Monitoring the antimicrobial susceptibility of Gramnegative organisms involved in intraabdominal and urinary tract infections recovered during the SMART study (Spain, 2016 and 2017)

OBJECTIVE: Continuous antimicrobial resistance surveillance is recommended by Public Health authorities. We up-dated data from the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) surveillance study in Spain. METHODS: The antimicrobial susceptibility data and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in isolates recovered from intra-abdominal (IAI) (n=1,429) and urinary tract (UTI) (n=937) infections during the 2016- 2017 SMART study in 10 Spanish hospitals were analysed. RESULTS: Escherichia coli was the most frequently microorganism isolated (48.3% and 53.7%) followed by Klebsiella spp. (11.5% and 21.9%) in IAIs and UTIs, respectively. Figures for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 9.0% and 6.1%, being more frequently recovered from patients with nosocomial infections. Overall, 9.9% (IAI) and 14.0% (UTI) of E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis isolates were ESBL-producers, being Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.5%) from UTI of nosocomial origin the most frequent. ESBL-producers were higher in patients >60 years in both IAIs and UTIs. As in previous years, amikacin (96.3%-100% susceptibility), ertapenem (84.2%-100%) and imipenem (70.3%- 100%) were the most active antimicrobials tested among Enterobacterales species. The activity of amoxicillin-clavulanic, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin susceptibility was lower, particularly among ESBL-producers. Ertapenem susceptibility (88.9%-100%) was retained in ESBL-E. coli isolates that were resistant to these antimicrobials but decreased (28.6%-100%) in similar isolates of K. pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous antimicrobial resistance surveillance from the SMART study reveals overall maintenance of ESBL-producers in Spain, although with higher presence in isolates from UTIs than from IAIs. Moreover, ertapenem activity was high in E. coli irrespective of ESBL production but decreased in K. pneumoniae, particularly among ESBL-producers

Seguimiento de la sensibilidad antimicrobiana de microorganismos gramnegativos procedentes de infecciones intraabdominales y urinarias del estudio smart (España, 2016 y 2017)

Introducción. Las autoridades de Salud Pública recomiendan la vigilancia continua de la resistencia a los antimicrobianos. Se actualizan los datos del estudio SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) en España. Material y métodos. Se analizaron los datos de sensibilidad antimicrobiana y la producción de betalactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE) en aislamientos obtenidos en el estudio SMART de infecciones intraabdominales (IIA) (n=1.429) y del tracto urinario (ITU) (n=937) durante 2016-2017 en 10 hospitales españoles. Resultados. Escherichia coli fue el microorganismo más frecuente (54,5% y 57,5%, respectivamente), seguido de Klebsiella spp. (18,4% y 25,4%) en IIA y en ITU. En Pseudomonas aeruginosa estas cifras fueron 9% y 6%, siendo más frecuente en la infección nosocomial. El 9,9% (IIA) y el 14% (ITU) del total de los aislados de E. coli, Klebsiella spp. y Proteus mirabilis producían BLEE, obteniéndose la tasa más alta en Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.5%) en ITU nosocomial. El mayor porcentaje de aislados con BLEE se observó en pacientes >60 años, tanto en IIA como en ITU. Como en años anteriores, amikacina (sensibilidad 96,3%-100%), ertapenem (84,2%-100%) e imipenem (70,3%-100%) fueron los antimicrobianos más activos en Enterobacterales. La sensibilidad a amoxicilina-ácido clavulánico, piperacilina-tazobactam y ciprofloxacino fue menor, en particular en los productores de BLEE. La sensibilidad a ertapenem (88,9%-100%) se mantuvo en E. coli con BLEE resistente a estos antimicrobianos, pero disminuyó (28,6%-100%) en aislados similares de K. pneumoniae. Conclusiones. La vigilancia continua de la resistencia a los antimicrobianos en el estudio SMART revela el mantenimiento de la frecuencia de aislados productores de BLEE en España, pero con mayor presencia en las ITUs que en las IIAs. Además, la sensibilidad a ertapenem fue alta en E. coli con independencia de la producción de BLEE, pero disminuyó en K. pneumoniae, sobre todo en los productores de BLEE. Introduction. Continuous antimicrobial resistance surveillance is recommended by Public Health authorities. We updated data from the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) surveillance study in Spain. Material and methods. The antimicrobial susceptibility data and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in isolates recovered from intra-abdominal (IAI) (n=1,429) and urinary tract (UTI) (n=937) infections during the 2016-2017 SMART study in 10 Spanish hospitals were analysed. Results. Escherichia coli was the most frequently microorganism isolated (48.3% and 53.7%) followed by Klebsiella spp. (11.5% and 21.9%) in IAIs and UTIs, respectively. Figures for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 9.0% and 6.1%, being more frequently recovered from patients with nosocomial infections. Overall, 9.9% (IAI) and 14.0% (UTI) of E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis isolates were ESBL-producers, being Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.5%) from UTI of nosocomial origin the most frequent. ESBL-producers were higher in patients >60 years in both IAIs and UTIs. As in previous years, amikacin (96.3%-100% susceptibility), ertapenem (84.2%-100%) and imipenem (70.3%-100%) were the most active antimicrobials tested among Enterobacterales species. The activity of amoxicillin-clavulanic, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin susceptibility was lower, particularly among ESBL-producers. Ertapenem susceptibility (88.9%-100%) was retained in ESBL-E. coli isolates that were resistant to these antimicrobials but decreased (28.6%-100%) in similar isolates of K. pneumoniae. Conclusions. Continuous antimicrobial resistance surveillance from the SMART study reveals overall maintenance of ESBL-producers in Spain, although with higher presence in isolates from UTIs than from IAIs. Moreover, ertapenem activity was high in E. coli irrespective of ESBL production but decreased in K. pneumoniae, particularly among ESBL-producers

