38 research outputs found
General mental ability and specific abilities: Their relative importance for extrinsic career success
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the American Psychological Association via the DOI in this recordRecent research on the role of general mental ability (GMA) and specific abilities in
work-related outcomes has shown that the results differ depending on the theoretical and
conceptual approach that researchers use. While earlier research has typically assumed that
GMA causes the specific abilities and has thus used incremental validity analysis, more recent
research has explored the implications of treating GMA and specific abilities as equals (differing
only in breadth and not subordination) and has used relative importance analysis. In this paper,
we extend this work to the prediction of extrinsic career success operationalized as pay, income,
and the attainment of jobs with high prestige. Results, based on a large national sample, revealed
that GMA and specific abilities measured in school were good predictors of job prestige
measured after 11 years, pay measured after 11 years, and income 51 years later toward the end
of the participants’ work lives. With one exception, GMA was a dominant predictor in
incremental validity analyses. However, in relative importance analyses, the majority of the
explained variance was explained by specific abilities, and GMA was not more important than
single specific abilities in relative importance analyses. Visuospatial, verbal, and mathematical
abilities all had substantial variance shares and were also more important than GMA in some of
the analyses. Implications for the interpretation of cognitive ability data and facilitating people’s
success in their careers are discussed
Detecting Consensus Emergence in Organizational Multilevel Data: Power Simulations
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recordTheories suggest that groups within organizations often develop shared values, beliefs, affect, behaviors or agreed-upon routines; however, researchers rarely study predictors of consensus emergence over time. Recently, a multilevel-methods approach for detecting and studying emergence in organizational field data has been described. This approach—the consensus emergence model—builds on an extended three-level multilevel model. Researchers planning future studies based on the consensus emergence model need to consider (a) sample size characteristics required to detect emergence effects with satisfactory statistical power, and (b) how the distribution of the overall sample size across the levels of the multilevel model influences power. We systematically address both issues by conducting a power simulation for detecting main and moderating effects involving consensus emergence under a variety of typical research scenarios, and provide an R-based tool that readers can use to estimate power. Our discussion focuses on the future use and development of multilevel methods for studying emergence in organizational research
Cognitive control strategies and adaptive performance in a complex work task
This is the author accepted manuscript. the final version is available from the American Psychological Association via the DOI in this recordAdapting to task changes in work settings frequently calls not only for shifting one’s
thoughts and behaviors to the new demands, but also for dealing with outdated knowledge and
skills. This article focuses on the role of control strategies in task adaptation, and reports two
experimental studies using an air traffic control simulation task. In both studies (N = 66 and 105
with k = 1,320 and 1,680 observations, respectively), all participants first learned and performed
an initial version of the task, then received instruction about control strategies, performed an
altered version of the task with new execution rules, and finally worked on a memory test.
Participants were instructed to either deliberately forget the old rules, remember the old rules, or
simply learn the new task (Study 2 only). Results from discontinuous growth curve modeling
revealed that the directed forgetting in both studies and the control group in Study 2 showed
higher performance in the simulation after the change relative to their performance before the
change (transition adaptation). There were no relearning differences between the groups
suggesting that these differences persisted throughout the task. However, the memory test at the
end of the study revealed that the directed forgetting groups and the learning control group
remembered less outdated task execution rules in the memory test after the simulation than the
remembering group. The findings suggest that different types of cognitive strategies have costs
and benefits. Conceptual and practical implications of these findings are discussed
What are agile, flexible, or adaptable employees and students? A typology of dynamic individual differences in applied settings
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recordThe applied psychology literature has discussed and used a variety of different definitions of
dynamic individual differences. Descriptions like dynamic, agile, adaptive, or flexible can refer to a
variety of different types of constructs. The present article contributes to the literature by presenting an
organizing typology of dynamic constructs. We also conducted a literature review of four major applied
journals over the last 15 years to validate the taxonomy and to use it to map what type of dynamic
individual differences constructs are typically studied in the applied psychology literature. The typology
includes six basic conceptualizations of dynamic individual differences: Variability constructs
(inconsistency across situations), skill acquisition constructs (learning new skills), transition constructs
(avoiding “loss” in performance after unforeseen change), reacquisition constructs (relearning after
change), acceleration/deceleration constructs (losing or gaining energy by displaying the behavior), and
integration/dissolution constructs (behavior becomes more or less uniform). We provide both verbal
and statistical definitions for each of these constructs, and demonstrate how these conceptualizations
can be operationalized in assessment and criterion measurement using R code and simulated data. We
also show how researchers can test different dynamic explanations using likelihood-based R² statistics
Stop thinking: an experience sampling study on suppressing distractive thoughts at work
This is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this record. In modern work environments, it can be difficult for workers to avoid becoming
