Concurrent use of prescription drugs and herbal medicinal products in older adults: A systematic review

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The use of herbal medicinal products (HMPs) is common among older adults. However, little is known about concurrent use with prescription drugs as well as the potential interactions associated with such combinations. Objective Identify and evaluate the literature on concurrent prescription and HMPs use among older adults to assess prevalence, patterns, potential interactions and factors associated with this use. Methods Systematic searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Science and Cochrane from inception to May 2017 for studies reporting concurrent use of prescription medicines with HMPs in adults (≥65 years). Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. The Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre) three stage approach to mixed method research was used to synthesise data. Results Twenty-two studies were included. A definition of HMPs or what was considered HMP was frequently missing. Prevalence of concurrent use by older adults varied widely between 5.3% and 88.3%. Prescription medicines most combined with HMPs were antihypertensive drugs, beta blockers, diuretics, antihyperlipidemic agents, anticoagulants, analgesics, antihistamines, antidiabetics, antidepressants and statins. The HMPs most frequently used were: ginkgo, garlic, ginseng, St John’s wort, Echinacea, saw palmetto, evening primrose oil and ginger. Potential risks of bleeding due to use of ginkgo, garlic or ginseng with aspirin or warfarin was the most reported herb-drug interaction. Some data suggests being female, a lower household income and less than high school education were associated with concurrent use. Conclusion Prevalence of concurrent prescription drugs and HMPs use among older adults is substantial and potential interactions have been reported. Knowledge of the extent and manner in which older adults combine prescription drugs will aid healthcare professionals can appropriately identify and manage patients at risk.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio

Concurrent Use of Drugs and Supplements in a Community-Dwelling Population Aged 50 Years or More: Potential Benefits and Risks

Background: The use of vitamin and mineral (VMs) and non-vitamin/non-mineral supplements (non-VMs) in the general population and the older population in developed countries has increased. When combined with drugs, their use can be associated with benefit and potential risks. Objective: The aims of this study were to determine the extent and associated factors of the combined use of drugs and VM/non-VM supplements, and to examine the potential major drug–supplement interactions Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of first-wave data of TILDA, The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, nationally representative a cohort including 8,081 community-dwelling persons aged ≥50 years. Prevalences including 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were weighted to the population. Group differences in drug and supplement use were assessed using Pearson’s Chi-square test, and associations between concurrent drug–supplement use and covariates were assessed using logistic regression. Potential interactions between drugs and supplements were assessed using relevant sources. Results: Every seventh respondent (14.0 %; 95 % CI 13.1–15.0) reported regular concurrent use of drugs and supplements; 7.9 % (95 % CI 7.3–8.6) took only VMs, 3.9 % (95 % CI 3.4–4.4) took only non-VMs, and 2.2 % (95 % CI 1.8–2.6) took at least one of each concurrently with drugs. Concurrent use was more prevalent in women and in the oldest (≥75 years) group. Chronic disease, female sex, third-level education and private medical insurance were associated with an increased likelihood of use of both supplement types, whereas those classed as employed were much less likely to use any supplements. Supplements were combined with drugs in all of the commonly prescribed therapeutic groups, ranging from just under 60 % with drugs for bone diseases to 15.7 % with drugs for diabetes. Potential major drug–supplement interactions were detected in 4.5 % (95 % CI 3.4–5.8) of concurrent drug–supplement users, and were more prevalent in older respondents. Conclusions: Concurrent use of drugs and supplements among those aged over 50 years in the Irish population is substantial and increases with age. There is considerable variation in usage, and the outcome of this approach is evidence of unmet need and therefore unrealised benefits among some subgroups, and of exposure to avoidable and potential serious drug interactions among others

The cost of frailty in France

International audienceThe objective of the present work is to explore the incremental costs of frailty associated with ambulatory health care expenditures (HCE) among the French population of community-dwellers aged 65 or more in 2012. We make use of a unique dataset that combines nationally representative health survey with respondents’ National Health Insurance data on ambulatory care expenditures. Several econometric specifications of generalized linear models are tested and an exponential model with gamma errors is eventually retained. Because frailty is a distinct health condition, its contribution to HCE was assessed in comparison with other health covariates (including chronic diseases and functional limitations, time-to-death, and a multidimensional composite health index). Results indicate that whatever health covariates are considered, frailty provides significant additional explanative power to the models. Frailty is an important omitted variable in HCE models. It depicts a progressive condition, which has an incremental effect on ambulatory health expenditures of roughly €750 additional euros for pre-frail individuals and €1500 for frail individuals

Polypharmacy among older adults with dementia compared with those without dementia in the United States

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In older persons with dementia (PWD), extensive medication use is often unnecessary, discordant with goals of care, and possibly harmful. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and medication constituents of polypharmacy among older PWD attending outpatient visits in the US. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: PWD and persons without dementia (PWOD) age ≥65 years attending outpatient visits recorded in the nationally representative National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), 2014-2016. MEASUREMENTS: PWD were identified as those with a diagnosis of dementia on the NAMCS encounter form and/or those receiving an anti-dementia medication. Visits with PWD and PWOD were compared in terms of sociodemographic, practice/physician factors, comorbidities, and prescribing outcomes. Regression analyses examined the effect of dementia diagnosis on contributions by clinically relevant medication categories to polypharmacy (defined as being prescribed ≥5 prescription and/or non-prescription medications). RESULTS: The unweighted sample involved 918 visits for PWD and 26,543 visits for PWOD, representing 29.0 and 780 million outpatient visits. PWD had a median age of 81 and on average had 2.8 comorbidities other than dementia; 63% were female. The median number of medications in PWD was 8 compared to 3 in PWOD (p<0.001). After adjustment, PWD had significantly higher odds of being prescribed ≥5 medications (AOR 3.0; 95% CI: 2.1-4.3) or ≥10 medications (AOR 2.8; 95% CI: 2.0-4.2) compared to PWOD. The largest sources of medications among PWD were cardiovascular and central nervous system medications; usage from other categories was generally elevated in PWD compared to PWOD. PWD had higher odds of receiving at least one highly sedating or anticholinergic medication (AOR 2.5; 95% CI: 1.6-3.9). CONCLUSION: In a representative sample of outpatient visits, polypharmacy was extremely common among PWD, driven by a wide array of medication categories. Addressing polypharmacy in PWD will require cross-cutting and multidisciplinary approaches