Complication rates and efficacy of single-injection vs. continuous interscalene nerve block: a prospective evaluation following arthroscopic primary rotator cuff repair without a concomitant open procedure

Background: To compare the complications and efficacy of pain relief of the interscalene anesthetic block using either a single-injection (SI) vs. a continuous, indwelling catheter (CIC) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing primary, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without concomitant open procedure or biceps tenodesis were prospectively enrolled by 4 fellowship-trained sports medicine and shoulder surgeons. Patients received either a SI or CIC preoperatively based on surgeon preference. Patients were contacted by phone to complete a standard questionnaire on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Patients were asked to rate the efficacy of their subjective pain relief (scale of 0-10), document issues with the catheter, describe analgesic usage, and report pharmacological and medical complications. The primary outcome was measured as complication rate. Postoperative narcotic use, patient satisfaction, and visual analog scale pain scores were measured as secondary outcomes. Results: Seventy patients were enrolled, 33 CIC patients (13 male, 20 female, mean age 61 ± 8 years) and 37 SI patients (20 male, 17 female, mean age 59 ± 10 years). There were significantly more injection/insertion site complications in the CIC group (48%) vs. the SI group (11%, P = .001). The incidence of motor weakness was higher in the CIC group on POD 1 (P = .034), but not at any subsequent time points. On POD 1, CIC patients had a clinically significantly lower pain score compared to SI (3.2 vs. 5.4; P = .020). Similar scores were observed at subsequent time points until POD 28, when CIC again had a lower pain score (0.8 vs. 2.7; P = .005). However, this did not reach clinical significance. All patients in both groups rated a satisfaction of 9 or 10 (scale 0-10) with the anesthesia provided by their nerve block. Conclusion: CIC interscalene nerve blocks had an increased risk for injection site complications and minor complications in the immediate postoperative period when using the CIC for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without any concomitant open procedures. CIC blocks demonstrated clinically significant superior pain relief on POD 1 but were equal to SI blocks at every time point thereafter. Superior pain relief of CIC at POD 28 was not clinically significant. CIC catheters do not appear to markedly decrease the use of postoperative narcotics. Despite this trend in complication rates and pain scores, all patients in both groups were satisfied with their nerve block

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the simpliciti canal-sparing shoulder arthroplasty system: a prospective two-year multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Stemmed humeral components have been used since the 1950s; canal-sparing (also known as stemless) humeral components became commercially available in Europe in 2004. The Simpliciti total shoulder system (Wright Medical, formerly Tornier) is a press-fit, porous-coated, canal-sparing humeral implant that relies on metaphyseal fixation only. This prospective, single-arm, multicenter study was performed to evaluate the two-year clinical and radiographic results of the Simpliciti prosthesis in the U.S. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients with glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled at fourteen U.S. sites between July 2011 and November 2012 in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)-approved protocol. Their range of motion, strength, pain level, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score were compared between the preoperative and two-year postoperative evaluations. Statistical analyses were performed with the Student t test with 95% confidence intervals. Radiographic evaluation was performed at two weeks and one and two years postoperatively. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine of the 157 patients were followed for a minimum of two years. The mean age and sex-adjusted Constant, SST, and ASES scores improved from 56% preoperatively to 104% at two years (p \u3c 0.0001), from 4 points preoperatively to 11 points at two years (p \u3c 0.0001), and from 38 points preoperatively to 92 points at two years (p \u3c 0.0001), respectively. The mean forward elevation improved from 103° ± 27° to 147° ± 24° (p \u3c 0.0001) and the mean external rotation, from 31° ± 20° to 56° ± 15° (p \u3c 0.0001). The mean strength in elevation, as recorded with a dynamometer, improved from 12.5 to 15.7 lb (5.7 to 7.1 kg) (p \u3c 0.0001), and the mean pain level, as measured with a visual analog scale, decreased from 5.9 to 0.5 (p \u3c 0.0001). There were three postoperative complications that resulted in revision surgery: infection, glenoid component loosening, and failure of a subscapularis repair. There was no evidence of migration, subsidence, osteolysis, or loosening of the humeral components or surviving glenoid components. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated good results at a minimum of two years following use of the Simpliciti canal-sparing humeral component. Clinical results including the range of motion and the Constant, SST, and ASES scores improved significantly, and radiographic analysis showed no signs of loosening, osteolysis, or subsidence of the humeral components or surviving glenoid components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Teil-Aktualisierung S3-Leitlinie Schlafbezogene Atmungsstörungen bei Erwachsenen

Die Insomnie, d. h. eine Ein- und/oder Durchschlafstörung, die sich negativ auf die Leistungsfähigkeit und Tagesbefindlichkeit auswirkt, ist eine der häufigsten Erkrankungen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung. Sie wird derzeit meistens pharmakologisch und/oder psychotherapeutisch behandelt, wobei die pharmakologische Behandlung mit Benzodiazepin-Rezeptor-Agonisten zu Abhängigkeit führen kann und die Verfügbarkeit von für die Insomnie-Therapie ausgebildeten Psychotherapeuten momentan nicht in ausreichendem Maße gegeben ist. Durch innovative Behandlungsmethoden könnte hier eine Versorgungslücke effektiv geschlossen werden. Hierzu zählt die auditorische Stimulation, welche vorhandene Sinneskanäle nutzt, um den Schlaf zu beeinflussen. Bisher wurde die auditorische Stimulation vor allem zur Untersuchung von Prozessen der Gedächtniskonsolidierung bei gesunden Probanden angewendet, wobei erfolgreich eine Erhöhung langsamer Oszillationen erreicht wurde, welche vor allem während des Tiefschlafs auftreten. Erste Befunde und sekundäre Outcome-Parameter liefern Hinweise, dass die Potenzierung langsamer Oszillationen durch auditorische Stimulation den Schlaf vertiefen kann, jedoch wurde hierzu bislang keine Studie mit Insomniepatienten durchgeführt. Weitere Forschung bezüglich des Einflusses der Potenzierung langsamer Oszillationen auf die Linderung von Ein- und Durchschlafproblemen bei vorliegender nichtorganischer Insomnie erscheint daher geboten zu sein, um der hohen Beschwerdelast dieser Patientengruppe entgegenzuwirken