On the numerical integration of isogeometric interface elements

Zero-thickness interface elements are commonly used in computational mechanics to model material interfaces or to introduce discontinuities. The latter class requires the existence of a non-compliant interface prior to the onset of fracture initiation. This is accomplished by assigning a high dummy stiffness to the interface prior to cracking. This dummy stiffness is known to introduce oscillations in the traction profile when using Gauss quadrature for the interface elements, but these oscillations are removed when resorting to a Newton-Cotes integration scheme 1. The traction oscillations are aggravated for interface elements that use B-splines or non-uniform rational B-splines as basis functions (isogeometric interface elements), and worse, do not disappear when using Newton-Cotes quadrature. An analysis is presented of this phenomenon, including eigenvalue analyses, and it appears that the use of lumped integration (at the control points) is the only way to avoid the oscillations in isogeometric interface elements. New findings have also been obtained for standard interface elements, for example that oscillations occur in the relative displacements at the interface irrespective of the value of the dummy stiffness

The cohesive band model: A cohesive surface formulation with stress triaxiality

In the cohesive surface model cohesive tractions are transmitted across a two-dimensional surface, which is embedded in a three-dimensional continuum. The relevant kinematic quantities are the local crack opening displacement and the crack sliding displacement, but there is no kinematic quantity that represents the stretching of the fracture plane. As a consequence, in-plane stresses are absent, and fracture phenomena as splitting cracks in concrete and masonry, or crazing in polymers, which are governed by stress triaxiality, cannot be represented properly. In this paper we extend the cohesive surface model to include in-plane kinematic quantities. Since the full strain tensor is now available, a three-dimensional stress state can be computed in a straightforward manner. The cohesive band model is regarded as a subgrid scale fracture model, which has a small, yet finite thickness at the subgrid scale, but can be considered as having a zero thickness in the discretisation method that is used at the macroscopic scale. The standard cohesive surface formulation is obtained when the cohesive band width goes to zero. In principle, any discretisation method that can capture a discontinuity can be used, but partition-of-unity based finite element methods and isogeometric finite element analysis seem to have an advantage since they can naturally incorporate the continuum mechanics. When using interface finite elements, traction oscillations that can occur prior to the opening of a cohesive crack, persist for the cohesive band model. Example calculations show that Poisson contraction influences the results, since there is a coupling between the crack opening and the in-plane normal strain in the cohesive band. This coupling holds promise for capturing a variety of fracture phenomena, such as delamination buckling and splitting cracks, that are difficult, if not impossible, to describe within a conventional cohesive surface model. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

Damage processes in solids and structures and their numerical computation

A concise overview is given of some recent developments, mainly by the Delft group, of numerical modelling of damage processes. Attention is paid to discrete methods, where all damage is lumped into interface elements, and to enhanced continuum theories, where higher-order terms, either in time or in space, are added to preserve well-posedness of the rate boundary value problem after the onset of softening