distracted from their current task. This study investigates person–situation interactions
to predict thought control activities (kind of self-control), which aim to stop distracting
thoughts that enter the mind. Specifically, it was examined (1) how challenging work
demands (time pressure, task complexity) activate workers’ thought control to stop
distractive thoughts (nlevel2 = 143) and relate to the effort to do so (nlevel2 = 91) in
daily working life and (2) how these relationships differ according workers’ general
cognitive ability to suppress unwanted thoughts. To understand these person–situation
interactions, an experience sampling study was combined with a laboratory task
assessing the ability to suppress unwanted thoughts (think/no-think task). Multilevel
modeling revealed that workers’ engage more often and more intensively in thought
control activities at a moderate level of time pressure but only when they had a
higher general ability to suppress unwanted thoughts. For workers with a lower ability
to suppress unwanted thoughts, increasing time pressure was negatively related to
thought control activities, even at very low levels of time pressure. Thus, whether time
pressure activates or hinders thought control depends on individuals’ ability to suppress
distractive thoughts.German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG
Stressor reflections, sleep, and psychological well-being: A pre-registered experimental test of self-distanced versus self-immersed reflections
This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recordData availability statement: All data and analysis code are publicly available via our OSF project (https://osf.io/ue9jm/). We pre-registered the design and analysis plan for this experiment via the OSF (https://osf.io/jyf69). Deviations from our registered protocol are reported in the manuscript in the section ‘Deviations from Pre-Registered Protocol’.Evidence supports the effectiveness of cuing people to analyse negative autobiographical experiences from self-distanced rather than self-immersed perspectives. However, the evidence on which this expectation resides is limited largely to static snapshots of mean levels of cognitive and emotional factors. Via a pre-registered, randomised controlled trial (N = 257), we examined the differential effectiveness of self-distanced relative to self-immersed reflections on mean levels and within-person variability of sleep duration and quality as well as psychological well-being over a 5-day working week. Except for sleep quality, we found that reflecting from a psychologically distanced perspective, overall, was no more effective for mean levels and within-person variability of sleep duration, well-being, and stress-related factors than when the current self is fully immersed in the experiential reality of the event. We consider several substantive and methodological considerations (e.g., dosage, salience of stressor event) that require interrogation in future research via experimental and longitudinal observational methods
Prognostic model to predict postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery based on a national prospective observational cohort study.
Background: Acute illness, existing co-morbidities and surgical stress response can all contribute to postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study was prospectively to develop a pragmatic prognostic model to stratify patients according to risk of developing AKI after major gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: This prospective multicentre cohort study included consecutive adults undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection, liver resection or stoma reversal in 2-week blocks over a continuous 3-month period. The primary outcome was the rate of AKI within 7 days of surgery. Bootstrap stability was used to select clinically plausible risk factors into the model. Internal model validation was carried out by bootstrap validation. Results: A total of 4544 patients were included across 173 centres in the UK and Ireland. The overall rate of AKI was 14·2 per cent (646 of 4544) and the 30-day mortality rate was 1·8 per cent (84 of 4544). Stage 1 AKI was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (unadjusted odds ratio 7·61, 95 per cent c.i. 4·49 to 12·90; P < 0·001), with increasing odds of death with each AKI stage. Six variables were selected for inclusion in the prognostic model: age, sex, ASA grade, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate, planned open surgery and preoperative use of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker. Internal validation demonstrated good model discrimination (c-statistic 0·65). Discussion: Following major gastrointestinal surgery, AKI occurred in one in seven patients. This preoperative prognostic model identified patients at high risk of postoperative AKI. Validation in an independent data set is required to ensure generalizability
Implementation of a population-based epidemiological rare disease registry: study protocol of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) - registry Swabia
BACKGROUND: The social and medical impact of rare diseases is increasingly recognized. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most prevalent of the motor neuron diseases. It is characterized by rapidly progressive damage to the motor neurons with a survival of 2–5 years for the majority of patients. The objective of this work is to describe the study protocol and the implementation steps of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) registry Swabia, located in the South of Germany. METHODS/DESIGN: The ALS registry Swabia started in October 2010 with both, the retrospective (01.10.2008-30.09.2010) and prospective (from 01.10.2010) collection of ALS cases, in a target population of 8.6 million persons in Southern Germany. In addition, a population based case–control study was implemented based on the registry that also included the collection of various biological materials. Retrospectively, 420 patients (222 men and 198 women) were identified. Prospectively data of ALS patients were collected, of which about 70% agreed to participate in the population-based case–control study. All participants in the case–control study provided also a blood sample. The prospective part of the study is ongoing. DISCUSSION: The ALS registry Swabia has been implemented successfully. In rare diseases such as ALS, the collaboration of registries, the comparison with external samples and biorepositories will facilitate to identify risk factors and to further explore the potential underlying pathophysiological mechanisms
