46 research outputs found

    Interventions developed with the intervention mapping protocol in work disability prevention: a systematic review of the literature

    Get PDF
    Purposes Intervention mapping (IM) is a protocol for developing effective behavior change interventions. It has been used for 10 years to develop work disability prevention (WDP) interventions, but it is not known to what extent and with what success. The main objective of this study was to review the effectiveness of these interventions. Secondary objectives were to review their fidelity to the IM protocol, their theoretical frameworks and their content. Methods A search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Pascal, Francis, and BDSP. All titles and abstracts were reviewed. A standardized extraction form was developed. All included studies were reviewed by two reviewers blinded to each other. Results Eight WDP interventions were identified aimed at return to work (RTW; n = 6) and self-management at work (n = 2). RTW interventions targeted workers with stress-related mental disorders (n = 1), low back pain (n = 1), musculoskeletal disorders (n = 1), cancer (n = 2) and gynecological surgery (n = 1). The fidelity to the IM protocol was weaker for the participatory planning group. Matrices of change, change methods, and applications were systematically reported. The main theoretical frameworks used were the attitude-social influence-self efficacy model (n = 4) and the theory of planned behavior (n = 2). Half of the interventions included a workplace component (n = 4). Two interventions were reported as effective, and one partially effective. Conclusion The IM protocol is used in WDP since 2007. The participative dimension appears underused. Few theoretical frameworks were used. Implications are to better consider the stakeholders involvement, and mobilize theoretical frameworks with greater attempts to intervene on the work environment

    A survey from the French Urology Association about sick leave prescriptions by 145 surgeons

    No full text
    National audienceObjectives. - To describe and evaluate prescriptions of sick leave by urology surgeons for different kinds of interventions. Methods. - Between January and April 2006, a web-based survey was completed by urology surgeons on a voluntary basis. The analyzed data pertained to personal characteristics of the surgeons, mean duration of sick leave for 15 interventions and the type of job of the patient (strenuous or not). Analyses were performed with software SAS (TM) version 9.2. Descriptive analyses were performed and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to search for statistically significant differences between variables (p < 0,05). Results. - One hundred and forty-eight surgeons were involved and 145 answers could be analyzed. Mean age of the surgeons was 46,3 +/- 9,4 years. Urology surgeons were in the public sector (n = 73/140; 52%), in private practice (n = 43/140; 31%) or both (n=24/140; 17%). Kruskal-Wallis test showed that all patients who had a job considered as strenuous had significantly longer sick leave prescriptions. Younger surgeons (under 40) used to prescribe shorter sick leaves than their older counterparts. Conclusion. - Sick leave prescriptions of the urology surgeons were globally homogeneous in this survey. Only a few interventions were the occasion of discordant prescriptions depending upon the age or practice (public/private) of the surgeons. Several hypotheses could be further explored as regard the source of variation in sick leave prescriptions. These results are usable for those stakeholders who are interested in continuous medical education and evaluation. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS
    corecore