A Guide for Clinical Research Coordinator Management and Support

Research faculty who procure extramural funding need departmental support to satisfy the demands of conducting clinical research trials. The growing complexities, regulations, and ethical requirements of clinical research can be arduous. This may discourage faculty who have minimal protected time for research due to clinical and/or training obligations. Often research faculty are unaware of the support a highly qualified Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC) can provide. Retaining highly qualified CRCs has become difficult as the role has become more extensive and often leads to burnout. This project involves the development of a guide to assist Principal Investigators in managing and supporting Clinical Research Coordinators (CRCs). The guide is an easy to follow, comprehensive resource that provides information on hiring, training, workload management, and helpful tips on professional development and performance evaluation, based on research and the author’s experience as a CRC and assistant director of research for over 25 years

Establishing Dosing Recommendations for Efavirenz in HIV/TB-Coinfected Children Younger Than 3 Years.

BackgroundCYP2B6 516 genotype-directed dosing improves efavirenz (EFV) exposures in HIV-infected children younger than 36 months, but such data are lacking in those with tuberculosis (TB) coinfection.MethodsPhase I, 24-week safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of EFV in HIV-infected children aged 3 to <36 months, with or without TB. CYP2B6 516 genotype classified children into extensive metabolizers (516 TT/GT) and poor metabolizers [(PMs), 516 TT]. EFV doses were 25%-33% higher in children with HIV/TB coinfection targeting EFV area under the curve (AUC) 35-180 μg × h/mL, with individual dose adjustment as necessary. Safety and virologic evaluations were performed every 4-8 weeks.ResultsFourteen children from 2 African countries and India with HIV/TB enrolled, with 11 aged 3 to <24 months and 3 aged 24-36 months, 12 extensive metabolizers and 2 PMs. Median (Q1, Q3) EFV AUC was 92.87 (40.95, 160.81) μg × h/mL in 8/9 evaluable children aged 3 to <24 months and 319.05 (172.56, 360.48) μg × h/mL in children aged 24-36 months. AUC targets were met in 6/8 and 2/5 of the younger and older age groups, respectively. EFV clearance was reduced in PM's and older children. Pharmacokinetic modeling predicted adequate EFV concentrations if children younger than 24 months received TB-uninfected dosing. All 9 completing 24 weeks achieved viral suppression. Five/14 discontinued treatment early: 1 neutropenia, 3 nonadherence, and 1 with excessive EFV AUC.ConclusionsGenotype-directed dosing safely achieved therapeutic EFV concentrations and virologic suppression in HIV/TB-coinfected children younger than 24 months, but further study is needed to confirm appropriate dosing in those aged 24-36 months. This approach is most important for young children and currently a critical unmet need in TB-endemic countries

Fosamprenavir with Ritonavir Pharmacokinetics during Pregnancy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir during pregnancy and postpartum. Amprenavir (the active moiety of fosamprenavir) and ritonavir intensive pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed at steady state during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and postpartum. Plasma concentrations of amprenavir and ritonavir were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. The target amprenavir area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) was higher than the 10th percentile (27.7 μg · h/ml) of the median area under the curve for ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir in adults receiving twice-daily fosamprenavir-ritonavir at 700 mg/100 mg. Twenty-nine women were included in the analysis. The amprenavir AUC from time zero to 12 h (AUC0-12) was lower (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 0.60 [confidence interval {CI}, 0.49 to 0.72] [P < 0.001]) while its apparent oral clearance was higher (GMR, 1.68 [CI, 1.38 to 2.03] [P < 0.001]) in the third trimester than postpartum. Similarly, the ritonavir AUC0-12 was lower in the second (GMR, 0.51 [CI, 0.28 to 0.91] [P = 0.09]) and third (GMR, 0.72 [CI, 0.55 to 0.95] [P = 0.005]) trimesters than postpartum, while its apparent oral clearance was higher in the second (GMR, 1.98 [CI, 1.10 to 3.56] [P = 0.06]) and third (GMR, 1.38 [CI, 1.05 to 1.82] [P = 0.009]) trimesters than postpartum. The amprenavir area under the curve exceeded the target for 6/8 (75%) women in the 2nd trimester, 18/28 (64%) in the 3rd trimester, and 19/22 (86.4%) postpartum, and the trough concentrations (Cmin) of amprenavir were 4- to 16-fold above the mean amprenavir-protein-adjusted 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.146 μg/ml. Although amprenavir plasma concentrations in women receiving ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir were lower during pregnancy than postpartum, the reduced amprenavir concentrations were still above the exposures needed for viral suppression