Risk Factors and Outcomes for Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Immunocompromised Patients

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) infection often occurs in immunocompromised patients, which also face an increased risk of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. A deeper knowledge of the risk factors for MDR-PSA infection in this patient population may help to choose appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy. Methods: a single-center case-control (1:2) retrospective study that included 48 patients with underlying immunosuppression developing MDR-PSA infection (cases) and 96 patients also immunocompromised that were infected with non-MDR-PSA (controls) was conducted. Both groups were matched by site of infection, clinical features and type of immunosuppression. Risk factors for MDR-PSA were assessed by logistic regression. Clinical outcomes were also compared between both groups. Results: immunosuppression was due to solid cancer in 63 (43.8%) patients, solid organ transplantation in 39 (27.1%), hematological disease in 35 (24.3%) and other causes in 7 (4.9%). Independent risk factors for MDR-PSA infection were diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR]: 4.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63–13.79; p = 0.004), antibiotic therapy in the previous 3 months (OR: 5.32; 95% CI: 1.93–14.73; p = 0.001), previous MDR-PSA colonization (OR: 42.1; 95% CI: 4.49–394.8; p = 0.001) and septic shock (OR: 3.73; 95% CI: 1.36–10.21; p = 0.010). MDR-PSA cases were less likely to receive adequate empirical therapy (14 [29.2%] vs. 69 [71.9%]; p < 0.001). 30-day clinical improvement was less common in MDR-PSA cases (25 [52.1%] vs. 76 [79.2%]; p = 0.001). Conclusions: diabetes mellitus, previous MDR-PSA colonization, prior receipt of antibiotics and septic shock acted as risk factors for developing MDR-PSA infections in immunocompromised patients, who have a poorer outcome than those infected with non-MDR-PSA strains

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates recovered from intensive care unit patients in Spain: The SUPERIOR multicentre study

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) present a high risk of developing an infection caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Consequently, new antimicrobials and combinations are required. In this study, the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) was evaluated against Enterobacterales (n = 400) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 80) clinical isolates collected from patients in Spanish ICUs with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). Overall susceptibility to C/T in P. aeruginosa isolates by infection type was 95.7% in cUTI (MIC50/90, 1/4 mg/L) and 85.3% in cIAI (MIC50/90, 1/64 mg/L). Activity against P. aeruginosa was maintained regardless of its resistance pattern, confirming that C/T is one of the best antipseudomonal agents along with colistin and amikacin. Susceptibility to C/T in Enterobacterales by infection type was 79.5/81.9% and 89.3/92.3% (EUCAST/CLSI) in cIAI and cUTI isolates, respectively. Activity was excellent against wild-type organisms, with 100% susceptible and inhibited at MIC ≤1 mg/L. Nevertheless, C/T susceptibility decreased against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates: Escherichia coli (80.4/84.8% susceptible by EUCAST/CLSI) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (59.1/77.3% susceptible by EUCAST/CLSI). No activity of C/T was observed in carbapenemase-producing isolates. The in vitro activity of C/T observed in this surveillance study suggests that this agent can be considered as a therapeutic option for cUTI and cIAI due to Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa in ICU patients, particularly when carbapenemase-producing isolates are not involved.This study was funded by MSD Spain and was supported by Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013–2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases [RD16/0016/0001, RD16/0016/0004, RD16/0016/0006, RD16/0016/0007, RD16/0016/0010 and REIPI RD16/0016/0011], co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund ‘A way to achieve Europe’ (ERDF), Operative program Intelligent Growth 2014–2020. SG-F is supported by a research contract from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain [Rio Hortega program, ref. CM17/00033]