e à redução da expectativa de vida. Em virtude do seu caráter insidioso e do seu não reconhecimento, o diagnóstico é frequentemente realizado com atraso, o que, associado às complicações relacionadas ao excesso do GH/IGF-I, determina elevada morbimortalidade. No entanto, um diagnóstico precoce e um tratamento efetivo minimizam a morbidade e normalizam a taxa de mortalidade. Nesta publicação, o objetivo do Departamento de Neuroendocrinologia da Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia é divulgar quando suspeitar clinicamente da acromegalia e como diagnosticá-la. Além disso, discute-se a maneira mais eficaz e segura de realizar o tratamento da acromegalia, enfatizando que este deve ser realizado em centros de referência. Assim, com base em dados publicados em periódicos de nível científico reconhecido e na experiência dos autores, são apresentadas as recomendações para o diagnóstico e tratamento da doença.Acromegaly is a disease associated with increased morbidity and reduced life expectancy. Because of its insidious character and its non-recognition, the diagnosis is often made with delay, which, along with the complications related to GH/IGF-I excess, determines high morbidity and mortality. However, an early diagnosis and an effective treatment reduce the morbidity and normalize the mortality rate. In this publication, the goal of Neuroendocrinology Department from Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism is to disclose which clinical set should arouse the suspicious of acromegaly and how to diagnose it. Furthermore, we discuss the most effective and safe approach to perform the treatment of acromegaly, emphasizing that it must be carried out in reference centers. Therefore, based on data published in journals with recognized scientific level and authors' experience, recommendations are presented for diagnosis and treatment of the disease

Acromegaly: correlation between expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes and response to octreotide-lar treatment

About one-third of acromegalics are resistant to the clinically available somatostatin analogs (SA). The resistance is related to density reduction or different expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR). This study analyzes SSTR`s expression in somatotrophinomas, comparing to SA response, hormonal levels, and tumor volume. We analyzed 39 somatotrophinomas; 49% were treated with SA. The most expressed SSTR was SSTR5, SSTR3, SSTR2, SSTR1, and SSTR4, respectively. SSTR1 and SSTR2 had higher expression in patients that had normalized GH and IGF-I. SSTR3 was more expressed in patients with tumor reduction. There was a positive correlation between the percentage of tumor reduction and SSTR1, SSTR2 and SSTR3 expression. Also, a positive correlation between SSTR2 mRNA expression and the immunohistochemical reactivity of SSTR2 was found. Our study confirmed the association between the SA response to GH and IGF-I and the SSTR2. Additionally, this finding was also demonstrated in relation to SSTR1

Long-Term Remission of Acromegaly after Octreotide Withdrawal Is an Uncommon and Frequently Unsustainable Event

Background: Long-term remission of acromegaly after somatostatin analog withdrawal has been reported in 18-42% of patients in studies with a relatively small number of patients using different inclusion and remission criteria. The objectives of this study were to establish the probability and predictive factors for short-and long-term remission [normal IGF-1 for age/sex: IGF-1 x upper limit of normal (ULN)] after octreotide long-acting release (LAR) withdrawal in a larger population of well-controlled patients with acromegaly (normal mean IGF-1 in the last 24 months). Methods: This is a prospective multicenter study in which 58 well-controlled patients with acromegaly receiving only octreotide LAR as a primary or postsurgical treatment were included in 14 university centers in Brazil. All patients had been on stable doses and dose intervals of octreotide LAR in the last year, and none had been submitted to radiotherapy. The main outcome measure was serum IGF-1 after 8 weeks (shortterm) and 60 weeks (long-term) of octreotide LAR withdrawal. Results: Seventeen of 58 patients (29%) were in remission in the short term, and only 4 patients achieved long-term remission after treatment withdrawal. The Kaplan-Meier estimated remission probability at 60 weeks was 7% and decreased to 5% at 72 weeks. The short-term remission rate was significantly higher (44%p = 0.017) in patients with pretreatment IGF-1 <2.4 x ULN. No other predictive factor for short-or long-term remission was found. Conclusion: Our results show that long-term remission of acromegaly afteroctreotide LAR withdrawal was an uncommon and frequently unsustainable event and do not support the recommendation of a systematic withdrawal of treatment in controlled patients. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, BaselCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Neuroendocrine Unit, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Neuroendocrine Unit, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Rio de Janeiro, Hosp Univ Clementino Fraga Filho, Endocrine Unit, Rio De Janeiro, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Ribeirao Preto, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Div Endocrinol, Grad Program Endocrinol, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Minas Gerais, Lab Endocrinol, Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilUniv Fed Pernambuco, Hosp Clin, Div Endocrinol, Recife, PE, BrazilNeuroendocrine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Universidade Federal de São PauloUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Hosp Clin, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Neuroendocrine Unit, Sao Paulo, BrazilCAPES: 528/11Web of Scienc

Brazilian multicenter study on pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly

Objective: Investigate the therapeutic response of acromegaly patients to pegvisomant (PEGV) in a real-life, Brazilian multicenter study. Subjects and methods: Characteristics of acromegaly patients treated with PEGV were reviewed at diagnosis, just before and during treatment. All patients with at least two IGF-I measurements on PEGV were included. Efficacy was defined as any normal IGF-I measurement during treatment. Safety data were reviewed. Predictors of response were determined by comparing controlled versus uncontrolled patients. Results: 109 patients [61 women; median age at diagnosis 34 years; 95.3% macroadenomas] from 10 Brazilian centers were studied. Previous treatment included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (34%), somatostatin receptor ligands (99%), and cabergoline (67%). Before PEGV, median levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-I % of upper limit of normal were 4.3 µg/L, 613 ng/mL, and 209%, respectively. Pre-diabetes/diabetes was present in 48.6% and tumor remnant in 71% of patients. Initial dose was 10 mg/day in all except 4 cases, maximum dose was 30 mg/day, and median exposure time was 30.5 months. PEGV was used as monotherapy in 11% of cases. Normal IGF-I levels was obtained in 74.1% of patients. Glycemic control improved in 56.6% of patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes. Exposure time, pre-treatment GH and IGF-I levels were predictors of response. Tumor enlargement occurred in 6.5% and elevation of liver enzymes in 9.2%. PEGV was discontinued in 6 patients and 3 deaths unrelated to the drug were reported. Conclusions: In a real-life scenario, PEGV is a highly effective and safe treatment for acromegaly patients not controlled with other therapies